OpenTheo
00:00
00:00

A Dust-up among the Historians

December 9, 2022
Life and Books and Everything
Life and Books and EverythingClearly Reformed

For as much as the CFH talks about inclusion and the free exchange of ideas, it is clear that the present leadership of the historical guild assumes conclusions on the left.

In this response to a recent article published by Jay Green, Kevin discusses the pitfalls of using history for activist purposes.

Share

Transcript

[MUSIC]
Greetings and salutations. Welcome to Life and Books and everything. I'm Kevin D. Young.
Today I'm reading my world opinions piece, and maybe I'll give a little bit of explanation along the way for some of the terms and issues here.
The piece is entitled "A Dust Up Among the Historians, the Problem of the Historian as Activist" approach to the past. To many outsiders, the field of history probably looks like a straightforward endeavor.
Historians teach us about the people, the events, and the ideas of the past.
Sounds simple, but once you start studying the past, you realize there is no one agreed upon way to do history. In the last several years, this perennial difficulty has become especially pronounced within the guild of Evangelical Historians.
Evangelicals broadly understood.
A recent online kerfuffle helps illuminate this intra-evangelical debate. At the end of November, Jay Green, a professor of history at Covenant College, published a piece on the new shape of Christian public discourse.
That's the title of the article. If you read this online, you can link to this in various other articles that I reference throughout the piece. In this article, he tries to map public Christian voices across an x-axis that moves from emancipationists on the left and civilizationalists on the right.
Those are Green's terms, and emancipationists think of those who see their aims as trying to give people freedom and freedom of expression and to live out their identities. That's emancipationists. In civilizationalists, think of those who are trying to preserve Western civilization, and usually that means some type of Christian civilization.
That's the x-axis. The y-axis moves from minimalist at the bottom to maximalists at the top. Those two are Green's categories, minimalist, meaning people who are attempting their aims, but are doing so more or less according to the rules of modern liberal society.
I don't mean politically liberal, but rather classically liberal. They're trying to play within the rules of the game, you might say. The maximalists, those who sort of whatever it takes, mentality, the system is so broken that radical times demand radical measures.
That's sort of what he means across the x and the y-axis.
Like all metaschemes, Green's analysis isn't perfect as he readily acknowledges, but as a conversation starter, it introduces helpful categories. What made Green's analysis useful and controversial is that he named names.
For example, he put me in the civilizational minimalist category.
That is, just to refresh the categories, that he puts me as someone, not in the emancipation aside, but civilizational, trying to strengthen Western civilization and Christian culture, but in the minimalist camp that is according to the rules of the game in modern Western democratic societies. And you can read the piece and don't complain with where he puts me given the four quadrants he identifies.
Not surprisingly, some individuals did not agree with the quadrant they were assigned. In particular, Kristen Dumay of Calvin University did not appreciate being placed in the emancipatory maximalist category. Her response to being put in the illiberal quadrant was somewhat ironically given the charge of illiberality, quote, "excuse me, but what the hell?" end quote.
Jay Green then responded by noting how much he admires writers like Jamartisby, Beth Allison Barr, and Kristen Dumay, how his essay should have been clear, how he is quote, "very much a work in progress." John Fia, as the executive editor of Currents, and that's the place online where the article was published, admitted it was a mistake to have published Green's piece in its original form. Fia also added that Green was right to apologize to Dumay and that he, Fia, also wanted to affirm Dumay's liberality and apologize to her in public as he had already apologized in private. Underlying this apology fest is an ongoing debate about the role of the Christian historian.
In the latest issue of Fia's Historia, the Journal of the Conference on Faith in History, there are three printed plenary addresses, all dealing with the topic of Christian historians as activists. In his presidential address, John Fia describes how his own historical work has become more "sermonic." Fia tries to allow for different models, and given the three plenaries, his was trying to allow that historian as activist was not the only way to approach the subject. He does, however, sympathize with those who see black bodies in American streets, in the presence of patriarchy in our churches, and the selfish refusal of Christians to listen to science.
In her address, Dumay acknowledges that her book, Jesus and John Wayne, is activist history, but in her estimation, so are historical books that support the status quo. For decades, she writes, "The pursuit of Christian history has been dominated by white Protestant men." There's was an activist history for the powerful, so why shouldn't we have an activist history for the trampled and marginalized? Is the essence of her argument? In a final plenary address, Jamartisby insists that the "historian as activist" debate is "very white-centered." We all have biases, to be argues, the only question is whether we will be clear about them. "The question is about taking "sides." As activists and advocates, historians are called to take "sides." What are we to make of this historian as activist debate? Two quick thoughts.
First, for as much as the C.F.H. Conference on Faith and History talks about inclusion and the free exchange of ideas. It is clear that the present leadership of the historical guild assumes conclusions on the left. Thea writes, "We in the C.F.H. may not be a bunch of campus radicals, and some of us might have some mixed feelings about the agenda of the new left, or even the consensus Cold War liberals of the 1950s and 1960s." Wait, only mixed feelings, we might ask? Likewise, Tisby claims, "We are talking about issues that are pretty clear.
Either masks work to reduce the virus spread or they don't. Either the election was as legitimate as our elections ever are or it was stolen. Either Black Lives Matter or they don't." Besides the fact that the effectiveness of masking turned out to be far from clear, this is hardly a representative list of issues.
Might the Bible actually be clear about say abortion and gay marriage quote unquote, than about the effectiveness of masks? And when a calmly reasoned article like Greens prompts so much hand-ringing in such a flurry of apologies, one can be forgiven for wondering how open the guild really is to dissenting opinions and critical interaction. Second, the historian is activist approach sounds a lot like the scholarly approach that Mark Knoll, Nathan Hatch and George Marsden, formal and informal mentors to so many in the current generation of historians, sought to supplant. In their book from the 1980s, The Search for Christian America, Knoll Hatch and Marsden argued that quote, "Once we begin with our own commitments, the selection of the facts to fit them is all too easy.
The more so since selectivity is usually unconscious." End quote. The problem they saw on the right is now ever present on the left. Quote, "Rather than offering genuine insight into our own times," they wrote, "the past becomes just one more medium to convey positions which we already hold." What we need instead, they insist, Al-Aceus Lewis, is to open the windows to the clean sea breeze of the centuries.
Wise words, and a better approach than visiting the past, looking to settle scores for the present.
[MUSIC]

More From Life and Books and Everything

Christmas, Best Books, and Renewing Evangelicalism with Justin Taylor and Collin Hansen
Christmas, Best Books, and Renewing Evangelicalism with Justin Taylor and Collin Hansen
Life and Books and Everything
December 13, 2022
The gang is back for one last episode in 2022. There is the usual sports banter (very brief), and some good natured ribbing toward Justin, who seems t
Pastor, Don't Get Cute this Christmas
Pastor, Don't Get Cute this Christmas
Life and Books and Everything
December 14, 2022
Kevin reads from his article in The Gospel Coalition to encourage pastors to forego the cliche and cute and stick to preaching "the old, old story" th
The Promise of Christmas
The Promise of Christmas
Life and Books and Everything
December 23, 2022
In this episode of Life and Books and Everything, Kevin reads from his recent article in WORLD opinions about the curse in the garden, the hope and pr
What is Conservatism? with Daniel McCarthy
What is Conservatism? with Daniel McCarthy
Life and Books and Everything
December 7, 2022
Several months ago, Daniel McCarthy—editor of Modern Age and Editor-at-Large of The American Conservative—published an essay in First Things entitled
Who Was St. Nicholas?
Who Was St. Nicholas?
Life and Books and Everything
December 6, 2022
With what little we know about St. Nicholas, it is safe to say he would not be pleased to know he had eclipsed Christ in the hearts of many as the cen
What Should Christians Think About Same-Sex Marriage?
What Should Christians Think About Same-Sex Marriage?
Life and Books and Everything
December 1, 2022
In this article written for Crossway, Kevin discusses the meaning of the term "marriage" and how Christians should view same-sex unions.
More From "Life and Books and Everything"

More on OpenTheo

Bodily Resurrection vs Consensual Realities: A Licona Craffert Debate
Bodily Resurrection vs Consensual Realities: A Licona Craffert Debate
Risen Jesus
June 25, 2025
In today’s episode, Dr. Mike Licona debates Dr. Pieter Craffert at the University of Johannesburg. While Dr. Licona provides a positive case for the b
How Can I Tell My Patients They’re Giving Christianity a Negative Reputation?
How Can I Tell My Patients They’re Giving Christianity a Negative Reputation?
#STRask
August 7, 2025
Questions about whether there’s a gracious way to explain to manipulative and demanding patients that they’re giving Christianity a negative reputatio
Is It Problematic for a DJ to Play Songs That Are Contrary to His Christian Values?
Is It Problematic for a DJ to Play Songs That Are Contrary to His Christian Values?
#STRask
July 10, 2025
Questions about whether it’s problematic for a DJ on a secular radio station to play songs with lyrics that are contrary to his Christian values, and
An Ex-Christian Disputes Jesus' Physical Resurrection: Licona vs. Barker - Part 2
An Ex-Christian Disputes Jesus' Physical Resurrection: Licona vs. Barker - Part 2
Risen Jesus
July 16, 2025
In this episode , we have Dr. Mike Licona's first-ever debate. In 2003, Licona sparred with Dan Barker at the University of Wisonsin-Madison. Once a C
Sean McDowell: The Fate of the Apostles
Sean McDowell: The Fate of the Apostles
Knight & Rose Show
May 10, 2025
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose welcome Dr. Sean McDowell to discuss the fate of the twelve Apostles, as well as Paul and James the brother of Jesus. M
Shouldn’t We All Be Harvesters?
Shouldn’t We All Be Harvesters?
#STRask
August 4, 2025
Questions about how to handle objections from Christians who think we should all be harvesters and should not focus on gardening, and whether attendin
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Risen Jesus
May 7, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Bart Ehrman face off for the second time on whether historians can prove the resurrection. Dr. Ehrman says no
What Are the Top Five Things to Consider Before Joining a Church?
What Are the Top Five Things to Consider Before Joining a Church?
#STRask
July 3, 2025
Questions about the top five things to consider before joining a church when coming out of the NAR movement, and thoughts regarding a church putting o
What Do Statistical Mechanics Have to Say About Jesus' Bodily Resurrection? Licona vs. Cavin - Part 2
What Do Statistical Mechanics Have to Say About Jesus' Bodily Resurrection? Licona vs. Cavin - Part 2
Risen Jesus
July 30, 2025
The following episode is a debate from 2012 at Antioch Church in Temecula, California, between Dr. Licona and philosophy professor Dr. R. Greg Cavin o
Why Would We Need to Be in a Fallen World to Fully Know God?
Why Would We Need to Be in a Fallen World to Fully Know God?
#STRask
July 21, 2025
Questions about why, if Adam and Eve were in perfect community with God, we would need to be in a fallen world to fully know God, and why God cursed n
Licona and Martin: A Dialogue on Jesus' Claim of Divinity
Licona and Martin: A Dialogue on Jesus' Claim of Divinity
Risen Jesus
May 14, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Dale Martin discuss their differing views of Jesus’ claim of divinity. Licona proposes that “it is more proba
Is Morality Determined by Society?
Is Morality Determined by Society?
#STRask
June 26, 2025
Questions about how to respond to someone who says morality is determined by society, whether our evolutionary biology causes us to think it’s objecti
What Should I Teach My Students About Worldviews?
What Should I Teach My Students About Worldviews?
#STRask
June 2, 2025
Question about how to go about teaching students about worldviews, what a worldview is, how to identify one, how to show that the Christian worldview
What Would You Say to an Atheist Who Claims to Lack a Worldview?
What Would You Say to an Atheist Who Claims to Lack a Worldview?
#STRask
July 17, 2025
Questions about how to handle a conversation with an atheist who claims to lack a worldview, and how to respond to someone who accuses you of being “s
Can a Deceased Person’s Soul Live On in the Recipient of His Heart?
Can a Deceased Person’s Soul Live On in the Recipient of His Heart?
#STRask
May 12, 2025
Questions about whether a deceased person’s soul can live on in the recipient of his heart, whether 1 Corinthians 15:44 confirms that babies in the wo