OpenTheo

August 8th: 1 Samuel 27 & Romans 8:18-39

Alastair Roberts
00:00
00:00

August 8th: 1 Samuel 27 & Romans 8:18-39

August 8, 2020
Alastair Roberts
Alastair Roberts

David goes into exile with the Philistines. All things work together for good.

Reflections upon the readings from the ACNA Book of Common Prayer (http://bcp2019.anglicanchurch.net/).

If you have enjoyed my output, please tell your friends. If you are interested in supporting my videos and podcasts and my research more generally, please consider supporting my work on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/zugzwanged), using my PayPal account (https://bit.ly/2RLaUcB), or by buying books for my research on Amazon (https://www.amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/ls/36WVSWCK4X33O?ref_=wl_share).

The audio of all of my videos is available on my Soundcloud account: https://soundcloud.com/alastairadversaria. You can also listen to the audio of these episodes on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/alastairs-adversaria/id1416351035?mt=2.

Share

Transcript

1 Samuel 27 Then David said in his heart, Now I shall perish one day by the hand of Saul. There is nothing better for me than that I should escape to the land of the Philistines. Then Saul will despair of seeking me any longer within the borders of Israel, and I shall escape out of his hand.
So David arose and went over, he and the six
hundred men who were with him, to Achish the son of Maok, king of Gath. And David lived with Achish at Gath, he and his men, every man with his household, and David with his two wives, Ahinoam of Jezreel and Abigail of Carmel, Naples' widow. And when it was told Saul that David had fled to Gath, he no longer sought him.
Then David said to Achish, If I have found favour in your eyes, let a place be given me in one of the country towns, that I may dwell there. For why should your servant dwell in the royal city with you? So that day Achish gave him Ziklag. Therefore Ziklag has belonged to the kings of Judah to this day.
And the number of the days that
David lived in the country of the Philistines was a year and four months. Now David and his men went up and made raids against the Geshurites, the Gerzites, and the Amalekites, for these were the inhabitants of the land from of old, as far as Shur to the land of Egypt. And David would strike the land, and would leave neither man nor woman alive, but would take away the sheep, the oxen, the donkeys, the camels, and the garments, and come back to Achish.
When Achish asked, Where have you made a raid today? David would say, Against
the Negeb of Judah, or against the Negeb of the Jeremelites, or against the Negeb of the Kenites. And David would leave neither man nor woman alive to bring news to Gath, thinking, lest they should tell about us, and say, So David has done. Such was his custom all the while he lived in the country of the Philistines.
And Achish trusted David, thinking, He has
made himself an utter stench to his people Israel. Therefore he shall always be my servant. In 1 Samuel chapter 27 David, despairing of the situation with Saul, goes into exile in Philistia.
David will have to wait in Philistia until Saul has been removed from the throne.
This descent into Philistia is similar to the descent into Egypt, and a connection between the Philistines and Egypt is found way back in chapter 10 of Genesis. In chapters 5 and 6 of this book, the Philistines brought the ark into Philistia, and suffered many plagues as a result before they returned the ark to the land with many gifts.
The parallels with the story of the
Exodus were not hard to see there. Here once again we have a story with many elements of the Exodus narrative pattern. As David goes to Philistia, he is given a part of the land of Philistia to live in, Ziklag, just as Israel was given Goshen in the time of Joseph.
There is later
an attack upon the bride, just as there is a threat to Sarah in chapters 12 and 20 of Genesis, and then Rebekah in chapter 26. As in other stories of Exodus, deception is an important and prominent theme. David deceives Achish, the king of Gath.
Achish is led to believe that David
is attacking his own land, and utterly cutting himself off from his people as a result. However, throughout, David is deceiving Achish, just as he deceived him earlier when he pretended to be mad before him. The Philistines will end up sending David away from their land, and as he leaves, he has to fight against the Amalekites.
This is yet another detail that reminds us of the original
Exodus narrative, as Israel has to fight the Amalekites in chapter 17 of Exodus. What might the significance of an Exodus pattern be here? Perhaps we should see David as playing out the destiny and the identity of the people in himself. Another possibility is that David is being set up as a comparison to a character like Moses.
David begins this chapter by giving up trying to
find peace in the land while Saul is there. As long as he remains in the land, Saul will try and kill him, and so he decides he must leave the land with his men, and he leads 600 men with him to Achish, king of Gath. 600 men was a very sizeable fighting force.
Saul was accompanied
by 600 men at various points in the preceding chapters. As it isn't just the 600 men who go with David, but their families, their wives, and their children, it would not be surprising if he had over a few thousand with him. This would be quite a significant group of people leaving the land.
Achish presumes that David is a rebel warlord at war with his master king Saul, and he
gives him the land of Ziklag. This freed David from being directly under Achish's gaze. In 2 Samuel chapter 15 verse 18, we discover that 600 Gittites followed David from Gath.
During this time then,
it seems that David was significantly increasing his forces, gathering a large number of Gentiles around him in addition to the Israelites who were following him at this point. While among the Philistines, David took his opportunity to attack various groups of peoples within the territory that had been allotted to Israel, but which had not yet been conquered by it. However, concerned that word might not get out to Achish, the king of Gath, David made sure that there was no one left to tell tales against him.
While he's attacking the Negev of various parts, he is secretly fighting
for Israel. The theme of deception that has been prominent throughout the book of 1 Samuel continues to be a very important element of this chapter. David's cunning resourcefulness allows him to live in perhaps one of the most dangerous places of all.
He's living in the city of the
great Philistine champion that he once killed himself, Goliath of Gath. A question to consider, what are some of the similarities that we can see with this story and David's situation in the land of the Philistines, and the stories of Abraham and Sarah and Isaac and Rebekah in chapters 12, 20 and 26 of the book of Genesis. Romans chapter 8 verses 18 to 39.
For I consider that the sufferings of this present time are not worth comparing with the glory that is to be revealed to us. For the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the sons of God. For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of him who subjected it in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to corruption and obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God.
For we know that the whole
creation has been groaning together in the pains of childbirth until now. And not only the creation, but we ourselves who have the first fruits of the spirit groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies. For in this hope we were saved.
Now hope that is
seen is not hope, for who hopes for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience. Likewise, the spirit helps us in our weakness, for we do not know what to pray for as we ought, but the spirit himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words. And he who searches hearts knows what is the mind of the spirit, because the spirit intercedes for the saints according to the will of God.
And we know that for those who love God, all things
work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.
What then shall we say to these things?
If God is for us, who can be against us? He who did not spare his own son, but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things? Who shall bring any charge against God's elect? It is God who justifies. Who is to condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died, more than that, who was raised, who is at the right hand of God, who indeed is interceding for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or danger, or sword? As it is written, for your sake we are being killed all the day long, we are regarded as sheep to be slaughtered.
No, in all these things we are more
than conquerors through him who loved us. For I am sure that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor rulers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. In addressing the question of suffering, among other things in the second half of Romans chapter 8, Paul is returning to some matters that he raised earlier in the letter, in places such as chapter 5 verses 3 to 5. Not only that, but we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope, and hope does not put us to shame, because God's love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.
Present sufferings are put into perspective by the hope that we await, much the
same point that Paul has made in 2 Corinthians chapter 4 verse 17. For this light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison. The incomparable glory that awaits us makes all of our present struggles and suffering seem small and of little account by comparison.
Indeed, for Paul, the glory that awaits us is not merely awaiting us,
but is awaiting the entire creation. The creation cannot be set to rights until mankind has been restored. The creation eagerly awaits the revelation of the sons of God, because their revelation is a sign of its longed-for deliverance from the futility to which it was subjected.
Until that time, the
creation itself exists in a state of bondage, much as the Gentiles had to wait until the Messiah dealt with Israel's problem before they could be brought in to enjoy freedom as one people with the Jews. So the creation has to wait for the revelation of the family of God. Mankind was created to steward the creation, to be fruitful and multiply, fill the earth, subdue it, and exercise dominion over its creatures.
This is the purpose for which Adam was created. He was created because the earth
needed someone to till it. Until mankind is set right, however, the problems of creation cannot be properly addressed.
The creation is stuck, its intended transformation arrested. At the fall,
on account of sin, creation was subjected to futility. The creation was subjected to the frustrating power of death, corruption, and decay in ways that rendered it futile and unable to reach its intended goal.
Genesis 3, verses 17-19, the judgment upon Adam, describes this.
And to Adam he said, Because you have listened to the voice of your wife, and have eaten of the tree of which I commanded you, you shall not eat of it. Cursed is the ground because of you.
In pain
you shall eat of it all the days of your life. Thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you, and you shall eat the plants of the field. By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread, till you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken, for you are dust, and to dust you shall return.
Why was the creation subjected to futility?
Perhaps to limit the spread and power of sin. If a sinful and fallen humanity had access to the full power of creation, a creation that wasn't subjected to futility, humanity could have done immense damage, far more than it has been able to do in a creation subjected to death. It was for this reason, for instance, that man was cut off from the tree of life.
If man lived
forever, then his sin would have much greater and far less mitigated effects. The sinner is ultimately the one subjected to the futility in the creation. The description of Ecclesiastes is a good example of this.
Life under the sun is described as vaporous. Vapor is something that you
can't easily see through, it masks and obscures things. It's not something that you can grasp hold of, you can't master it and control it and move it where you want it to go.
It's something
that leaves no mark behind, it vanishes. It is something that lacks solidity. In all of these respects, our lives have a vaporous character to them.
In Christ, however, we see power over the
creation, especially Christ's power to overcome the futility of the creation and the power of death at work within it. The wind and the waves obey him, he can raise the dead, he can restore that which is lacking and repair that which is broken. Subjecting the creation to futility was always only temporary.
The intention was always that it would, at the appropriate time, be released
from that futility, when its stewards were restored. The salvation of humanity then occurs against a cosmic backdrop. We were created in large measure as servants within the creation.
Salvation should
never be narrowly focused merely upon individuals, nor yet merely upon humans. We were saved for the sake of a greater purpose, so that we might be righteous and effective stewards of God within his world once more. The creation is described as groaning in labour.
The theme of labour pangs
are commonly used in scripture to speak of the pain through which a new order is brought to birth, most notably in John chapter 16 verse 21, where Jesus describes the woman whose hour has come, and the pains that come upon her as she's trying to bring a new child into the world, but then the joy that follows. We should remember that the earth is like a womb. We have that expressed in the poetry of scripture.
Naked I came from my mother's womb, naked I will return there,
knit together in the lowest parts of the earth. The earth is our mother, the Adama from which the Adam is formed. For most of history, however, the womb of the earth has been a barren one.
Christ opens the womb of the earth, the womb of the tomb in his resurrection. He is the first born from the dead, and as a result we have the first fruits of the new creation, a creation that is no longer trapped in futility and death, with man returning to the dust, man returning to the tomb, the mother from which he first came. As the people of God, the sons of God, we share in the cosmic groaning of the creation, on account of the fact that we have possession of the first fruits of the spirit.
The spirit is the one by whom we are begotten again, but the new birth that the spirit
brings about still isn't complete until our bodies are raised. The spirit's work has begun, but we now join with the creation in longing for the deliverance that is yet to come. We have the first fruits, which serve to guarantee that we will one day enjoy the life of the spirit in its fullness, but we still wait for that day.
Many theologians have used the expression
already not yet to express the tension in which Christians must live. The spirit that we have received is already an anticipation of a future that has very much not yet arrived. The already not yet dynamic can affect some of the way that basic dimensions of salvation play out.
For instance, justification is already received, on the basis of Christ's death and resurrection in the past. However, we await a justification in the future, as we will be vindicated by God on the last day when we are judged according to our works. The same is true of adoption.
We have already been adopted, in some senses. We are already children of God. Yet in another respect, as we see in this chapter, we still await our adoption, which comes when our bodies are raised.
Our salvation, while definitively one in Christ, has not yet been realised in practice.
Our salvation is largely an awaited salvation, albeit one that God has assured us of. Our salvation is in large measure something apprehended by hope.
It can't be seen, as it
isn't yet here. However, it can be grasped by the confidence of Christian hope. If we have such a hope within us, we will wait patiently, aware of the glorious character of that which we are awaiting.
The spirit is present with us in our struggles as we patiently await. The spirit intercedes for us, and also equips us in the manner and the material of prayer, teaching us how to pray. As the spirit inspires our prayers, his groanings and longings become ours.
Paul has earlier spoken of the way
that the spirit grants us a sense of intimacy with God in prayer, as by the spirit of adoption we address God as Abba. Now he wants us to see that the spirit empowers our prayers in other ways, in ways that snatch us up into the great cosmic drama. God is at work within us, renewing us, so that we might become not just sites of his restoration work, but fellow workers with God in that task.
Verse 28 is one of those verses that is
routinely abstracted from its context, and treated as a sort of general promise text. God works all things together for good to those who love him, the people he has called for his purposes. Those who love God, and those who are called according to his purpose, are synonymous.
God in calling us poured out his love in our hearts by his spirit. The people in question are the body of people that God has called. In God's call he secures the appropriate response.
God's grace is the basis of our spiritual, no less than our natural life. This is the body of people that God is forming in the fullness of time, the sons of God that Paul spoke of earlier. It's a very specific group of people of which Paul is speaking here.
Paul is also speaking of
things working together for good in the context of the suffering, weakness and groaning that he has been discussing to this point. The things that are working together for good are the sufferings and the trials in our lives. The meaning of working together for good should also be carefully considered.
This is not just a matter of things generally panning out fairly well for people who
believe in a heavenly father. No, good is a far weightier word in this context, as we will see in the verses that follow. The deeper cause of our assurance here is the expression according to his purpose.
God has an intention in calling us and he will achieve that whatever might befall us.
In verses 29 and 30 Paul traces things back to this deep purpose of God. Once we realise that everything is grounded in the purpose and the promises of God, we will have much more assurance.
It all begins not with us but with God's foreknowledge. God's foreknowledge is his eternal loving will for our existence as a people for himself. To God's foreknowledge is added his predestination, his determination in advance that we will be conformed to the image of his son, so that a Christ-shaped people might be formed.
This is the great governing design in all of this.
Some, by treating Christ more as if he were the means of executing God's electional predestination of a certain set of individuals, rather than at the very heart of it all, the one that it's all about, have rather distorted our sense of what Paul is referring to here. At the centre of God's purpose of foreknowledge and election is not a random set of individuals called the elect, rather it is Christ himself.
He is the one that exists at the heart of God's purpose in history
and we are formed around him and conformed to him. Having ordained that this people be formed, when the time came he called them into new life by the powerful word of his spirit, which awakens the spiritually dead and brings into existence people who were no people. Calling these people God declares them to be, even though ungodly, people in good standing with himself, he justifies them.
Once again this isn't a timeless truth about salvation, so much as it is a claim about what God is doing in this new work in Christ in the fullness of time and the confidence the Roman Christians could find in this fact. This work of God in salvation was something hidden from the foundation of the world, but in this moment in history, as a result of Christ's work, it is being revealed and worked out. Not only has God declared the called people to be in good standing with himself in justification, he has also glorified them.
We are now, as Paul says in Ephesians 2.6,
raised up with him and seated with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus. This glorification, like the adoption that he spoke of earlier, or our justification, which anticipates final justification, is anticipatory. We still wait to be clothed with the glory of the resurrected body.
However, even now we already have the first fruits and the guarantee of that
future glorification in the gift of the Holy Spirit. This isn't just an irresistible divine purpose though. When everything is seen, it is not an austere divine plan with which we are dealing, but an unfailing and enduring and persistent divine love, a love that will never surrender us to another, no matter the force that tries to obstruct it.
Paul asks a series of rhetorical
questions before launching into a triumphant proclamation at the end of the chapter. The first question is, if God is for us, who can be against us? The fact that God gave us his son assures us of everything else. God has done the really great thing.
Then why be anxious about all
that is small by comparison? This is the point that he made in Romans 5, verses 8-10. But God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since therefore we have now been justified by his blood, much more shall we be saved by him from the wrath of God.
For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of his son, much more, now that we are reconciled, shall we be saved by his life. The second question he asks, who shall bring any charge against God's elect? This is an imagined law court. Who is going to come forward and bring some charge against this person? If anyone were to bring a charge, they would be found to be at odds with God himself.
He has declared us to be
in good standing with himself. God has justified. Who can stand as an accuser now? The third question is similar.
Who is to condemn? Christ himself has died for our sins. He was raised
for our justification. He is now interceding on our behalf in heaven.
The surety of Christ's
definitive and continuing work leaves no ground for condemnation. The fourth question, who shall separate us from the love of Christ? As if trying to figure out the answer, Paul goes on to give a roll call of the forces, the powers and the extremities of creation, not one of which would be able to cut us off from God's love. God's love in Christ descended from the highest heights to the deepest of all depths.
There is nowhere where people are beyond the reach of God's grace and
love. When grasped by God's love, there is no greater power that might wrest us out of his hands. Most particularly, all of the sufferings, trials, dangers and difficulties that come our way cannot separate us from God.
Quite the opposite. In our sufferings, we are marked out for loving sacrifice
to God. We are also being conformed to his dearly loved son, who was led as a lamb to the slaughter.
In the light of all of this, we can persevere in tribulations, in hope and in confidence. A question to consider, how has Paul developed the theme of the love of God in the epistle of Romans to this point?

More on OpenTheo

Do People with Dementia Have Free Will?
Do People with Dementia Have Free Will?
#STRask
June 16, 2025
Question about whether or not people with dementia have free will and are morally responsible for the sins they commit.   * Do people with dementia h
Can Secular Books Assist Our Christian Walk?
Can Secular Books Assist Our Christian Walk?
#STRask
April 17, 2025
Questions about how secular books assist our Christian walk and how Greg studies the Bible.   * How do secular books like Atomic Habits assist our Ch
What Should I Say to Someone Who Believes Zodiac Signs Determine Personality?
What Should I Say to Someone Who Believes Zodiac Signs Determine Personality?
#STRask
June 5, 2025
Questions about how to respond to a family member who believes Zodiac signs determine personality and what to say to a co-worker who believes aliens c
How Is Prophecy About the Messiah Recognized?
How Is Prophecy About the Messiah Recognized?
#STRask
May 19, 2025
Questions about how to recognize prophecies about the Messiah in the Old Testament and whether or not Paul is just making Scripture say what he wants
Can a Deceased Person’s Soul Live On in the Recipient of His Heart?
Can a Deceased Person’s Soul Live On in the Recipient of His Heart?
#STRask
May 12, 2025
Questions about whether a deceased person’s soul can live on in the recipient of his heart, whether 1 Corinthians 15:44 confirms that babies in the wo
Should We Not Say Anything Against Voodoo?
Should We Not Say Anything Against Voodoo?
#STRask
March 27, 2025
Questions about how to respond to someone who thinks we shouldn’t say anything against Voodoo since it’s “just their culture” and arguments to refute
Did Jesus Rise from the Dead? Dr. Michael Licona and Dr. Abel Pienaar Debate
Did Jesus Rise from the Dead? Dr. Michael Licona and Dr. Abel Pienaar Debate
Risen Jesus
April 2, 2025
Is it reasonable to believe that Jesus rose from the dead? Dr. Michael Licona claims that if Jesus didn’t, he is a false prophet, and no rational pers
Why Do Some Churches Say You Need to Keep the Mosaic Law?
Why Do Some Churches Say You Need to Keep the Mosaic Law?
#STRask
May 5, 2025
Questions about why some churches say you need to keep the Mosaic Law and the gospel of Christ to be saved, and whether or not it’s inappropriate for
The Resurrection - Argument from Personal Incredulity or Methodological Naturalism - Licona vs. Dillahunty - Part 2
The Resurrection - Argument from Personal Incredulity or Methodological Naturalism - Licona vs. Dillahunty - Part 2
Risen Jesus
March 26, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Licona provides a positive case for the resurrection of Jesus at the 2017 [UN]Apologetic Conference in Austin, Texas. He bases hi
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Two: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Two: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
Risen Jesus
June 4, 2025
The following episode is part two of the debate between atheist philosopher Dr. Evan Fales and Dr. Mike Licona in 2014 at the University of St. Thoman
The Biblical View of Abortion with Tom Pennington
The Biblical View of Abortion with Tom Pennington
Life and Books and Everything
May 5, 2025
What does the Bible say about life in the womb? When does life begin? What about personhood? What has the church taught about abortion over the centur
What Discernment Skills Should We Develop to Make Sure We’re Getting Wise Answers from AI?
What Discernment Skills Should We Develop to Make Sure We’re Getting Wise Answers from AI?
#STRask
April 3, 2025
Questions about what discernment skills we should develop to make sure we’re getting wise answers from AI, and how to overcome confirmation bias when
The Resurrection - Argument from Personal Incredulity or Methodological Naturalism - Licona vs. Dillahunty - Part 1
The Resurrection - Argument from Personal Incredulity or Methodological Naturalism - Licona vs. Dillahunty - Part 1
Risen Jesus
March 19, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Licona provides a positive case for the resurrection of Jesus at the 2017 [UN]Apologetic Conference in Austin, Texas. He bases hi
Licona vs. Shapiro: Is Belief in the Resurrection Justified?
Licona vs. Shapiro: Is Belief in the Resurrection Justified?
Risen Jesus
April 30, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Lawrence Shapiro debate the justifiability of believing Jesus was raised from the dead. Dr. Shapiro appeals t
Can You Really Say Evil Is Just a Privation of Good?
Can You Really Say Evil Is Just a Privation of Good?
#STRask
April 21, 2025
Questions about whether one can legitimately say evil is a privation of good, how the Bible can say sin and death entered the world at the fall if ang