Is Every Sin the Same in God’s Eyes?

Life and Books and Everything — Clearly Reformed

00:00

Is Every Sin the Same in God’s Eyes?

March 17, 2022

Life and Books and EverythingClearly Reformed

As much as it shows admirable humility or apologetic concern, we must not act or teach as if every sin is the same in God’s eyes.

Transcript

[Music] Greetings and salutations. Welcome to Life and Books and Everything. This is Kevin DeYoung and we have something new today.

I thought it might be worthwhile to read new articles as I write them at various venues. I'm not trying to overload folks but I know that increasingly a lot of us don't find time to read articles but we may listen to something for 15 minutes while we're driving in the car or brushing our teeth in the morning. Perhaps just putting the same content out in various medium media is helpful.

Here we go. This is an article that I published March 15 on my Kevin DeYoung. Org site is every sin the same in God's eyes.

Many Christians hold to the mistaken notion that every sin is the same in God's eyes. Some Christians embrace this conviction by way of a misguided theological calculation. If every sin deserves eternal judgment then every sin must be equally heinous they think.

Others promote the idea for apologetic reasons. Your sins are no worse than anyone else's sins. Your sins is the reasoning.

Still others believe in the equality of every sin out of genuine sense of humility. Who am I to think that my sins are less vile than anyone else's sins? While each of these reasons is understandable and in some sense commendable, the witness of Scripture and the testimony of the church's confessions tell a different story. The assumptions embedded throughout redemptive history make clear that some sins are worse than others.

Consider several examples. The Mosaic Law prescribed different penalties for different infractions and required different sacrifices and payments to make restitution. The Mosaic Law also distinguished between unintentional sins and high-handed sins.

Sins of rank idolatry and willful rebellion were more serious indictments on the kings of Israel and Judah than was the sin of failing to remove the high places in the land. God's anger was often specifically directed against the leaders of the people, that is the sin of the king or the priest or the elders meant greater judgment than the sins of the laity. Jesus warned that cities in which he performed his miracles would be more severely judged than Sodom and Gomorrah.

Jesus considered Judas' betrayal to be a sin worse than others. God's anger is especially roused when we sin against children the weak or the helpless. Communication seems to have been reserved for only the most flagrant sins.

Cornelius was considered a devout man who feared God, though not saved by his good works. Even among non-Christians, there is a difference between being a decent person and being a dirty rotten scoundrel. James teaches that there is a progression of sin from tempting desires to the internal nurture of those desires to external action to final death.

According to John, there is a sin that leads to death, but not all sins are unto death. Those are a variety of examples. The Bible simply doesn't make sense, not the Mosaic law, not the exile, not church discipline, not the frequent warnings of judgment for certain transgressions, if all sins are equally vile in God's eyes.

In fact, life doesn't make sense if every sin is the same. Parents do not discipline their children the same for every act of disobedience. Employers do not inflict the same punitive measures for every violation of company policy.

Law enforcement officers do not treat every offense in the same way. Our judicial system does not hand down the same punishments for every infraction. We all know instinctively that some transgressions are worse than others.

What we know to be true in ordinary life, we must not forget in our spiritual lives. As much as it shows admirable humility or apologetic concern, we must not act or teach as if every sin is the same in God's eyes. Here's where the confessional documents at the church are so valuable.

Take the Westminster larger catechism, for example, which makes clear that "all transgressions of the law of God are not equally heinous, but some sins in themselves, and by reason of several aggravations, are more heinous in the same way." More heinous in the sight of God than others. That's larger catechism 150. The larger catechism goes on to provide an extremely helpful analysis of what makes "some sins more heinous than others." Larger catechism 151.

According to the Westminster Divines, sins receive their aggravations from four different categories. It's worth looking at each one briefly. Here's the catechism number one.

"Sins are more heinous from the person's offending if they be of ripe or age, greater experience or grace, imminent for profession, gifts, place, office, guides to others, and whose example is likely to be followed by others." This means that sins are worse when they come from pastors or parents or public figures, when they come from those with a platform to use our language, when they come from those who teach and write books, and when they come from Christians who should know better. Here's the second section from the larger catechism. "Sins are worse when they come from the parties offended or based upon the parties offended.

If immediately against God his attributes and worship against Christ and his grace, the Holy Spirit, his witness and workings against superiors, men of eminency, and such as we stand, especially related and engaged unto against any of the saints, particularly weak brethren, the souls of them, or the people of the world." Here's the answer in the souls of them or any other and the common good of all or many. This means that sins are worse when they expressly blaspheme God or demean Christ in the gospel, when they reject the work of the Spirit in convicting of sin and revealing the truth, when they show disrespect to parents and persons in authority. When they ignore our weaker brothers and sisters, when they lead many astray and have a poisonous effect in society at large.

Here's the third item from the catechism. "Sins receive their aggravation from the nature and quality of the offense. If it be against the express letter of the law, break many commandments contained in it many sins.

If not only conceived in the heart but breaks forth in words and actions, scandalize others, and in mid of no reparation. If it means mercy's judgment, light of nature, conviction of conscience, public or private admonitions, censures of the church, civil punishments, and our prayers, purposes, promises, vows, covenants, and engagements to God or men. If done deliberately, willfully, presumptuously, impudently, boastingly, maliciously, frequently, obstinately with delight, continuance, or relapsing after repentance." This means that sins are worse when they deal with matters that are black or white instead of gray, when they break forth externally, not just internally, when they are frequent, when they are celebrated, when they cannot be undone, when they are against nature, against conscience, and against the warnings of others.

And then finally, the fourth category sins receive their aggravation from circumstances of time and place. If on the Lord's Day, or other times of divine worship, or immediately before or after these, or other helps to prevent, or remedy such miscarriages, if in public or in the presence of others, who are thereby likely to be provoked or defiled. This means that sins are worse when they take place in connection with the gathering of God's people for worship, when they could have been avoided, and when they are committed in public so as to be well known to others.

If you've never studied Westminster Larger Catechism 151, the four categories above, not to mention the dozens of scripture references I admitted, repay careful reading and meditation. I can think of at least three benefits, public, pastoral, and personal. When it comes to our public witness, we must have the courage to say that some sins are worse than others.

Sins by pastors are worse than sins by parishioners. Sins by public figures with many followers are worse than sins by private individuals. And although all sexual sins are serious, we should not shrink back from teaching that sins against the light of nature, by which the larger catechism means homosexuality, the sole reference is Romans 1, 26, and 27, are especially heinous, particularly when these sins are committed with delight and to the detriment of the common good.

Pasturally, we can distinguish among various degrees of sin, and that can help us apply the comfort and the warnings of scripture more judiciously. Some of us are quick to pull the punch when the Bible would have as issue a stern warning, while others are ready to thunder judgment against our people for every offense. Likewise, when we learn to discern how sins receive their aggravations, we will have the proper categories to hold people responsible for the lesser sins, even when others have sinned more grievously against them.

And finally, there are personal benefits to understanding the varieties of sins in the Bible. Too many Christians have flattened the moral contours of revelations such that we no longer distinguish between falling into sin and running headlong into sin. This means that some of us are too hard on ourselves, seeing no moral space between fallen temptations and flagrant disobedience.

Some of us are too easy on ourselves, believing our heinous sins to be little more than, quote, struggles or mistakes. And many of us give up striving after holiness because we will never completely leave sin behind in this life. The Bible points us in a different direction.

Every sin deserves God's wrath and curse, but not every sin is the same in God's eyes. Until next time, glorify God, enjoy him forever, and read a good book.

[Music]

(buzzing)