OpenTheo

July 24th: 1 Samuel 14 & 2 Corinthians 7

Alastair Roberts
00:00
00:00

July 24th: 1 Samuel 14 & 2 Corinthians 7

July 23, 2020
Alastair Roberts
Alastair Roberts

Jonathan's heroics. Paul's delight in the Corinthians.

Reflections upon the readings from the ACNA Book of Common Prayer (http://bcp2019.anglicanchurch.net/).

If you have enjoyed my output, please tell your friends. If you are interested in supporting my videos and podcasts and my research more generally, please consider supporting my work on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/zugzwanged), using my PayPal account (https://bit.ly/2RLaUcB), or by buying books for my research on Amazon (https://www.amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/ls/36WVSWCK4X33O?ref_=wl_share).

The audio of all of my videos is available on my Soundcloud account: https://soundcloud.com/alastairadversaria. You can also listen to the audio of these episodes on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/alastairs-adversaria/id1416351035?mt=2.

Share

Transcript

1 Samuel chapter 14. One day Jonathan the son of Saul said to the young man who carried his armor, Come, let us go over to the Philistine garrison on the other side. But he did not tell his father.
Saul was staying in the outskirts of Gibeah in the pomegranate cave, at Migron.
The people who were with him were about six hundred men, including Ahijah the son of Ahitab, Ichabod's brother, son of Phinehas, son of Eli, the priest of the Lord in Shiloh, wearing an ephod. And the people did not know that Jonathan had gone.
Within the passes by which
Jonathan sought to go over to the Philistine garrison, there was a rocky crag on the one side and a rocky crag on the other side. The name of the one was Boaz, and the name of the other, Sina. The one crag rose on the north in front of Micmash, and the other on the south in front of Gibeah.
Jonathan said to the young man who carried his armor, Come,
let us go over to the garrison of these uncircumcised. It may be that the Lord will work for us, for nothing can hinder the Lord from saving by many or by few. And his armor-bearer said to him, Do all that is in your heart.
Do as you wish. Behold, I am with you heart and
soul. Then Jonathan said, Behold, we will cross over to the men, and we will show ourselves to them.
If they say to us, Wait until we come to you, then we will stand still in our
place, and we will not go up to them. But if they say, Come up to us, then we will go up, for the Lord has given them into our hand, and this shall be the sign to us. So both of them showed themselves to the garrison of the Philistines, and the Philistines said, Look, Hebrews are coming out of the holes where they have hidden themselves.
And the
men of the garrison hailed Jonathan and his armor-bearer and said, Come up to us, and we will show you a thing. And Jonathan said to his armor-bearer, Come up after me, for the Lord has given them into the hand of Israel. Then Jonathan climbed up on his hands and feet, and his armor-bearer after him.
And they fell before Jonathan, and his armor-bearer
killed them after him. And that first strike which Jonathan and his armor-bearer made killed about twenty men within, as it were, half a furrow's length in an acre of land. And there was a panic in the camp, in the field, and among all the people, the garrison and even the raiders trembled, the earth quaked, and it became a very great panic.
And the
watchmen of Saul and Gibeah of Benjamin looked, and behold the multitude was dispersing here and there. Then Saul said to the people who were with him, Count and see who has gone from us. And when they had counted, behold, Jonathan and his armor-bearer were not there.
So Saul said to Ahijah, Bring the ark of God here. For the ark of God went at that time with the people of Israel. Now while Saul was talking to the priest, the tumult in the camp of the Philistines increased more and more.
So Saul said to the priest, Withdraw
your hand. Then Saul and all the people who were with him rallied and went into the battle. And behold every Philistine's sword was against his fellow, and there was very great confusion.
Now the Hebrews who had been with the Philistines before that time, and who had gone up with them into the camp, even they also turned to be with the Israelites who were with Saul and Jonathan. Likewise, when all the men of Israel who had hidden themselves in the hill country of Ephraim heard that the Philistines were fleeing, they too followed hard after them in the battle. So the Lord saved Israel that day, and the battle passed beyond Beth-Avon.
And the men of Israel had been hard-pressed that day. So Saul had laid an oath on the people, saying, Cursed be the man who eats food until it is evening, and I am avenged on my enemies. So none of the people had tasted food.
Now when all the people came to the
forest, behold there was honey on the ground. And when the people entered the forest, behold the honey was dropping. But no one put his hand to his mouth, for the people feared the oath.
But Jonathan had not heard his father charge the people with the oath. So he put
out the tip of the starth that was in his hand, and dipped it in the honeycomb, and put his hand to his mouth, and his eyes became bright. Then one of the people said, Your father strictly charged the people with an oath, saying, Cursed be the man who eats food this day.
And the people were faint. Then Jonathan said, My father has troubled the land. See
how my eyes have become bright because I tasted a little of this honey.
How much better if
the people had eaten freely today of the spoil of their enemies that they found. For now the defeat among the Philistines has not been great. They struck down the Philistines that day from Michmash to Ajalon.
And the people were very faint. The people pounced
on the spoil and took sheep and oxen and calves, and slaughtered them on the ground. And the people ate them with the blood.
Then they told Saul, Behold the people are sinning against
the Lord by eating with the blood. And he said, You have dealt treacherously. Roll the great stone to me here.
And Saul said, Disperse yourselves among the people and say to them,
Let every man bring his ox or his sheep and slaughter them here and eat. And do not sin against the Lord by eating with the blood. So every one of the people brought his ox with him that night, and they slaughtered them there.
And Saul built an altar to the
Lord. It was the first altar that he built to the Lord. Then Saul said, Let us go down after the Philistines by night and plunder them until the morning light.
Let us not leave
a man of them. And they said, Do whatever seems good to you. But the priest said, Let us draw near to God here.
And Saul inquired of God, Shall I go down after the Philistines?
Will you give them into the hand of Israel? But he did not answer him that day. And Saul said, Come here, all you leaders of the people, and know and see how this sin has arisen today. For as the Lord lives who saves Israel, though it be in Jonathan my son, he shall surely die.
But there was not a man among all the people who answered him. Then he said to all
Israel, You shall be on one side, and I and Jonathan my son will be on the other side. And the people said to Saul, Do what seems good to you.
Therefore Saul said, O Lord God
of Israel, why have you not answered your servant this day? If this guilt is in me or in Jonathan my son, O Lord God of Israel, give o'er him. But if this guilt is in your people Israel, give them him. And Jonathan and Saul were taken, but the people escaped.
Then Saul said, Cast the lot between me and my son Jonathan. And Jonathan was taken. Then Saul said to Jonathan, Tell me what you have done.
And Jonathan told him, I tasted
a little honey with the tip of the staff that was in my hand. Here I am, I will die. And Saul said, God do so to me and more also, you shall surely die, Jonathan.
Then the people
said to Saul, Shall Jonathan die, who has worked this great salvation in Israel? Far from it. As the Lord lives, there shall not one hair of his head fall to the ground, for he has worked with God this day. So the people ransomed Jonathan, so that he did not die.
Then Saul went up from pursuing the Philistines, and the Philistines went to their own place. When Saul had taken the kingship over Israel, he fought against all his enemies on every side, against Moab, against the Ammonites, against Edom, against the kings of Zobah, and against the Philistines. Wherever he turned, he routed them.
And he did valiantly, and
struck the Amalekites and delivered Israel out of the hands of those who plundered them. Now the sons of Saul were Jonathan, Ishvi, and Mal-Keshua. And the names of his two daughters were these.
The name of the firstborn was Merab, and the name of the younger, Michael.
And the name of Saul's wife was Ahinoam, the daughter of Vehemaz. And the name of the commander of his army was Abner the son of Ner, Saul's uncle.
Kish was the father of Saul, and Ner
the father of Abner was the son of Abiel. There was hard fighting against the Philistines all the days of Saul, and when Saul saw any strong man or any valiant man, he attached him to himself. At the beginning of 1 Samuel chapter 14, Saul and his men are in a difficult position.
Most of Saul's forces have left him, many
of them dispersed as Saul waited for Samuel to appear, and as they saw the size of the Philistine counter-offensive. We might have expected a battle at the end of the previous chapter, but the Philistine raiding parties had gone out without being stopped. At the end of chapter 13 we learn that the Israelites were largely without weaponry, with only Saul and Jonathan having swords in their possession.
Saul has been denied a dynasty on account of
his sin. There was no reason why Saul could not have been a great king. However, he failed badly.
He allowed unaddressed weaknesses in his character to develop into flaws, which
in their turn developed into destructive vices. In this chapter, Jonathan, Saul's son, will come to the foreground. After Saul's failure, Jonathan plays the part of the saviour that Israel so desperately needs.
Jonathan took the initiative in attacking the Philistine
garrison at Geba in the previous chapter, and here he takes the initiative again. Jonathan's character prepares us for David, who is to come. Jonathan shares several characteristics in common with David.
Jonathan also contrasts with his father, offering a glimpse of what
a faithful Saul could have achieved. In between two accounts of his father's sinful failing, Jonathan's courageous faith stands out like a beacon. The author of Samuel is a very gifted narrator and he tells his story with care.
For instance,
we should notice the way that he subtly foregrounds the father-son relationship between Saul and Jonathan from the very outset of this chapter. The father and the son will be juxtaposed throughout the story. To understand the events of this chapter, it helps to have a sense of the topography.
Geba and Mikmash are Benjaminite cities within a mile or so of each other, yet
they are separated by a deep wadi canyon, with steep cliffs on either side. The Philistines are encamped at Mikmash in the north, and the Israelites are at Geba in the south. There is a strategically important pass between the two sides.
The Philistines and the Israelites
can both see each other from where they are situated, but the enemy camp is not easily accessible. Saul has lost most of the 2,000 men that he had at the beginning of chapter 13, along with the extra troops that he mustered at Gilgal. Now he only has 600 people with him.
Saul's beleaguered forces are accompanied by a priest, Ahijah the son of Ahitab, Ichabod's
brother, and the son of Phinehas, son of Eli. Perhaps this association between Saul and a descendant of Phinehas should be seen as ominous. Jonathan proposes a daring escapade to his armour-bearer.
In 1 Samuel, the position of
armour-bearer seems to have a certain amount of honour attached with it, and isn't merely a menial role. David will later be favoured with the position of armour-bearer for Saul. If we really must, we might not be that far off the mark in thinking about the role as that of a professional weapons caddy.
Jonathan's plan is to go over to the Philistine side of the Wadi Canyon. It seems that rather than taking the pass where the Philistines would have expected an offensive, Jonathan plans to descend into the ravine itself and then ascend up the other side. This was a daring and a dangerous plan, but Jonathan proposes it, expressing his confidence in the Lord's power.
The Lord is capable of saving, whether by many or by few. Jonathan
has learnt the lesson from Gideon, and we'll see echoes of Gideon in this story. In taking the path that he does, presumably Jonathan is hoping to meet with just an outpost of the garrison, rather than with the main body of the Philistine forces.
Like Gideon, Jonathan proposes a sign. If the Philistines invite them up, they will go up to them, confident the Lord has delivered them into their hands. However, if the Philistines say that they will come down, no positive sign has been given.
The Philistines however
respond by inviting them to come up, not taking seriously the threat posed by just a couple of men. Jonathan and his armour bearer have to climb up, but when they do, they kill about twenty men of the Philistines. This produces a panic in the Philistine camp, reminiscent of what happened at the attack of Gideon upon the Midianites.
This is accompanied by a sign
from the Lord, as the earth quakes. The Philistine army is thrown into disarray and are very fearful. Meanwhile, Saul and his men are looking out from the other side of the ravine, and they see the commotion within the Philistine camp.
Presuming that some of their number
have been involved, they muster the men, and it turns out that Jonathan and his armour bearer were not present. Saul then instructs Ahijah the priest to bring the Ark of God to him. The Ark of God mentioned here is referred to as the Ifad in the Septuagint.
It is likely
that it was the Ifad that was mentioned here, and that the Ark is still at Kiriath-jerim. It would make far more sense for Ahijah to consult the Ifad than it would for him to consult the Ark, although there were parallels between the Ifad and the Ark, which may be why it is referred to as the Ark here. However, as the commotion increases within the Philistine camp, Saul instructs Ahijah not to go ahead with consulting the Ifad, presumably the Eurydice and Thummim.
Saul then gathers his men and goes into battle, but the victory is clearly
the Lord's. Israel lacks swords and other weaponry, but the Lord sets the swords of the Philistines against each other. Israelites who had been holed up and hiding come out and start to join the fight, and Hebrews who had joined the Philistines as mercenaries start to turn against their masters.
However, in the battle Saul makes a rash oath. He cursed
the man who would eat food until it was evening, and he was avenged on his enemies. His failure to consult the Lord, his rash vow, and the fact that he speaks of his enemies rather than the Lord's enemies all give an unflattering portrayal of Saul, especially compared to his son Jonathan.
Not knowing about his father's vow, Jonathan takes some honey which is dripping
on the ground of the forest. Israel is a land flowing with milk and honey, and this is a very visible portrayal of the Lord's blessing of it. Jonathan's eyes are enlightened as a result.
He is invigorated. However, the rest of Saul's army are faint with hunger
as a result of their exertion. When Jonathan is informed of his father's vow, he accuses his father of troubling the land.
He has been revived and his strength renewed by this honey,
and if the rest of the people had been able to enjoy it, theirs could have been too. But as a result of Saul's vow, they will not be able to carry through the battle to a satisfactory conclusion. They will be limited in what they can achieve.
They strike down the Philistines
from Michmash to Ejilon, and the people are very faint at this point. Ejilon will remind us of the lengthened day under Joshua, but now it becomes a place where the day of battle has to be cut short because of the weakness of the people. And what's worse, when the people do get food, they eat it immediately without preparing it in the way prescribed by the law.
They fail to drain it of the blood. Saul builds an altar so that they can properly
ritually slaughter the animals. However, the damage has been done, and the Lord does not give him an answer when he asks to go down against the Philistines.
Saul's rash vow has also created a breach between him and the people, and when he calls for the Urim and Thummim, he is confident that it will be the people who are found to be at fault. However, it is his own son Jonathan. The casting of lots here might recall the sin of Achan.
Whereas the people were judged on that occasion as a result of the sin of
a person touching the forbidden things, things forbidden by the Lord himself, here the problem is caused by Saul's own rash vow. When Jonathan is identified as the culprit, we might be reminded of the story of Jephthah and his vow. He lost his dynasty as a result of his vow, and Saul has taken a vow of his own accord which has now brought him to the point of being prepared to put his own son to death.
This is a rather ironic fulfilment of the
judgement of Samuel in the preceding chapter. Saul is prepared to kill his son Jonathan, but the people intervene and ransom Jonathan, whether it's with an animal or money, or simply by virtue of their insistence that he should not be put to death. It's not entirely clear.
However, Saul does not come out of this instant looking good. He has ended up
pitting himself against the people, and then pitting himself against his son who is the hero of the hour, and as a result of his rash vow, the victory is not followed through. Saul leaves off pursuing the Philistines, and the Philistines go away.
As a result of
his failure, Saul lost the opportunity to deliver a crushing blow. The chapter concludes with a description of Saul's victories and battles, and then also his children. Saul was a successful military leader.
However, the description of the various enemies as his
enemies might recall the use of that pronoun in chapter 8. There it revealed the way that the king would be particularly governed by his own quest for glory, rather than serving the people. Three sons of Saul are mentioned here, other sons are mentioned elsewhere, perhaps sons of a different wife. Another possibility is that Ishvi is another name for Ishbasheth.
We will encounter his two daughters later on again in the story. A question
to consider, how many ways can you identify in this chapter that the narrator sets the character of Jonathan in direct contrast to that of Saul? 2 Corinthians chapter 7 From chapter 6 verse 14 to chapter 7 verse 1, Paul charges the Corinthians to separate themselves from unbelievers, behaving appropriately as the temple of the living God. The first verse of chapter 7 concludes this exhortation, but draws attention to the fact that our separation from wickedness is chiefly motivated by incredible promises that God has given to us.
He has promised us that he will live with us, walk
among us, that he will be our God, and that we will be his people, and that he will be our father and we his sons and daughters. In chapter 6 verses 11 to 13, Paul wrote, Now he returns to the same note of appeal. There should be no obstacle to the Corinthians opening their hearts up to Paul.
He hasn't wronged anyone, corrupted anyone, or taken
advantage of anyone. His point is not to condemn or shame them in his defence of himself. He reiterates his deep devotion to and affection for them.
His love for them will endure through
both life and death. Their destinies are intertwined. Paul is speaking far more directly here than he has done in the earlier chapters, in unburdening himself to the Corinthians.
Earlier, in chapter
2 verses 1 to 3, Paul had written, Paul's desire had been to be caused to rejoice by the Corinthians, and it appears that this had occurred. Although his relationship with them had been painful for a time, he now had been reassured by them and delights in them, finding them to be a source of joy in his affliction. His boldness in speech with them is occasioned by his confidence that they will receive it appropriately.
By openly expressing his pride and confidence in them, he presents
a further foundation for his forthrightness of speech with them. It is because of his high regard for them that he feels able to speak as directly as he does to them. Paul returns to matters he discussed earlier on in the letter.
In chapter 2 verses 12 to 13,
Paul had spoken of the distress that he had felt when Titus wasn't at Troas. Paul's anguish was most likely occasioned by the fact that Titus was the one who was to bring him word of the Corinthians. In Titus' absence, he was in painful suspense about how the Corinthians felt towards him and how they had received his painful correspondence.
However, when Titus
finally arrived, the news that he brought of the Corinthians was a cause of great comfort to Paul, as he communicated the feelings of the Corinthians to Paul. In the comfort brought by Titus, Paul sees the hand of God. At the beginning of the letter, he had spoken of the way that God brings comfort to his people.
In Titus' return, Paul experiences God's consolation.
At this point, we start to get a sense of the matter that had caused the pained relations between Paul and the Corinthians. The Corinthians had felt wounded by Paul's letter.
It seems most
likely that someone in Corinth had acted wrongly towards Paul, or perhaps to another member of the party, perhaps Timothy, causing him considerable pain and grief, especially when he feared that the other Corinthians would finally take the side of the one who had wronged him, as they had not properly rebuked the man. However, their subsequent response had made very clear that they were innocent in the matter, and from chapter 2 verses 5-8, it seems that the offender himself had also felt appropriate sorrow for his wrong. The effectiveness of their grief, that it was not merely sterile remorse, but sorrow that was fruitful in repentance, served to manifest the innocence of the Corinthians of the wrong, but also caused Paul joy, as it was evidence of a decisive shift in the relationship that the Corinthians had with him, and a warming of affections in a formerly strained relationship.
What Paul terms worldly grief doesn't actually produce change, it mostly just laments
unwanted outcomes. However, godly grief leads to godly transformation. For the Corinthians, it had borne fruit in a passionate expression of concern to communicate their innocence and their true affections towards Paul.
Paul's chief purpose in writing the letter had not been to vindicate or
avenge himself, nor had it been driven by a desire to punish or get the Corinthians to discipline the wrongdoer. Rather, his principal design had been to spur them to a renewed expression of their commitment to him and his companions. The bonds of fellowship are paramount in Paul's mind here.
Besides being comforted by the return and the news brought by Titus, Paul and his companions' joy was compounded by the joy of Titus himself, who had been blessed by the Corinthians. Paul's statements here should not blind us to the less encouraging news that Titus seems to have brought too, for instance about the Corinthians' feelings about Paul's council visit. However, right now the relief and encouragement are at the forefront of Paul's mind.
Paul appears to have expressed his confidence in the Corinthians
to Titus before sending him, enthusiastically praising them to him. For all of the Corinthians' faults, Paul was a proud spiritual father and couldn't help sharing his delight and confidence in his children in the faith. Titus himself had been encouraged by and his heart knit to the Corinthians.
Paul will soon be sending him back to them to arrange the collection, which he will
start to discuss in the following chapter. Paul concludes this chapter by declaring his confidence in the Corinthians again. His confidence, of course, is not just in the good character of the Corinthians themselves, but primarily in God's work that is going on among them.
A question to consider, what
lessons can we learn about the character of Christian ministry from Paul's relationship with the Corinthians?

More on OpenTheo

Can God Be Real and Personal to Me If the Sign Gifts of the Spirit Are Rare?
Can God Be Real and Personal to Me If the Sign Gifts of the Spirit Are Rare?
#STRask
April 10, 2025
Questions about disappointment that the sign gifts of the Spirit seem rare, non-existent, or fake, whether or not believers can squelch the Holy Spiri
God Didn’t Do Anything to Earn Being God, So How Did He Become So Judgmental?
God Didn’t Do Anything to Earn Being God, So How Did He Become So Judgmental?
#STRask
May 15, 2025
Questions about how God became so judgmental if he didn’t do anything to become God, and how we can think the flood really happened if no definition o
Did Jesus Rise from the Dead? Dr. Michael Licona and Dr. Abel Pienaar Debate
Did Jesus Rise from the Dead? Dr. Michael Licona and Dr. Abel Pienaar Debate
Risen Jesus
April 2, 2025
Is it reasonable to believe that Jesus rose from the dead? Dr. Michael Licona claims that if Jesus didn’t, he is a false prophet, and no rational pers
How Should I Respond to the Phrase “Just Follow the Science”?
How Should I Respond to the Phrase “Just Follow the Science”?
#STRask
March 31, 2025
Questions about how to respond when someone says, “Just follow the science,” and whether or not it’s a good tactic to cite evolutionists’ lack of a go
Licona and Martin Talk about the Physical Resurrection of Jesus
Licona and Martin Talk about the Physical Resurrection of Jesus
Risen Jesus
May 21, 2025
In today’s episode, we have a Religion Soup dialogue from Acadia Divinity College between Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Dale Martin on whether Jesus physica
Can Someone Impart Spiritual Gifts to Others?
Can Someone Impart Spiritual Gifts to Others?
#STRask
April 7, 2025
Questions about whether or not someone can impart the gifts of healing, prophecy, words of knowledge, etc. to others and whether being an apostle nece
Pastoral Theology with Jonathan Master
Pastoral Theology with Jonathan Master
Life and Books and Everything
April 21, 2025
First published in 1877, Thomas Murphy’s Pastoral Theology: The Pastor in the Various Duties of His Office is one of the absolute best books of its ki
The Plausibility of Jesus' Rising from the Dead Licona vs. Shapiro
The Plausibility of Jesus' Rising from the Dead Licona vs. Shapiro
Risen Jesus
April 23, 2025
In this episode of the Risen Jesus podcast, we join Dr. Licona at Ohio State University for his 2017 resurrection debate with philosopher Dr. Lawrence
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Risen Jesus
May 7, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Bart Ehrman face off for the second time on whether historians can prove the resurrection. Dr. Ehrman says no
Is It Okay to Ask God for the Repentance of Someone Who Has Passed Away?
Is It Okay to Ask God for the Repentance of Someone Who Has Passed Away?
#STRask
April 24, 2025
Questions about asking God for the repentance of someone who has passed away, how to respond to a request to pray for a deceased person, reconciling H
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Three: The Meaning of Miracle Stories
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Three: The Meaning of Miracle Stories
Risen Jesus
June 11, 2025
In this episode, we hear from Dr. Evan Fales as he presents his case against the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection and responds to Dr. Licona’s writi
Jay Richards: Economics, Gender Ideology and MAHA
Jay Richards: Economics, Gender Ideology and MAHA
Knight & Rose Show
April 19, 2025
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose welcome Heritage Foundation policy expert Dr. Jay Richards to discuss policy and culture. Jay explains how economic fre
What Questions Should I Ask Someone Who Believes in a Higher Power?
What Questions Should I Ask Someone Who Believes in a Higher Power?
#STRask
May 26, 2025
Questions about what to ask someone who believes merely in a “higher power,” how to make a case for the existence of the afterlife, and whether or not
The Resurrection - Argument from Personal Incredulity or Methodological Naturalism - Licona vs. Dillahunty - Part 1
The Resurrection - Argument from Personal Incredulity or Methodological Naturalism - Licona vs. Dillahunty - Part 1
Risen Jesus
March 19, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Licona provides a positive case for the resurrection of Jesus at the 2017 [UN]Apologetic Conference in Austin, Texas. He bases hi
Why Do Some Churches Say You Need to Keep the Mosaic Law?
Why Do Some Churches Say You Need to Keep the Mosaic Law?
#STRask
May 5, 2025
Questions about why some churches say you need to keep the Mosaic Law and the gospel of Christ to be saved, and whether or not it’s inappropriate for