OpenTheo

#187 NT Wright livestream Q&A (Replay)

Ask NT Wright Anything — Premier
00:00
00:00

#187 NT Wright livestream Q&A (Replay)

September 28, 2023
Ask NT Wright Anything
Ask NT Wright AnythingPremier

From 2020: Tom Wright talks about his new book ‘God and the Pandemic’ and takes a variety of live listener questions in this livestream edition of the show. Justin and Lucy Brierley ask Tom questions on racism, other religions, the problem of suffering, heaven and the Gospels, all submitted during the show via Facebook live. • Subscribe to the Ask NT Wright Anything podcast: https://pod.link/1441656192 • More shows, free eBook, newsletter, and sign up to ask Tom your questions: https://premierunbelievable.com • For live events: http://www.unbelievable.live • For online learning: https://www.premierunbelievable.com/training • Support us in the USA: http://www.premierinsight.org/unbelievableshow • Support us in the rest of the world: https://www.premierunbelievable.com/donate

Share

Transcript

Thank you for joining us on this NT Wright podcast today. Before we launch into the programme, I want to be sure you don't miss out on an inspiring free resource from the archives of the Unbelievable podcast, titled In Conversation with Tim Keller. As one of the leading apologists of our day, Tim was powerfully gifted to communicate the truth of the Gospel with relevance, windscreenness, and clarity.
While we're deeply saddened by his passing, we thank God that Tim's ongoing legacy of teaching and inspiration, which was a great honor to be able to be here.
This will continue to equip and empower the worldwide church in the years to come. In this free PDF download, your catch-up glimpse of Tim Keller's pastoral heart, an incredible mind as he talks about issues of theology, faith, and suffering.
Download your copy today by visiting premierinsight.org slash NT Wright. That's premierinsight.org slash NT Wright.
Welcome to this replay of Ask NT Wright Anything, where we go back into the archives to bring you the best of the thought and theology of Tom Wright, answering questions submitted by you, the listener.
You can find more episodes, as well as many more resources for exploring faith at premierunbelievable.com, and registering there will unlock access through the newsletter to updates, free bonus videos, and ebooks. That's premierunbelievable.com. And now, for today's replay,
of Ask NT Wright Anything. The Ask NT Wright Anything podcast.
Well, hello there, and welcome to a very special edition of the Ask NT Wright Anything show, and Tom's just sending himself live as well here. And we're really glad that you've joined us here on Facebook. Very first time we've tried something like this from the show.
I'm all a bit of a jitter because I'm one who will the technology work as far as I know it all is. So welcome along to this very special live event. I'm Justin Briley, theology and apologetics editor for premier and host of the fortnightly podcast in which Tom Wright answers your questions.
And my co-host for today helped me to put your questions to Tom is my wife, the Reverend Lucy Briley, who's the minister of Woking United Reform Church here in Surrey, where we live. Now, we are broadcasting from our house and Tom joins us from lockdown at his home in Oxford. And Tom is, of course, the former Bishop of Durham.
He's held numerous academic positions, most recently taking up the position of senior research fellow at Wycliffe Hall, Oxford. And he's written many, many books. The most recent of which is God and the pandemic.
His response to what this present global crisis means for the world and the church. So Tom, welcome along to the programme. Thank you very much.
It's very good to be with you. And yeah, I'm just getting a little bit used to broadcasting as it were from my own study.
It felt very strange to begin with, but I've done it a few times in the last few weeks.
That's just one of the old things we've had to learn in lockdown, I guess.
Absolutely. I'm going to ask you a bit more about your lockdown experience in a moment.
But before we do that, I just want to make sure that if you enjoy what you're going to be watching and hearing tonight,
that you'll make sure that you're subscribed to our fortnightly podcast. I get to sit down with Tom on a regular basis and ask him all kinds of interesting questions. And you don't need to miss an episode if you subscribe to the podcast over at AskNTRight.com. It's brought to you in partnership with SBCK, Tom's UK publisher, and also NT Right Online, who produced Tom's online video courses too.
And I'm going to let you in on a little special offer they're doing a little later on in the programme too. As well as staying up here on Facebook, tonight's live, and will of course be available very soon on the podcast as well. And while you're at that podcast page, why not subscribe to the newsletter as well? That keeps you in touch with the show.
All of our extra content. Again, it's AskNTRight.com. And there's a link in the description of this Facebook post where you can click through and find out more. So we're broadcasting across a number of Facebook channels tonight, but whichever one you're watching through will be taking as many questions as we can.
It's very simple to submit a question. All you do is ask it in the comments underneath this live video. And we've got someone collating those and sending it through to Lucy and myself.
In fact, thumbs up and a shout out for Peter Barham who's doing a magnificent job already collating those. And we'll try to ask as many as we can of Tom who's very bravely going to be taking these without any notice whatsoever of what may be coming his way. And if you like someone else's question as well, obviously do feel free to give that a like to and bring it to our attention.
So we're going to be talking through some of the issues and Lucy's going to be helping with bringing up some of the questions and putting her own thoughts into this as well. So yes, we last spoke, I think near the beginning of lockdown, Tom, didn't we? And obviously that was a bit of a novelty for all of us. 10 or 11 weeks in, the novelty is definitely worn off.
So how are you and Maggie holding up at the moment?
Well, it comes and goes. And it was a great relief just a few days ago when the government seemed to be relaxing some of the restrictions to the point where we felt justified in welcoming our youngest son and his family with two little people. Into our back garden, we kept our distance, they sat over there, we sat over here and we were able to have coffee and that sort of thing.
And then we did the same at their house and again, we stayed in the garden and we kept our distance, but it was a huge sigh of relief. And one of the things we've learned is that FaceTime is great fun, but it's not the same thing as actually being with people. And of course, all the technology is wonderful and has helped in many, many ways.
And we still haven't been able to go and see the other bits of our family, one up North in Durham, one in Bristol, one in Litchfield. But we obviously talked to them on FaceTime or the phone all the time, but that's a real deprivation. And there's just no way around that.
And I know we're doing reasonably all right, we can get grocery deliveries, I nip out and grab a newspaper,
keeping my social distance, et cetera, et cetera. And I can top up with one of the things like bread and milk if our regular deliveries haven't got enough. Maggie isn't really allowed out except for a daily walk, which we do.
And the college opposite where we live has kindly allowed us to use their big garden to walk around in. If you walk around our back garden, it takes about one minute. But you college, which is opposite us, takes us about 20 minutes to walk around their garden, stopping to look at the wonderful shrubs.
So that's been a real blessing to us. So we are a lot better off than somebody say who lives in high-rise and hasn't really got anywhere to go. So I'm not grumbling, but it has been very odd and actually quite tiring.
Just doing the exact same things day by day. There's a sort of weariness about that. There's a kind of mental fog and fatigue that sort of sets in.
It is. I mean, today, I spent most of today thinking it was Thursday. And then I thought, wait a minute, I haven't done Justin's show yet.
And that's all Wednesday. So it must still be Wednesday. I know it would be.
We have the very same experience here.
You've had been pretty productive though. Nonetheless, you've obviously been working on a number of books.
Your big commentary on Galatians, I think, is in the pipeline. The Galatians' commentary was finished. I think the week after Easter was it all possibly 10 days after Easter.
That was a great relief. And actually having the pandemic as the reason why we had to stay here was the pandemic. And it was very good from that point of view because I had hoped to have it finished about a month before that.
And then I was supposed to be into America to do some lectures. Well, the lectures were canceled. So I just had an extra week.
And of course, you know, work expands to fill the time available and all that.
But it was a blessed relief. And then this little book on the pandemic just happened partly because you were asking me questions.
And other people were asking me questions. And I was forced to think through some things that I hadn't really wrestled with before. And so it turned into a little book.
Well, this is the book I just wanted to ask you briefly about at the beginning here. And people may have further questions too, as we see them come in. But it's called God and the Pandemic published by SBCK in Zondevan.
So in general, in terms, without, you know, obviously being able to cover everything that's in that booklet, where do you see God in the midst of all of this craziness? Well, I think the answer to where do we see God always, if you're a Christian, has to come and be filtered through the question of Jesus himself. And one of the things that I'm trying to do in the book is to try to enable anyone who reads it and to grow up in terms of how we read the whole Bible as a narrative. Because, you see, people were coming back at me and saying, well, the prophet Amos says that God punishes people for their iniquity by sending plagues or whatever.
So surely that's what's going on now. Wait a minute, wait a minute. There are other strands in the Old Testament as well.
And you only understand how they all work together when you put Jesus in the middle of the picture and work back to the Old Testament from him and then forwards into the Christian life from him. And John's Jesus says, he who has seen me has seen the Father. So when we ask, where is God in this? I don't want to answer that question without it being Jesus shaped.
There's been far too much of that in modern Western Christianity, actually trying to talk about God in general, as though God is the celestial CEO and Jesus is the one who comes in on the side to rescue us from our sins. No, Jesus is the one in whom we see God. And in Jesus in the gospels, we see the God who weeps at the tomb of his friend.
And that to me is pretty darn central in all of this right now, that we're not thinking of God as the CEO sitting upstairs, pressing buttons and pulling levers, and then Jesus doing a bit on the side. We are trying to understand what it might mean, that the God who the Bible speaks of comes to share and bear the pain in himself. So to put it crudely, where is God in the middle of this? God is on the front line in doing the dangerous stuff out there helping the helpers, the carers, the nurses, the doctors, and administering the last rights to people who need it and praying with the dying and so on.
And I'm happy to say that there are many, many, many Christians, both in the medical profession and among hospital chaplains and so on, who are doing precisely that. And that's the answer to where is God in the midst of all this. It's not why isn't God doing something magic about it.
It's God as usual getting his hands dirty in order to be with his people. Yeah, I can see already that a number of questions are coming in, obviously on the back, but particularly actually on the back of this most recent obvious stuff that's been turning everyone up. The death of George Floyd in the USA and all of the issues that that has provoked and obviously a lot of protests, both peaceful and violent protests.
So we might get to some of that shortly. But firstly, just on a very practical level, sticking with the coronavirus and lockdown, I know that you had a letter published, I think just today, in the times, with your thoughts on whether the government's doing enough for the moment to see that churches do at some point, or at least there's a plan in place for churches to be re-oused to the public. Yes, it's an interesting one because I cycle around Oxford, I mean my wife does a cycle but I can, and so that's how I've been getting more exercise, which has been great actually.
It's been a wonderful May, lovely weather, Oxford is empty, no tourists, no students, just being hit with a cycle anywhere. But I've noticed that all sorts of little places like off-licenses have been open and some quite small food stores have been open, and even though they say try to practice social distancing, actually it's more or less impossible, in squeezy with the tiles and so on. So when Boris Johnson then says, okay, you can have garden centers open and council rubbish tips open and that sort of thing, because they're important for the community.
I want to say, excuse me, churches are also important for the community. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying we should just randomly open them. You should only open a building that you can actually keep properly clean and that's difficult, and also when you can maintain the appropriate social distancing.
So I'm not being casual or flippant about this, but I think the thing that was worried me is that many Western Christians, and many Western non-Christians seem to assume that Christianity is just a private place. And it's a private hobby for those who like to do that sort of thing by themselves. So it's quite okay to have a streamed church service and you sit up embed in your pajamas and supposedly take part in it.
And I want to say, as I said in the letter, FaceTime is okay, but genuine family life is different. Christianity is a team sport and not a Microsoft Teams sport. Microsoft Teams is better than nothing.
We use it in Wycliffe Hall morning prayer.
There we all are on the screen, as you and I are now, but it's not the same as actually being in the same space and sharing people's lives and being able to pray with them in that way that you can when you're face to face. So as soon as it's possible, I want to say for the public health of Christianity, which is an outward facing faith, which exists for the benefit of its non-members, as William Temple said, therefore we must get the churches open as soon as it is appropriate and safe to do so and not assume that they're just a little leisure activity which can wait at the bottom of the list somewhere.
That was the point I was making. I mean, this is obviously a very practical issue for us. Lucy is the Minister of Worship here.
And it's kind of all those dilemmas, aren't there about when is right?
What would it be like anyway once we do return with all of the... Yeah, I think that's the big question that we're all asking, especially those of us in leadership in the church because we're hearing different views from members of our church families, some of whom are desperate to get back and be able to worship together. And others who are frightened because we know that this virus is still out there, it's still active, hasn't gone away. So what could gathering together for worship look like? And will it be anything that we recognise? And there's been a lot of conversation certainly here in our church family about singing and how important singing is to the act of worship and what might be possible.
I know that in the German churches they've been allowed to meet but not sing. And the thought of German church is not singing. It's just a contradiction in terms.
It's a strange time and when we just have to navigate as we find our way through, but obviously what your plea was for the government to just take it seriously and not see it as a sign. I got a memo from somebody yesterday which said that the Bishop of London, who is of course herself a very... has been a very senior nurse and got an award for that. She's Dame Ceramilale.
She has got people drawn up plans into the detail of what sort of a pen you should have to sign the registers for a marriage.
And once we get down to that kind of detail, it shows we are taking this very seriously. We're not just saying, okay, let's just go ahead and do whatever.
And we must go on taking it seriously like that.
Well, I think it's about time to turn to some of the questions that are coming in. Thank you for all of those who are already sending in questions.
It's great to see them coming piling in already.
I can see that we've got a lot of people watching already, over a thousand people watching at present. And I'm sure more people would join across the course of the show.
So just before we take some of those questions, which you can leave, by the way, in the comments section, wherever you're watching this Facebook Live video, I do just want to give a quick shout out to NTWrite online. Brilliant website where you can find Tom's video courses. They actually have a free e-book that you can get hold of.
If you just go to the website, go to NTWrite online.org forward slash ask NTWrite.
And it's all on the story of Acts 15. And it's absolutely free if you sign up there to become part of that.
Yeah, and we in Waking United Reform Church are studying the Book of Acts. We felt particularly cool to study that just recently. So we've picked it up from the Ascension Pentecost.
And now we're following on through the Book of Acts. So Woking Your Seafate, you should all be downloading that book. And it's no secret that a certain commentary called Acts for Everyone is featuring frequently in the preparation.
It's always lying around in our house. You know, writing that whole series, the Acts one was one of my favorites, because I'd never written an exposition of Acts or taught a whole course all the way through Acts before. And I'd forgotten what a page turn of the Book of Acts is.
It is.
Every page, something else. And the way it builds up and accumulates, it's an extraordinary book.
Well, just next door, Tom, we've got a whole puppet stage set up which we use on our livestream services. And I sell for the children, get behind there every Sunday and tell them what are the stories from Acts. Wonderful.
We're bringing it to life hopefully. Anyway, yes, we are going to go to some of your questions now that have been coming in. Thank you very much.
Do keep them coming in the comments and we'll get to as many of them as we can over the course of the next hour.
Now, obviously, the big question that has been coming in and before we go to some of the other issues that obviously people want to talk about has been all of the events recently in the USA. And we've got a couple of questions here.
One of them is from Anthony who says, hello from Columbus, Ohio.
I imagine that this is on the mind of many here and have seen some questions related to it, but I'm wondering, Tom, what your view is on the appropriate response to social and racial tensions in the United States. In particular, I think of Amos.
I find myself stuck and unsure of what steps I should take.
Could you provide some guidance on this topic in particular and political activism in general? And there are lots of other similar questions. I'll just give you one more of a similar nature.
David, who asks, what role should the church play in responding to the present issues around racial animosity and reconciliation in the world? State issues, Tom? Wow. These are huge questions. And I'm sure there are many people in America listening or watching, indeed.
I've got one or two American friends, one in San Francisco, I think, who said she was going to be watching and one in the bend, Oregon, who may be watching, as well as a friend in New York. And I think he and his family may be watching. So hi, guys.
Nice to be able to be in touch with you.
But we have obviously been horrified at everything that's been going on. And particularly, the thing that really goals me is that I remember, I was around, I'm old enough to remember when Martin Luther King was shot in 1968.
I happened to be in Toronto in Canada at the time. And I remember the great crowd the next day in Nathan Phillips Square in downtown Toronto with tens of thousands of people all sitting there. And I was thinking, we shall overcome.
And there was a sense then that, okay, Martin Luther King has died and horrible as that, but this is going to be an end of it.
And from now on, it's all going to be all right. And I look back 50 years and I say, what's changed? How has that been the case? And I really don't know the answer to that.
But I do know, and this is a hard thing to say, but the churches ever since the Reformation have accidentally colluded.
With the division of worshipers themselves into different ethnic linguistic, et cetera groups, because the imperative in the 16th century to worship in one's own language meant that you had a German speaking church, a Czech church, an English church, a French church, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, which then when it spreads worldwide can quite easily become, oh, well, they're down the road. So they're the ones from Egypt or they're the ones from India.
So they do their thing.
And we may wave at them, but we're not actually engaging with them. And quite accidentally, this wasn't anybody's game plan, I think.
That then was picked up by some of the racialist theories of Darwinism in the 19th century to say, oh, well, the races are actually different. And the people like that have to have that place in society. And people like us have to have this place in society.
And guess who normally came out on top, of course, white Anglo-Saxon Protestants as usual.
And the churches have not preached against that, because for some reason, I mean, I've just written a commentary on Galatians, as you know, and in Galatians, it's so clear, there is neither June or Greek slave nor free, no male and female. You're all one in Messiah Jesus.
But that has got drowned out by the language of salvation of going to heaven or being saved by grace through faith.
Now, I'm all for being saved by grace through faith. That's absolutely there.
But part of the point of that is that we are not saved.
We are not graced by being born with one particular skin color or whatever. Has that been preached in our churches? I don't think it has.
I've heard many sermons on Romans and Galatians. I've hardly ever heard people get to that particular point. But in the first century, that was so vital.
That Paul says in Romans 15, which is the climax of Romans. This is all said that with one heart and voice, you made together worship and glorify the God who is the father of Jesus. So I think the church has to look in the mirror and say, hang on, we have not been doing this right.
We have not encouraged and fostered the multi ethnic community, which was the original New Testament vision for the church.
And then as a result, society has just gone its own way. And we've had Chinese churches, we've had black churches, we've had this, we've had that, we've had the other.
And okay, there are different styles of worship, which we may like, but we need all of us to remind ourselves that this isn't good enough. We need one another. The church is designed at Le Polychrome because the whole point about the church is that it's the model of the genuine new humanity of every nation and kindred and tribe and tongue.
It says so in the book of Revelation. And if we took that seriously, but that at the center of the agenda, that would send a signal out into the wider world. So I was delighted 10 years ago, whenever it was, when John sent him who became Archbishop of York, 50 years ago, Michael Ramsey, their Archbishop had said, there will come a time when a black African will become Archbishop of York and sent him who was able to say, we've at least done that.
Now, please can we move on from there? So I think that is absolutely vital. And maybe this will be a further wake up call, but I think there's some hard questions to be asked sociologically and social psychologically as well. And not just in America, though, obviously it's been a big issue in America.
I suppose the question that comes to mind though is as you see this outpouring of grief and anger, absolutely, justifiably and understandably across many cities and so on. How do we express that? How should Christians aim to make sure that that is a redemptive force rather than simply a reaction? The model here, I think, is Jesus himself, because as I've argued in various places, Jesus was what I call a double revolutionary. When Jesus announced God's kingdom, this meant that God is king and Caesar isn't and Herod isn't, and none of you lot running the temple are in charge actually because this is God's kingdom.
And that's a revolutionary message. Now, so far, Jesus might have been on the same page as the violent revolutionaries of his day, of whom there were many and different warring groups within them as well as we know from the historian Josephus. But Jesus then also said, and by the way, this kingdom doesn't come through that kind of violence that some of you are wanting to do.
This kingdom comes like a seed growing secretly. It comes like a farmer out in his field sowing and some fails and some has a great crop. It's like a father with two sons and it's like a person is throwing a wedding banquet for their son and so on.
And all these images are ways of saying yes to the kingdom, which is the revolutionary thing that says that the present power brokers aren't in fact in charge because God is in charge, but no to the way that people are normally doing it. And that of course is what Martin Luther King did so well, and he was caught on this by the Black power leaders in the 60s. I remember it only too well.
They said, oh, you're just a wimp because you believe in non-violence and obviously nothing's going to change until we actually get to real violence. Same thing with Desmond Tutu in South Africa, who was caught all the names under the sun not only by the white supremacists, but also by the hard line people of violence from the black communities. And he stuck to the Jesus shaped line and somehow we have to articulate what that's going to look like for the next generation.
And that will be different in different contexts. I suspect different in different cities in America. In the northwest, it wouldn't be the same as in say Atlanta or Birmingham, Alabama, where I was just a few months ago and I saw some of the Martin Luther King exhibits and some of the key sites there.
So I think there's a lot to be learned, but that model of Jesus announcing the kingdom, which is the basic revolutionary message that the power break brokers are getting it wrong and there is a different way. But then the double revolution of saying that we mustn't do it that way pointing the finger at the people of violence. And you then see the same turnaround in Saul of Tarsus, who was a violent zealot, who then became Paul the Apostle, the Apostle of the love of God.
Perhaps towards the end of the show, we can pray for that situation, which is obviously on so many people's hearts and minds at the moment. We've got another question though, do you want to do this for me? Yeah, this question is actually back to some biblical exegesis. Now it's come from a member of our church family.
I mentioned that we're studying the book of Acts.
And Margaret in Woking says that she's rereading your commentary, early church letters for everyone. And having just finished Peter's second letter, I feel again that I'd like to know so much more about his later life, where he traveled to as well as Rome.
He features prominently in the early chapters of Acts and then almost disappears. Could you tell us what scholars know about Peter beyond what we learn in the New Testament and all his letters also written mainly in prison? How do we know about his crucifixion? There you go, there's plenty to have a go up there. The answer is sadly we don't really know about very much of that.
The legends about Peter get going sometime in the second century.
And you can put together a kind of collage of the different things that people came to believe. I think it is highly likely that he died as a martyr in either Nero's persecution or one of the persecutions of the time in Rome.
We don't actually have firsthand evidence of that. There are archaeological excavations and they think they may have found his tomb, etc. I'm not sure that that's been verified.
But Acts itself is quite secretive about it.
As you know in Acts 12 when Peter was about to be killed and he gets out of jail free and he comes and knocks on the door and the maid doesn't have a nickname because she's so excited. It's a rather funny scene.
It simply says at the end that he left and went somewhere else.
It doesn't say where. Why did Luke put it like that? Was it because Peter then went to Rome? Because of course Peter is then back in Jerusalem for Acts 15 which is the so-called apostolic conference and Paul in Galatians mentions meeting Peter and James and John in Galatians chapter 2, which I think is the meeting described in Acts chapter 11, whether the so-called famine visit.
So Peter seems to be too and fro.
But I'm afraid this is just typical of ancient history. I studied ancient history as my first degree.
There's all sorts of things that we would love to know that we just don't have the evidence. And maybe somebody will find a manuscript, a text, a stone, something which will tell us. But I would like to know the answers as well.
So I'm sorry Margaret. I don't have a huge amount of information.
Of course people have written books, putting together the legends.
And yes, you can spin that one out.
But they are just that, they're legends. They don't have the same character of solid historical evidence that we've got in the New Testament itself.
And as to whether his letters are written from prison. I don't see any reason why they should have been. But I couldn't put my hand on my heart and say that they definitely weren't either.
Well just a reminder, if you're watching live, you can ask a question too. Feel free to place it in the comments wherever you're watching this Facebook live video. And again, you can subscribe to the podcast and catch up on all kinds of other questions too.
That's by visiting askentwright.com. Okay, another question. Okay, well actually I'm going to sneak in one from our own family here. Take full advantage.
One of the things that we've started doing more as a family since this pandemic started and we've been shot together in our home is reading the Bible at meal times together. And I'm packing some of the stories and it generates great conversations among our children and among us and actually helps us to see things in the text that perhaps we haven't noticed before the children draw out. And one of the things that was being asked around our dinner table was we've often wondered how, well we've been wondering how these transformative encounters with Jesus in the gospel such as you know the woman at the well the blind man and so on.
How they went on in their faith because we know that we all need nurturing and building up. It's why we gather together and why we listen to preaching and we read books and we do all sorts of things to enhance our faith and grow deeper in our faith. What about those people they had a kind of almost like a flash encounter with Jesus that changed their life.
But what can we know about how their faith was nurtured. That's another great question and again I wish I had more detail to answer it with but it looks as though in the early church after the resurrection of the central Jesus and after the gift of the Spirit, there were already little cells of Jesus followers. And if you look at Matthew's gospel, some of the instructions which Matthew records Jesus is giving.
For instance in Matthew chapter 18 when it's about forgiveness and relations within the community. It looks as though these are instructions for little groups Jesus says where two or three gather in my name I'm there in their midst. And it says though when Jesus has been in a town or a village and when he's announced the kingdom and when people have believed it, some people then get called to follow him and go around with him.
Most people get called to stay where they are and be part of this little cell group. This little group of double revolutionaries if you like. This little group of Jesus shaped kingdom of God people and they have been taught by Jesus how to be that sort of person and no doubt they're wrestling with them.
And trying to remember the stories Jesus told and some of the one liners that he gave as he went around and they're living on that. And then after Pentecost when things really take off, then those little cells become part of a much larger movement so that there is already a dispersed church in Jerusalem, in Samaria, in Galilee and so on ready to go and do all sorts of new things. Now of course knowing what I know and know what you know about pastoral work, you can't assume that therefore everything is just going to work out fine and that everyone who's ever met Jesus will stay as a faithful follower forever and ever are men.
Certainly the history of the church doesn't encourage us to think that for a moment and how we know things are in our own lives likewise. But I think that's the key that Jesus seems to have had this vision of starting these little groups wherever he went and saying now here's how you are to live amongst yourselves as my followers as as kingdom people but a different sort of kingdom people. And whenever you meet to pray, here's the prayer you pray, and when you meet in my name, I am there in the midst.
That's a remarkable thing.
And I think they clung on to that promise and they found his presence with them. And then when the spirit was given off to Pentecost, then they realized how it was all to work.
That's I think how it must have been. We've got another question that's coming on the issue of coronavirus so returning to that someone asks simply the question, do you think it's Craig actually do you think there will be a revival because of COVID-19 now there's been lots of speculation I suppose about what God might be doing in and through this whole unusual moment. I suppose there's always that danger of being too speculative and claiming to know exactly what's going on but I think there are these hopes like perhaps Craig has that even though we're not able to meet as a church, actually this will be sparking the kind of questions in people's minds and hearts that might actually provoke some kind of a response in the long run.
Yes, I'm sure that may happen and let me say when we're talking about what might God be doing, I really do want to stress God is God. I'm not his private advisor. If God wants to do A or B or C, that is God's business and I will pray thy kingdom come thy will be done on earth as in heaven.
And it's up to God as to what that will is and how that prayer gets answered. So there is a danger though, and one of the things I try to nail in the book, that people say because God is sovereign, if X and Y and Z have happened, this must be because God wanted them or at least permitted them. Therefore, there must have been a reason for that.
Therefore, we must be able to figure out what that was. And the short answer to that is go and read the book of Job.
Because even at the end of the book of Job, it's not really quite clear exactly what it was all about.
And I think that's part of the point that there are many, many things that happen that we can't and shouldn't try to find a nice rational answer.
This has happened so that this could happen so that that could happen. Now, if out of tragedy and sorrow, God wants to do something radically new.
Well, that's characteristic.
We see it in the cross specifically that one of the worst things, the worst thing that human beings ever could do, who'sifying the Son of God, turned out to be in the strange mercy of God, one of the most amazing and fruitful and life enhancing things that we could ever possibly imagine. So if God wants to do that, that's fine.
But I'm not holding my breath. We've had a couple of other big different crises in the last 20 years. We had 9.11, obviously at the beginning of the present century.
And then in 2008, we had a major global financial crash. On both occasions, the Western world got it wrong. In the first case, we went to war on Iraq and dropped bombs on a lot of civilians and goodness knows what.
And we scared up crazy new groups. The last state has been worse than the first. After 2008, when the poorest people in the world really desperately needed help, the people who got the help with the richest people in the world, who asked the government for handouts and they got them and they went back to business as usual, while the poor got poorer in the background and nobody seemed to pay much attention.
So I don't think we can say simply, ah, here's a crisis. So God is now going to do something great through it. Of course, if people realize just how close to death we all live all the time, I would say actually you should think that every time you get in the car and drive down a motorway, but still, and many other things that we do every day that are actually quite risky and dangerous too.
But yes, if we are alerted to our mortality and made to think about, hang on, what is life and death?
Well, good. And the churches should be there to help gently, not to ram it down their throats now that you've thought about COVID, now it's time to get to the gospel. Because that's just going to be counterproductive, certainly in any society that I know.
So that I think the idea that we can see a purpose is a bit too far, a bit too fast.
I think what we are called to do is be reticent and be humble and say, we live in a very strange world. We believe in the sovereignty of God, but the sovereignty of God is defined by Jesus, by who he is and what he did and what he suffered, not thinking of God as the master mechanic who presses the buttons and pulls the levers and makes everything happen.
That's just the wrong image of the divine sovereignty. So we have to be very, very careful before we second guess. At the same time, we should pray for every opportunity, of course, for more people to hear about Jesus and to come to believe.
That's a given.
And obviously, we do believe God is in the business of redeeming the worst things. That's the story at the center of it all.
What I love about the show we do together, the Ask Enthi Right Anything podcast, Tom, is that it's not just Christians, but it's people of other faith traditions, agnostics, skeptics, seekers who who listen along and who offered us the questions. And I think we've got one here from Adam, who's asking the question, oh, it's just going to be good. Oh, yes, there it is.
Who I believe is probably a skeptic asking this actually from the feed that going out on the Christian evidence society and says, now, Dr. Robert Price, who's a well known skeptic, calls rather cheeky, calls Tom empty wrong because he thinks that first century Judaism was kept completely free from the influence of paganism altogether. But nothing could be further from the truth, says Adam. So he's saying that Robert Price claims that you say that first century Judaism was kept completely free from the influence of paganism.
Now, I happen to know that Rob Price is a Jesus mythicist and believes that the stories of Jesus that were created, essentially were importing other pagan myths of the time, be they Babylonian, Egyptian motifs, which were eventually put together in what we receive as the gospel. So now that let's accept it is in scholarship, a very non mainstream view to put it mildly. But what's your response to this sort of thing and how are you going to claim back the title, empty right, rather than empty wrong.
I think there was a website called empty wrong. I'm not sure if it's if it's done by that person or not. I on principle have never looked at it, but then I hardly ever hardly ever look at vlog sites anyway.
I just have a very busy life and you know, there's no need to get wound up about that sort of thing. But it's very hard because I have never said that there's a kind of a hermetic seal preventing pagan ideas from getting the Jewish world. It might be perhaps a riff on some of the things I've said about Jewish views of resurrection.
I know some skeptics in America and elsewhere have come back at me on the meaning of resurrection. And so what we're saying actually happened to Jesus, etc, etc. But it's pretty clear.
I mean, if Jesus had wanted to take his disciples to see a play by Euripides on stage, they could have just walked down the road from their base in Galilee to make sure on just the same. And so just south of the Lake of Galilee, where there was a full Greek style theatre and there were many other such places and in Jerusalem as well. And there were gymnasia and that's part of the problem that the Maccabees face two centuries before Jesus was the Hellenization.
And as they saw it, the paganization of the Jewish homeland. Although the idea of a Jewish homeland as well isn't exactly right. It wasn't a land with boundaries saying Jews inside here, everybody else out.
The Jewish homeland was basically Jerusalem and its surrounding area and Galilee and that bits of that are out. But even in Galilee, though Nazareth seems to have been a fairly orthodox Jewish town, just up the road walking distance away is Cephyrus, which was a major centre of recoroment culture. So I don't know where that idea has come from, certainly I've never said it.
And it's not part of anything that would be load bearing for a presentation about Jesus. But let me say this about the mythicists and I haven't read very much of that. Because I'm an ancient historian, I'm trying the whole time to live in the world of the actual sources.
I want every coin, every inscription, every document from whatever source it is. I don't know if you can see behind my head on the top shelf back there is a lot of Greco-Roman classics, the Latin and Greek classics. I love that stuff.
I want to know more and more about it.
And when I read it, I then look at the Jewish literature of the time and I say, well, yes, here's this book Wisdom of Solomon. In some ways it's very like Paul.
In other ways it's got signs of Stoic influence.
In other ways it's got signs of Platonic influence, which I don't see in Paul or not in that way or Paul arguing with it perhaps but not dependent on it. And so on.
And if that's true of Wisdom of Solomon, it's true of many other writings as well, particularly the historian Josephus I've mentioned before.
But the crucial thing is surely this. The mythicists, if I understand them are right, tend to say that the gospel stories were invented, let's say, 50 or 100 years later, in order to start a new religion, a religion of following this mythical character Jesus.
But the thing is that early Christianity wasn't a religion, either in the modern sense or in the ancient sense. They didn't have animal sacrifices, they didn't have church buildings, they didn't have a priestly caste, they didn't go and consult oracles. It didn't look like what the ancient world thought of as religion at all.
It looked like a cross between a kind of a synagogue community, but this was for everybody or a philosophical school in that they were teaching people, teaching to read often enough.
And then particularly a political organization, because any society that brought together this ramshackle collection of Jews and Greeks and slaves and free and men and women all muddled in together, living a life of obedience to Jesus, a life of worship, but a life of service to the poor and to those who are sick and needy. Nobody had ever seen anything like this before.
They wouldn't have said, oh, it's a new religion. They would have said, what on earth do they think they're doing?
And they said, well, following Jesus. Now, the thing that they were doing in following Jesus was radically new in order to explain it.
If you take away Jesus, you're going to have to invent somebody else roughly the same sort of person, probably with the same name as well. And once you've done that, of course, the thing becomes absurd. You've got another question? I think Lucy.
Oh, I think we're going to do this one here.
Oh, OK. Yeah, we've had a question from Elizabeth Argus.
And her question is about the Beatitudes in Matthew 5. She says, can you explain what the phrase poor in spirit means? She says, it's the first beatitude, so it must be the foundational one. Yes, I'm not sure it's the foundational one. I've never been clear as to whether they build out like that in a kind of reverse pyramid or whether, in fact, if you translate them back into Aramaic, which I know some people have tried to do, then they do have a kind of idea that Jesus was a wandering teacher in the days before print media, let alone radio, let alone podcasts or whatever, and wandering teachers in that sort of context say the same things again and again and again, but often they come out slightly differently.
So when we compare the feminine Matthew with the equivalent material in Luke, it comes out slightly differently. And I don't think that this means that one of them got it right and the other one got it wrong. It just means Jesus was always saying this kind of thing.
But here's the thing about both pure in heart, or, sorry, poor in spirit and then pure in heart later on. But the others as well, we are inclined, and for many years I was inclined, to look at the Beatitudes and think of them in terms of here of the moral qualities to which I should aspire. Well, I still want to say yes, we should aspire to these qualities, but the danger then is that we think that these are the moral exams which we have to pass in order to qualify for to live with God or whatever it is.
That's not what this list is about at all. This list is about this is what the kingdom of God looks like. And I think Justin's heard me say this before, maybe some other listeners have as well, but people often say, why does God allow this to happen? Why did God let the Holocaust happen? Why doesn't God step in and stop whatever's going on? And people want God to press the button which says, freeze the frame right there, stop now, or they want God to send in the tanks.
And the Sermon on the Mount is about the quality of people through whom God brings God's kingdom. And I think the poor in spirit there is about humility. I think it's about people who are prepared to say, okay, my ideas of what the kingdom of God would look like would be thus and so.
You know, people sometimes play the game, if I were king for a day, what would I do, etc, etc. The answer is no, I'm not going to go there. I'm going to take my instructions for the shape of what the kingdom should look like from God himself, even if that means some of my cherished ideals have to be set aside or lost entirely.
And so the Sermon on the Mount is saying, when God wants to change the world, he doesn't send in the tanks. He sends in the poor in spirit, the meek, the humble, the brokenhearted, the mourners, the hungry for justice people, the peacemakers, and they are the ones through whom the world gets changed. And maybe it does, if not start with, at least focus on the poor in spirit, because it's one of the interesting things about early Christianity, that humility was never seen as a virtue in the ancient world.
The Greeks, the Romans, humility, that's for the birds, you've got to stand up for yourself. But you see it coming through in Paul, where the idea of when I am weak, then I am strong. Where did Paul get that idea from? I think it comes ultimately from Jesus about the poor in spirit, who are the ones through whom God can then do extraordinary things in the world.
Did you know that this month marks the third anniversary of Premier Insight? It's a real season of celebration, but looking ahead there's also a challenge I need to share with you today. Due to rising costs and the pressure of inflation, there's a $37,500 need that must be met this month to keep Premier Insight moving forward with strength. The good news is that we've been offered a $3,750 matching grant, 10% of our need, which effectively doubles your gift.
But whatever we fail to match, we lose. That's why I'm asking you to give a special anniversary gift to keep programs like this NT Right podcast on the air and equip a generation of Christians to live out their faith with clarity, conviction and confidence. In fact, your gift is so important.
We want to say thanks for whatever you give today by sending your copy of Pastor Tim Keller's best-selling book, The Reason for God, Belief in an Age of Skepticism, a must-read for every thinking Christian.
To request your copy, simply visit premier insight.org slash NT Right. Once again, that's premier insight.org slash NT Right.
Thank you for your generosity and partnership. Enjoy the rest of your episode.
Fantastic.
We've got a question here from a fairly young person, Noah, is asking a question and it's a very direct, simple question.
If we live forever in heaven, and you might want to talk about that, you've written a lot about that whole concept, but he says, if we live forever in heaven, wouldn't it become boring after a while? The answer is yes, Noah, the normal views that people have of heaven might well become boring. There was a far side cartoon some years ago, which had a guy sitting on a cloud, looking around him and saying, gee, I wish I brought a magazine.
And I get that. But of course, you can then deconstruct that by saying, well, God would make it exciting anyway. Well, yes and no, and I think mostly no.
I think all that we know about, what we already know about God, if God is the creator of the world, God made this amazing place full of music and laughter, full of extraordinary creatures like elephants and giraffes and anteaters and so on. And full of people like you and me, and people who are interesting and different, and people who know in their bones that they're made to do certain things. You know, my wife and I have moved so often that we're not great gardeners, and we've just moved to Oxford, recently.
We've just planted a couple of roses and we're discovering again the joy of even a simple, tiny little garden. Hey, we can do things. And there's all sorts of things that humans know in their bones that they're meant to do.
And I think that's because we are image bearers. We are called to be creative like God, reflecting God's creative stewardship into the world. And I really think if we know anything about God, the world to come, which is the new heavens and the new earth, when heaven and earth come together, that's what we promise, not this going to heaven forever stuff, but the new creation.
That will be a time when everything that we glimpse of purpose and vocation and possibility and art and music and drama and so on, that will be enhanced. It will be much more than we have at the moment. Just as Jesus resurrection body was more, not less than his pre resurrection body was transformed, was still physical, but now had other properties.
So I think our future life will be like this present one, only much, much more so. And it will be richly extraordinary in terms of all the things that we will be called to do to make God's glory fill his new creation. I can understand people who think that if that life is simply an eternal church service of the sort, we normally experience it.
We might not want to be in it forever and ever.
But we are a CS Lewis fan and I've always loved the way CS Lewis ends the Narnia books in the last battle and you see that vision of the children and Azlan going into this into aslan's country and how it says that it turned out that all of their adventures up to that point had only been the title, the cover and the title panel. And that they were starting on an adventure where every chapter was more exciting than the one before.
Yes. I think Lewis is exactly right there. And Lewis had got this vision of new creation.
He didn't follow it through in all of his writings. It's an interesting thing about Lewis and he didn't claim to be a professional theologian as it were, but he got that sense that the best is yet to be brilliant.
Tom, I want to make sure you have a chance to drink something and sip.
While you're doing
that, I'll just reiterate that if you're wanting to ask a question here on the Facebook live stream with Tom, you're welcome to put a question in the comments and they'll come through to us and we'll try and make sure to read as many as possible. Again, if you'd like to subscribe to the podcast in the newsletter of the Ask, Nt, Write, Anything Show where I sit down with Tom on a regular basis and ask these sorts of questions, then do go to askentiright.com. There's a link in the Facebook description from the show today. And just a reminder that also at ntwrightonline.org, slash askentiright.
If you go there, there's a free
e-book as well that will make its way to you if you sign up. So anyway, back to the questions and where are we going next? We're going to, ah yes, there's a rather, okay, here's one that comes around very frequently in my experience, especially among skeptics. Kevin, do you want to ask this one actually Lucy? This one here, here we go.
Okay, yeah, Kevin
Rally, he'd like to ask, how do we reconcile St Paul's attitude to slavery, obedience to the master and so on, which is often referenced in scripture? With our modern aborance of slavery, our rightly modern aborance of slavery. Yeah, I mean, this is a good question and it demands some historical background and focus. In the ancient world, anybody could become a slave.
All you had to do was lose a battle or maybe lose your job and you could just either sell yourself or somebody just corral you into being into being a slave. In other words, there wasn't a slave, I mean, there was a slave class, but it was very fluid and flexible and a lot of slaves actually either bought their freedom or were given their freedom and were able to make their way in the world. The Roman emperor Claudius, who was emperor when Paul was starting his missionary journeys, he relied for his three favorite civil servants were all freed men.
They had been slaves who'd been freed and they were very able people. So
slavery in the ancient world was very different from what we think of in terms of particularly obviously in the 18th century, the 18th and 19th century when ships would go to Africa and scoop up boatloads of unfortunate Africans and take them across to the new world, to the Caribbean and to North America and keep them as a separate cast, a separate class. And that as I said before, God bound up with all sorts of racial theories and so on.
There's
nothing racial about slavery in the ancient world. In the Mediterranean world, which Paul knew, skin pigmentation wasn't an issue. There were many, many different colours and that had nothing to do with slavery.
Now, of course, slavery was in many quarters, a pretty vile
institution because slaves were property and masters and mittresses could do literally whatever they wanted with them. And what we see in the New Testament though, has to be judged in terms of what the possibilities were at the time. An awful lot of things which today we do through machines through the internal combustion engine, through electricity, through gas, etc.
All of
that stuff was done by human beings and they would be servants or they would be slaves and there would be a sliding scale between somebody who was a slave who's actually your property, you'd still have to feed them and house them. Otherwise, they wouldn't be any used to anyway. And servants who would be working for you and there would be a graded hierarchy.
We don't much like hierarchies
but that was how the whole ancient world worked. And what Paul does is, it's rather like Jesus being a double revolutionary. Paul doesn't just say, you should all give up your slaves at once.
That would be about as much use as you or me standing up in church on the Sunday morning and saying, we all now know that car engines are polluting the atmosphere. This is clearly not God's will. So I want you to leave your cars in the church car park.
We'll have a scrap merchant come around
and we'll give you each 10 quid for them after the service because you're never going to be using those again because you're following Jesus instead. And I think most of us would say, that's actually not how to fight that particular battle. It may be that in 100 years time people will look back and say, oh, right, you were such a wimp.
In 2020, you said we didn't have to give
up our cars. We should have done. Well, I'm sorry, there is a kind of a realism about this.
And if this is why in the letter to Feilemann, the little letter at the end of the Pauline canon, Paul is very subtle about hinting what he wants Feilemann to do with his ex-slave Onesimus, who has run away and come to Paul. And Paul puts a kind of a depth charge against the whole institution. Rather like actually the philosopher Seneca was doing at the same time, those Seneca, himself had slaves.
Well, like Thomas Jefferson in America, who said that all people were equal,
but he still had slaves and he didn't exactly treat them all that well. So I'm told either. But in the middle of all of this, what we see is the gospel starting as a movement which says neither slave nor free and which then has to live with how that works out in practice.
It starts
in worshiping together. It starts, in other words, in the slaves being part of the family. And we have to think of early Christianity as a family, as brothers and sisters, recognizing and welcoming one another as such.
And then navigating the very difficult social consequences that result
from that. Because one of the things Paul was very anxious about was that the early Christians wouldn't get the reputation of being the wrong sort of revolutionaries. You're the sort who started that great riot where we had 20,000 slaves on the march, etc.
That they had long memories of
things like the Spartacus Revolution. So yes, we wish, of course, the depth charge had gone off much sooner. And actually, it was only really able to happen when we did get modern technology and machines.
So there are big questions to ask there as well, but we have to beware of moralizing
back from what we think of as 19th century slavery. And imagine that it was always just like that. I'm not excusing what they did in the ancient world.
I'm saying, let's put ourselves in Paul's
shoes and imagine what are we going to do to address that is. Yeah, I often think of it as being that Paul, as it were, was started the trajectory, if you would, of that sort of emancipation and the view that obviously is now current, but which what he was doing in his time was radical for its time in terms of the way he put slave masters on level, when it came to their worship of Christ and so on. Absolutely.
Absolutely. We've got another question here. This takes us in another direction.
Marshall asks, are other religions completely deceived? Or is it possible that they have elements that are also inspired by God? Clearly, Christianity looks at everything through Jesus. But I ask because there are many similarities between religions, almost as though God has revealed truth through them. But why would God reveal some truth but not Christ? So yeah, there's a tough one to get your teeth into.
Oh, a wonderful question. But it strikes me speaking as an ancient historian.
It strikes me as a very modern question because the concept of religion and there being different religions is an 18th century invention, which surprised a lot of people at the time.
But it's
sort of caught on because this was at a time when the popular mood in the western world was to imagine God ever more distant with daiusum or even the revived epicureanism. God is a long way away. So we do stuff down here, which is vaguely Godward related or vaguely ethically related.
And so we
call what we do down here, religions. Two things to say about that. First, that isn't what the word religion meant in the ancient world at all.
It had quite different meanings. Second, it isn't what
actually the Christian, the word that Christians used religion meant until the 18th century. If you would ask somebody in the 16th century about that religion, they would have thought you meant what liturgy do you use in your worship in church? Which is a different question.
So we need to be aware
that the way the question is phrased is very much within a modernist paradigm which sees the religions lined up and sort of ticks off different features of them. Oh, this one has this, that one has that. Now, in fact, there are radical differences, radical differences.
Obviously Christianity,
as we know it, the following Jesus movement, if you like, grows directly out of and from within the world of the ancient Jews, which is rooted in the world of ancient Israel going back to the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and the relationship between the followers of Jesus and those Jews who decided not to follow Jesus in the first century and subsequently has always been a fought and difficult one. That's a kind of a special case. But then the relationship with the prophet Muhammad and the religion we think of as Islam, that's a very different thing again.
And Islam is not just people who talk about the three monotheistic religions Christianity, Judaism and Islam. Actually, they're very different. And Islam says there is one God and Muhammad is his prophet.
Judaism says there is one God and Israel is his people. Christianity says there is one God
and Jesus of Nazareth is his son. What's more the crucified and risen Jesus of Nazareth.
And actually,
the vision of the one God and the vision of what it means to follow and serve and worship and love that God changes radically with those three different modifiers. When you then get out beyond that, treating the modern category of religion for what it is at the moment, into say Buddhism or Hinduism, those are simply radically different kinds of things all together. And it's the modernist idea of well, some monotheistic religions, some non-monotheistic, but they're all religions.
That's a way of squashing them all into a lump in order then to say as the question rather implies maybe they're all sort of the same. But here's what I would say about the sameness. All the so-called religions to use that language for the moment are in a measure responses to what Jews and Christians from the beginning have seen as the revelation of the creator God in the world.
That when we look at the world, there are signals that actually there is meaning
here. We're aware of things like justice and freedom and love and relationships and beauty. And people respond to those signals differently, sometimes within different traditions, but sometimes from what just occurs to them apparently spontaneously.
And so it doesn't surprise me that you see in
all the so-called religions signs that people are responding to these signals. Some people call them signals of transcendence. So they'd much like that language myself, but something like that in the world.
And then it comes out differently according to different cultures and so on. The
difference with the Christian faith is that it is anchored in this one man who we do know about historically and who was crucified. And the crucifixion of Jesus is about a secure historical fact as Caesar crossing the Rubicon or any of those great events in ancient Rome.
And then
that the Christians said he'd been raised from the dead. And part of the evidence for that is the new energy that they had in doing what they did in inventing a new way of being human. So I would say actually it's Jesus that makes the difference.
Jesus and him crucified and raised from the dead.
None of the other so-called great religions has anything remotely like that. People sometimes try to say, oh well the Egyptians believed in some sort of life after death.
Yeah, it's just not
the same thing. Trust me on that one. Paul can be helpful here, especially when he's at Mars Hill and he's talking to the philosophers and those who are sharing their worldviews.
And he doesn't
simply dismiss their search for truth. But he says, you've been looking around and I can see that you're after you're grasping after this. And even quotes their own philosophers and poets back to them and not by simply dismissing them but saying, but here's how that all gets fulfilled.
It's a very interesting two and fro, isn't it? Because he starts with the ought of the unknown God. Oh well, there you are. You know that there's a God you don't know.
Let me tell you about it. Fine.
Okay.
And as you say, quoting the poets. But at the same time, and many of your viewers tonight will
have been to Mars Hill in Athens. You stand on Mars Hill.
The thing you can see most prominently
is the Acropolis with the wonderful Temple of Athenae and the Parthenon and the Temple of Nike and all these other things. And Paul just says, by the way, the Almighty doesn't live in houses made with homes that lot up there. They're just a category mistake.
So it wasn't just
carrying favor. He was saying, yes, where he could say yes, know where he had to say no. And then he was telling the Jewish story with Jesus in the middle.
It's interesting at the end,
he says, God is fixed today on which he will judge the world in righteousness. That's a direct quotation from Psalm 96. And he will judge the world in which means God is going to put the world right.
Wow. Yeah. The High Court in Athens where he was thought it was their job to put things right.
Paul is saying, actually it's God's job and he's going to do it. And he's going to do it through Jesus. It's got about another 15 minutes.
So we'll keep going with a few more questions.
These are great questions. I mean, they don't admit of one line answer.
We, OK, a completely different tack here. This is a question from David, David Tusson, who asks, what does it mean to fear God? I'm comfortable with the concept of loving God, but we're told in the Bible to fear God. What does that mean? Our English word fear can slide to and fro.
And I think of the fear I was driving down the road to go to the supermarket earlier today.
And suddenly there was a police car came screaming up behind me with flashing blue lights. And my first thought was get out of the way.
My second thought was, Oh dear, did I run a red light? And I suddenly had that cold moment of fear. Of course I hadn't heard what would I do. And of course he was off of somebody else.
But there is a sort of fear, which is a panicky fear like that.
And some people think that's what fearing God is supposed to mean. And then they say, well, how can that coexist with love? And the answer is no.
In the Hebrew, which the Greek is struggling to retain there, it means reverence. It means all.
It's the kind of all that you feel when you walk into one of the most great, lovely buildings like a huge cathedral.
And you have a sense of, I ought to mind my piece of enthusiasm. I mean, yeah, it's and yet it's beautiful. You want to be there.
And yet you have a sense that you need to talk in hushed tones and be careful what you do because this place matters. Or the sense you have in front of a great painting or when you come out of a wonderful theatrical performance. And I remember once reading a review of a recital by Dietrich Fijdiska, some Schubert leader, and the writer in the newspaper said that the whole audience left in silence because it had just been such an awe-inspiring performance.
That there was no chatter. And that's that's a sort of sense that I think the fear means that when we think of being in God's presence. Wow, we need to take this very seriously.
That's what I think it's all it's about. Of course, if you then say, well, God loves me. So who cares? I can go and do what I like.
Then maybe an element of the fear of the fashion police car lights might just come into it. We've got a question in from Jeremy Perigault. He's watching over on the SBCK publishing Facebook page.
Thanks for joining us, Jeremy.
And Jeremy says, with such a Protestant slash evangelical emphasis on salvation as a cognitive understanding of key tenants. But where does that leave those with cognitive or developmental disabilities? What does saving faith look like for those who are differently abled? Great question.
But it's only one bit of Protestantism. Well, maybe it's two or three bits, but it's one sort of strand of modern rationalistic Protestantism.
That has got off on this business of you need to understand this and this and this.
I remember a talk. I'm sitting here in Oxford just about 300 yards away from where I am.
And about 50 years ago, by a wonderful old Christian scholar called John Wenham.
Some of our listeners may know him as somebody who wrote a Greek grammar among other things.
And John Wenham did a great talk on the atonement and on all the different models and theories and ideas and biblical images about the atonement, he laid this all out for about an hour. It was breathtaking.
At the end, somebody said, how much of this does somebody have to believe in order to be saved? And John smiled and said, very little.
This is something about the love of God. Jesus dying, reaching out and grasping you with love and forgiveness.
I said, here, okay, now that we've got that, we can then explore it. We don't have to believe all the theory in order to be saved. That's a mistake people often make.
People imagine that we are justified by faith, by believing in justification, by faith. We are not.
We are justified by faith by believing in Jesus and believing in Jesus means like the woman in the crowd who had the issue of blood and she comes and she touches the hem of his garment.
That's enough.
That's enough. And if later she wants to go and ask one of the disciples, just how does that work? How does his then dying on the cross kind of validate by being rescued? Well, we can talk about that.
But the important thing is just hold on and trust. And part of the point about faith is that actually the Greek word pistis doesn't simply mean a cognitive awareness of the faith.
It can go in that direction, but it means loyalty.
It means allegiance. It means sticking with this person.
You know, when beginning of John 11, Jesus says it's time to go back to Jerusalem, guys.
And they say, hang on. They want to kill you. Surely you don't want to go back there.
And Thomas says, okay, let's go so that we can die with him. That's a kind of a dogged allegiance. And it seems to me that Thomas, my namesake, is called doubting Thomas.
There's quite a lot of faith in there.
Okay, if this is where Jesus is going, we're going with him. And I think that's just fine.
That's good enough.
Yeah, a completely different subject matter now. More of an ethical question.
This comes from Joanne in West Biflete. And she says, I suffer from a rare genetic medical condition, which results in eye deterioration among other things. I'm a Christian.
My question is, why does God allow us to be born like this? And also, she asks, what are your views about stem cell imparts in terms of Christian ethics and the Bible? There's lots of research being done in this topic, and she's hopeful for it being considered. But she's getting advice from Christian friends in different directions, which are causing tension. Yeah, bless her.
Well, yeah, deep sympathy and prayerful hope for you and for anyone else in that situation. Obviously, when somebody is born with a particular medical condition that makes them unable to do and be the sort of things that most of their friends and family are able to do and be,
then there are all sorts of questions. And actually, having been a pastor for a long time, most families that I know, including my own, have somebody who has some kind of medical condition that makes you just think, why did this happen? Why did it have to be? And I don't think we're given answers to that.
As I say in the little book about the pandemic, when the disciples in Antioch heard that there was going to be a famine, they didn't say, why did God allow this?
Or was it our fault had we sinned? Or what is God trying to tell us? Or is this a sign of the end or something? They said, what can we do to help? Who is going to be at risk? What can we do to help? The who should we send? And so it seems to me when somebody is born with a particular condition, this is a sign to the rest of the family and the friends and the community, that here is somebody who needs special love and attention and care. And it's actually part of my answer to the previous question as well. One of my graduate students and his wife recently had their third child and they knew at an early stage in the pregnancy, this is going to be a baby with Down Syndrome.
And unlike some who would say, well, we'd better get rid of this unwanted distraction or whatever, they said this is a calling to be a special kind of family. My heart goes out to them. I pray for them day by day.
And I think it's a call to the community. So instead, it's like the beginning of John 9 where the disciples say whose fault was it that this man was born blind.
And Jesus says, that's the wrong question to ask.
The right question is what is God going to do with this situation? And sometimes that might mean healing and other times it might mean a new level of love and care and compassion in the immediate answer.
And so I think that's the key to the understanding of the people who are in the community and surrounding community. As to stem cells, I don't know.
I'm not a scientist. I don't know all the current research or the detail. I do know that people worry because the stem cells come from unborn fetuses.
And the idea of using human tissue in that way is a very difficult knife edge ethical decision. I do know that some of the research indicates that some use of some such material could bring real healing for people further on down the track. I do not have an inside track on that particular topic, but I do worry that sometimes with science in general, there's a sense that we the scientists can do whatever we like.
So if we choose to manipulate this bit of human tissue this way, well, don't worry because it'll be it'll work out and be good for many people in the long run. Well, maybe, but maybe not. One of the things we're learning in the pandemic, I think, is that the science isn't as easy as all that.
And the scientists are forming hypotheses and they need to factor in the ethical issues as well. So I'm sorry, I don't have the absolute answer on that. You probably wouldn't trust me if I played that I did.
But I think it's something we need to pray for the scientists and with them and make sure that if that's a concern for us that we are catching up with the best and most recent research and Christian writing on the subject. Thank you so much, Tom, for your time. We're going to go to a final question in just a moment.
Just just another quick word though to say if you're watching and you've been enjoying tonight's broadcast, do feel free to get more of them by listening to the Ask,
EntiWrite Anything podcast. Again, the link is in the description. AskentiWrite.com. And if you subscribe to the newsletter, you'll also be kept up to date with what's going on with the show and any additional content we put out there, including things like today's broadcast.
So I just also want to give a shout out to our youth group who are watching tonight, Tom. They're working United Reform Church youth group, blog with the only youth worker. And there was a question, but I'm not going to bring it now because I know we're going to be dealing with, I think, on a podcast we've already recorded and we'll go out soon, which is on that thorny question of the book in the book of Acts, and a nice and sefira and what happens to them.
So we'll leave that because I know it's getting dealt with either has been or will be dealt with on a new podcast because it's come up before. But in any case, I thought a good question maybe to end our time with is this one from Matthew Collins, who has submitted this over at the EntiWrite online Facebook page and says, how does one who has walked away from faith in the past come back to faith and receive Jesus? How does one become a Christian? It's a fairly direct question. I suppose in the sense of, well, if you have had faith and you feel like it slipped away for whatever reason or you lost it entirely, but you've somehow come back to wanting something again, what would you what would you be your practical advice for someone who wants to reconnect with that faith? And well, as he says, to become a Christian.
Yes, the phrase become a Christian means many different things to many different people. A Christian is basically somebody who who clings on to Jesus, who wants to be a Jesus follower, a Jesus friend, who clings on to him because, as the disciples say to who else should we go, you have the words of eternal life. We're not finding this in anyone else.
Of course, all Christians that I know oscillate and wobble about in their faith. One of the things that I love about the Lord's Prayer, which Jesus gave us, is that I say it every day, sometimes several times a day, that it has this cause, forgive us our trespasses, because I always need that.
Every time I come back to say it, there's been something that I've done that I've messed up.
So in a sense, we all wobble away from faith, and we all, if we want to stick with it, have to come back again.
It doesn't mean we've stopped being Christians in the meantime. Of course, it may be that somebody had only a superficial outward experience, and it never really went very deep.
They were never actually immersed in the love of God in a life transforming way, in the way that being a Christian ought to mean. But again, it's very much an individual personality thing. And anyone asking me that question, if they were here in the room, I would say, let's put the kettle on, let's have a cup of coffee, and let's just talk about where you've come from, what your personal history is, what got in the way, what was worrying you, what in your background has made this difficult or easy or whatever.
And people often email me and ask me these detailed pastoral questions, say, I cannot be your pastor at long distance. Pastoral work happens face to face, ideally. You can do a bit on the phone, but really it has to be somebody who can get to know you and who you can trust and share your innermost secret sith.
And then they may tell you, you know, it looks to me as though you've never really received the presence and love of Jesus Christ into your innermost being. And it's time you did and here's how. Or it may be that there are, that they will see that there really is a deep, a deep love of God somewhere, but it's been buried under all sorts of other things.
And you need to find out what's cluttering up the mess and get back to that deeply buried thing. So there are all these different images one can use. At the heart of it, I've mentioned the Lord's Prayer.
I would say go back to praying the Lord's Prayer and pray it slowly. Pray it thoughtfully. Maybe clause by clause.
Breathe in, breathe out. Think about your world, your life. Hold it in the presence of God and then go on to the next clause.
How would be thy name? Whichever one you're at. That's one way of getting, as it were, back in or in for the first time in it. Jesus gave his followers that prayer.
There was a reason why he did that. And that's a great way in. Another way is simply to take one or other of the four gospels and again read it slowly and prayerfully.
You know, switch off the machines. Don't have any screens operative. Put the phone in the other room.
Shut the door.
Say, Lord Jesus Christ, son of a living God. Have mercy on me, a sinner.
And now show me.
And then read through Mark, which is the shortest, or John, which is the richest, perhaps, or Matthew or Luke. And just see what it is that Jesus is saying to you and see what happens when with that story you find yourself at the foot of the cross.
And when you come to the foot of the cross in that story, hold on and don't let go and say you did all that for me and then see what happens when you get through to the resurrection and the new life that isn't just Jesus's new life, but is yours as well. These are the sort of things that any pastor might say and their generalizations because I don't know this person who's asked the question. But whether it's been five minutes since you drifted away or five or 50 years since you drifted away, there is a way back.
One of the first child's choruses that I learned when I was very young, there's a way back to God from the dark arts of sin. There's a door that is open and you make of in that Calvary's cross is where you begin when you come as a sin as a Jesus. That is as true now as it was when I first sang it.
Oh, maybe 60 years ago now. But out of that, there is that great wisdom in the Gospels and the Lord's Prayer. Well, I do hope that this has been a helpful time for those who've been watching.
Thank you very much for joining us on this live stream. Questions have come in from all over the world. And of course, this will remain up on these Facebook pages where we've been posting this.
And of course, you can send other people to go and watch and do feel free to ask more questions by actually getting in touch via the podcast. That's AskNTRight.com. If you go there, you can subscribe to the podcast. You can also register for the newsletter, which also gets you access to actually asking questions on the show.
So do make sure to do that if you like more of the same sort of thing. Tom, it's been so good spending some time with you. Thank you for the time.
I did say earlier on, it would be lovely if you would close our time in prayer. Obviously, we're all thinking about lots of things, coronavirus, the pandemic, but also these recent events in the USA. And it may be those for whom they're watching and they're not necessarily, wouldn't call themselves, Jesus followers, at this point in time.
Facebook is a very wide open space where many people may be just coming along and seeing what's going on. And if there's something you could pray for those who have maybe have sent something of what this Christian life might be about, it would be great to include that as well. And let me just give a little shout out to my colleagues at SBCK and Zondovan.
Absolutely. They have rushed out this little book, God and the Pandemic, in breakneck speed. I don't think I've ever known a book yet published so quickly and blessed them.
They've worked very hard on it. So thank you to them. And I hope that that will be a blessing to many.
So let's then just draw this together in a prayer. Gracious heavenly Father, you have made us in your image and you've called us to love you, to follow you, to serve you. You have revealed yourself to us in the Lord Jesus, in his life and his death and his resurrection and his ascension.
You have promised us the gift of the Spirit to live within us. Father, we claim all these things now. As we're in a mess, we're in a mess about this disease, which is taking over so much and which has destroyed lives and ruining lives and making things a misery, even for those who aren't themselves infected as yet.
We pray for the doctors and nurses. We pray for those who are dying and for those who grieve over, those who have gone. We pray that you will soon make a way through, whether through a vaccine or whatever, a make a way for us to resume some sort of normal life.
And Father, please teach us, teach your church, teach your world how to be in the time after this pandemic, how not to forget any lessons that you want us to learn. But we pray too for the great country of the United States of America, which suddenly has gone into this terrible convulsion as happens from time to time that we grieve over it nonetheless. We pray for those directly affected, those who feel that their own lives may be threatened, and those who feel just puzzled and confused.
We pray for peace and healing and love and for the churches to find ways of setting the example that the world needs, of what it means to live together as family and to love one another as brothers and sisters. Gracious Father, it is a great country. We pray that it will have a great future coming around this corner and out into a new day.
And we pray, Father, for any who are watching, listening, who are not sure, who are on the edge, who are thinking about Jesus, thinking about faith, thinking about who they are and who you might want them to be, even assuming they can guess who you might be. Gracious Lord, open their eyes, open their hearts. May the gospel do its work in their hearts and minds, and may they sense and feel and know and respond to your love, which is shown in the death of Jesus.
So, Father, may your blessing be upon us. So, Lord Jesus, may your blessing be upon us. So, Holy Spirit, may your blessing be upon us.
May we be faithful to your calling and fruitful in your kingdom and cheerful in your service. We pray at all in Jesus' name. Amen.
Amen. I know that lockdown is still a busy time for you, but I know that we're getting lots of appreciative comments coming in via Facebook for tonight's event. Really do appreciate it.
All the very best. We hope to catch up with you before too long.
Yes, indeed.
Thank you for setting all this up and forgetting all the technology right, et cetera.
And great to be with you and greetings to all out there.

More From Ask NT Wright Anything

#188 Jean Vanier and when leaders let us down (Replay)
#188 Jean Vanier and when leaders let us down (Replay)
Ask NT Wright Anything
October 5, 2023
From 2020: In the wake of the news that L’Arche founder Jean Vanier was responsible for sexual abuse of women during his ministry, Tom Wright responde
#189 Brexit, Abortion, Race and Critical Theory (Replay)
#189 Brexit, Abortion, Race and Critical Theory (Replay)
Ask NT Wright Anything
October 12, 2023
From the archives: Tom tackles a variety of questions on ‘hot button’ political issues that have been sent in, including the place of faith in politic
#190 Ananias and Sapphira and more tricky theological questions (Replay)
#190 Ananias and Sapphira and more tricky theological questions (Replay)
Ask NT Wright Anything
October 19, 2023
From the archives: How do we reconcile the New Testament account of Ananias and Sapphira being struck dead with the cross-shaped vision of a God of lo
#186 Has the resurrection been debunked? (Replay)
#186 Has the resurrection been debunked? (Replay)
Ask NT Wright Anything
September 21, 2023
From 2020: It’s Eastertide so Tom is answering questions on the resurrection, including one listener who believes that the evidence of the women at th
#185 Questions on Crucifixion and Atonement (Replay)
#185 Questions on Crucifixion and Atonement (Replay)
Ask NT Wright Anything
September 14, 2023
From the archives: Just in time for Easter we bring you a show (recorded before lockdown) in which Tom answers listener questions on the crucifixion,
#184 An Evening With NT Wright live in London (Replay)
#184 An Evening With NT Wright live in London (Replay)
Ask NT Wright Anything
September 7, 2023
From the archives, from 2020: In a bonus podcast special we bring you ‘An Evening with NT Wright’, hosted by SPCK and recorded live at Westminster Cha
More From "Ask NT Wright Anything"

More on OpenTheo

Full Preterism/Dispensationalism: Hermeneutics that Crucified Jesus
Full Preterism/Dispensationalism: Hermeneutics that Crucified Jesus
For The King
June 29, 2025
Full Preterism is heresy and many forms of Dispensationalism is as well. We hope to show why both are insufficient for understanding biblical prophecy
If Jesus Is God, Why Didn’t He Know the Day of His Return?
If Jesus Is God, Why Didn’t He Know the Day of His Return?
#STRask
June 12, 2025
Questions about why Jesus didn’t know the day of his return if he truly is God, and why it’s important for Jesus to be both fully God and fully man.  
Licona and Martin: A Dialogue on Jesus' Claim of Divinity
Licona and Martin: A Dialogue on Jesus' Claim of Divinity
Risen Jesus
May 14, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Dale Martin discuss their differing views of Jesus’ claim of divinity. Licona proposes that “it is more proba
What Evidence Can I Give for Objective Morality?
What Evidence Can I Give for Objective Morality?
#STRask
June 23, 2025
Questions about how to respond to someone who’s asking for evidence for objective morality, what to say to atheists who counter the moral argument for
What Are the Top Five Things to Consider Before Joining a Church?
What Are the Top Five Things to Consider Before Joining a Church?
#STRask
July 3, 2025
Questions about the top five things to consider before joining a church when coming out of the NAR movement, and thoughts regarding a church putting o
Jay Richards: Economics, Gender Ideology and MAHA
Jay Richards: Economics, Gender Ideology and MAHA
Knight & Rose Show
April 19, 2025
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose welcome Heritage Foundation policy expert Dr. Jay Richards to discuss policy and culture. Jay explains how economic fre
Can Secular Books Assist Our Christian Walk?
Can Secular Books Assist Our Christian Walk?
#STRask
April 17, 2025
Questions about how secular books assist our Christian walk and how Greg studies the Bible.   * How do secular books like Atomic Habits assist our Ch
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Two: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Two: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
Risen Jesus
June 4, 2025
The following episode is part two of the debate between atheist philosopher Dr. Evan Fales and Dr. Mike Licona in 2014 at the University of St. Thoman
Why Do Some Churches Say You Need to Keep the Mosaic Law?
Why Do Some Churches Say You Need to Keep the Mosaic Law?
#STRask
May 5, 2025
Questions about why some churches say you need to keep the Mosaic Law and the gospel of Christ to be saved, and whether or not it’s inappropriate for
Can a Deceased Person’s Soul Live On in the Recipient of His Heart?
Can a Deceased Person’s Soul Live On in the Recipient of His Heart?
#STRask
May 12, 2025
Questions about whether a deceased person’s soul can live on in the recipient of his heart, whether 1 Corinthians 15:44 confirms that babies in the wo
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Four: Licona Responds and Q&A
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Four: Licona Responds and Q&A
Risen Jesus
June 18, 2025
Today is the final episode in our four-part series covering the 2014 debate between Dr. Michael Licona and Dr. Evan Fales. In this hour-long episode,
Licona vs. Shapiro: Is Belief in the Resurrection Justified?
Licona vs. Shapiro: Is Belief in the Resurrection Justified?
Risen Jesus
April 30, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Lawrence Shapiro debate the justifiability of believing Jesus was raised from the dead. Dr. Shapiro appeals t
Why Does It Seem Like God Hates Some and Favors Others?
Why Does It Seem Like God Hates Some and Favors Others?
#STRask
April 28, 2025
Questions about whether the fact that some people go through intense difficulties and suffering indicates that God hates some and favors others, and w
Bible Study: Choices and Character in James, Part 2
Bible Study: Choices and Character in James, Part 2
Knight & Rose Show
July 12, 2025
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose study James chapters 3-5, emphasizing taming the tongue and pursuing godly wisdom. They discuss humility, patience, and
What Should I Teach My Students About Worldviews?
What Should I Teach My Students About Worldviews?
#STRask
June 2, 2025
Question about how to go about teaching students about worldviews, what a worldview is, how to identify one, how to show that the Christian worldview