OpenTheo

June 11th: Ezekiel 16 & Acts 13:13-43

Alastair Roberts
00:00
00:00

June 11th: Ezekiel 16 & Acts 13:13-43

June 10, 2021
Alastair Roberts
Alastair Roberts

Jerusalem the adulterous prostitute. Paul's first sermon in the book of Acts.

Reflections upon the readings from the ACNA Book of Common Prayer (http://bcp2019.anglicanchurch.net/). My reflections are searchable by Bible chapter here: https://audio.alastairadversaria.com/explore/.

If you have enjoyed my output, please tell your friends. If you are interested in supporting my videos and podcasts and my research more generally, please consider supporting my work on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/zugzwanged), using my PayPal account (https://bit.ly/2RLaUcB), or by buying books for my research on Amazon (https://www.amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/ls/36WVSWCK4X33O?ref_=wl_share).

The audio of all of my videos is available on my Soundcloud account: https://soundcloud.com/alastairadversaria. You can also listen to the audio of these episodes on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/alastairs-adversaria/id1416351035?mt=2.

Share

Transcript

Ezekiel chapter 16. Again the word of the Lord came to me, Son of man, make known to Jerusalem her abominations, and say, Thus says the Lord God to Jerusalem, Your origin and your birth are of the land of the Canaanites. Your father was an Amorite, and your mother a Hittite.
And as for your birth, on the day you were born your cord was not cut, nor were you washed with water to cleanse you, nor rubbed with salt, nor wrapped in swaddling cloths. No eye pitied you to do any of these things to you out of compassion for you, but you were cast out on the open field, for you were abhorred on the day that you were born. And when I passed by you and saw you wallowing in your blood, I said to you in your blood, Live! I said to you in your blood, Live! I made you flourish like a plant of the field, and you grew up and became tall and arrived at full adornment.
Your breasts were formed, and your hair had grown, yet you were naked and bare. When I passed by you again and saw you, behold, you were at the age for love, and I spread the corner of my garment over you and covered your nakedness. I made my vow to you and entered into a covenant with you, declares the Lord God, and you became mine.
Then I bathed you with water and washed off your blood from you and anointed you with oil.
I clothed you also with embroidered cloth and shod you with fine leather. I wrapped you in fine linen and covered you with silk, and I adorned you with ornaments and put bracelets on your wrists and a chain on your neck, and I put a ring on your nose and earrings in your ears and a beautiful crown on your head.
Thus you were adorned with gold and silver, and your
clothing was of fine linen and silk and embroidered cloth. You ate fine flour and honey and oil. You grew exceedingly beautiful and advanced to royalty, and your renown went forth among the nations because of your beauty, for it was perfect through the splendor that I had bestowed on you, declares the Lord God.
But you trusted in your beauty and played the whore because of your
renown and lavished your whorings on any passerby. Your beauty became his. You took some of your garments and made for yourself colorful shrines and on them played the whore.
The like has never been.
Nor ever shall be. You also took your beautiful jewels of my gold and of my silver, which I had given you, and made for yourself images of men, and with them played the whore.
And you took your
embroidered garments to cover them and set my oil and my incense before them, also my bread that I gave you. I fed you with fine flour and oil and honey you set before them for a pleasing aroma, and so it was, declares the Lord God. And you took your sons and your daughters, whom you had borne to me, and these you sacrificed to them to be devoured.
Were your whorings so small a matter
that you slaughtered my children and delivered them up as an offering by fire to them? And in all your abominations and your whorings you did not remember the days of your youth when you were naked and bare, wallowing in your blood. And after all your wickedness, woe, woe to you, declares the Lord God. You built yourself a vaulted chamber and made yourself a lofty place in every square.
At the head of every street you built your lofty place and made your beauty an abomination, offering yourself to any passerby and multiplying your whoring. You also played the whore with the Egyptians, your lustful neighbors, multiplying your whoring to provoke me to anger. Behold, therefore, I stretched out my hand against you and diminished your allotted portion and delivered you to the greed of your enemies, the daughters of the Philistines, who were ashamed of your lewd behavior.
You played the whore also with the Assyrians, because you were not satisfied. Yes,
you played the whore with them, and still you were not satisfied. You multiplied your whoring also with the trading land of Chaldea, and even with this you were not satisfied.
How sick is your
heart, declares the Lord God, because you did all these things, the deeds of a brazen prostitute, building your vaulted chamber at the head of every street and making your lofty place in every square. Yet you were not like a prostitute, because you scorned payment, a dolterous wife who received strangers instead of her husband. Men give gifts to all prostitutes, but you gave your gifts to all your lovers, bribing them to come to you from every side with your whorings.
So you were different from
other women in your whorings. No one solicited you to play the whore, and you gave payment, while no payment was given to you. Therefore you were different.
Therefore, O prostitute,
hear the word of the Lord. Thus says the Lord God, because your lust was poured out and your nakedness uncovered in your whorings with your lovers and with all your abominable idols, and because of the blood of your children that you gave to them. Therefore, behold, I will gather all your lovers with whom you took pleasure, all those you loved and all those you hated.
I will gather
them against you from every side and will uncover your nakedness to them, that they may see all your nakedness. And I will judge you as women who commit adultery and shed blood are judged, and bring upon you the blood of wrath and jealousy. And I will give you into their hands, and they shall throw down your vaulted chamber and break down your lofty places.
They shall strip you of
your clothes and take your beautiful jewels and leave you naked and bare. They shall bring up a crowd against you, and they shall stone you and cut you to pieces with their swords. And they shall burn your houses and execute judgments upon you in the sight of many women.
I will make you stop
playing the whore, and you shall also give payment no more. So will I satisfy my wrath on you, and my jealousy shall depart from you. I will be calm and will no more be angry, because you have not remembered the days of your youth, but have enraged me with all these things.
Therefore,
behold, I have returned your deeds upon your head, declares the Lord God. Have you not committed lewdness in addition to all your abominations? Behold, everyone who uses proverbs will use this proverb about you, like mother, like daughter. You are the daughter of your mother, who loathed her husband and her children.
And you are the sister of your sisters, who loathed their husbands and
their children. Your mother was a Hittite, and your father an Amorite, and your elder sister is Samaria, who lived with her daughters to the north of you. And your younger sister, who lived to the south of you, is Sodom, with her daughters.
Not only did you walk in their ways, and do according
to their abominations, within a very little time you were more corrupt than they in all your ways. As I live, declares the Lord God, your sister Sodom and her daughters have not done as you and your daughters have done. Behold, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom.
She and her daughters had pride,
excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy. They were haughty, and did an abomination before me. So I removed them when I saw it.
Samaria has not committed half your sins.
You have committed more abominations than they, and have made your sisters appear righteous by all the abominations that you have committed. Bear your disgrace, you also, for you have intervened on behalf of your sisters.
Because of your sins in which you acted more abominably than they,
they are more in the right than you. So be ashamed, you also, and bear your disgrace, for you have made your sisters appear righteous. I will restore their fortunes, both the fortunes of Sodom and her daughters, and the fortunes of Samaria and her daughters.
And I will restore
your own fortunes in their midst, that you may bear your disgrace, and be ashamed of all that you have done, becoming a consolation to them. As for your sisters, Sodom and her daughters shall return to their former state, and Samaria and her daughters shall return to their former state, and you and your daughters shall return to your former state. Was not your sister Sodom a byword in your mouth in the day of your pride, before your wickedness was uncovered? Now you have become an object of reproach for the daughters of Syria, and all those around her, and for the daughters of the Philistines, those all around who despise you.
You bear the penalty of your lewdness, and your
abominations, declares the Lord. For thus says the Lord God, I will deal with you as you have done, you who have despised the oath in breaking the covenant. Yet I will remember my covenant with you in the days of your youth, and I will establish for you an everlasting covenant.
Then you will
remember your ways, and be ashamed when you take your sisters, both your elder and your younger, and I give them to you as daughters, but not on account of the covenant with you. I will establish my covenant with you, and you shall know that I am the Lord, that you may remember and be confounded, and never open your mouth again because of your shame, when I atone for you for all that you have done, declares the Lord God. Ezekiel chapter 16 is a long, important and troubling passage.
It's a prophetic oracle that develops the motif of Israel as the unfaithful bride of the Lord. This is a motif familiar from many other parts of scripture, most notably in places like the book of Hosea. The passage presents the sin of the house of Israel in a manner that conveys the scale of its betrayal and the magnitude of its offence.
By the extended development of the
analogy of gross marital infidelity, the intended audience are brought to feel the force of the message of the oracle on a visceral level. The analogy also involves a jarring retelling of the story of the house of Israel, which shakes the house of Israel's conventional self-understanding to its very foundations. People and nations understand themselves in terms of big narratives, narratives that can often have an almost sacred status.
Those who challenge such narratives can
get themselves in trouble, they can excite fierce opposition. A reconstruction of your people's core history in the manner of Ezekiel chapter 16 will infuriate many. It also challenges people to consider the familiar from a perspective that might lead them to see what is closest to them in a radically different manner.
As several commentators observe, while this is softened
in most translations, the language of this oracle has a near pornographic character at points, so graphic is it in its development of the analogy. It describes male and female genitalia also in their states of arousal. Some chalk this down to scripture's greater earthiness, and that's partly true, but we should recognise that the immodesty of the language is calculated to accentuate a sense of disgust at the obscenity of what the house of Israel did.
This is not the
sort of language one finds typically used of licit sexual relations. The chapter is one of biting satire, of caricature and hyperbole, as Joseph Blenkinsop argues. The oracle begins with an instruction to Ezekiel to make known Jerusalem's abominations to her.
The oracle serves the purpose
of presenting the iniquity of the people in the very sharpest relief, articulating it in a way that would provoke revulsion in all hearers. This is done through a parabolic telling of the story of Israel. The people of Israel were likely accustomed to telling their story in a way that accentuated the faithfulness of their father Abraham, the deliverance of the exodus, and the Lord's identification with Israel as his people, especially seen in his establishment of the temple as his dwelling place in their midst in Jerusalem.
For those used to hearing the story
told in such a manner, Ezekiel's retelling could not be more jarring. Abraham and his call drops out in Ezekiel's telling. Rather, Israel finds its origins in the land of the Canaanites, a land of paganism and idolatry, set apart for destruction by the Lord.
Their parentage,
far from being traced back to faithful Abraham and Sarah, is recorded as that of an Amorite father and a Hittite mother, the two leading peoples of the land prior to the conquest. These associations are shocking. Surely these are the very peoples that Israel displaced.
These statements should not be taken in an overly literalistic manner. The point is not that of denying Abrahamic ancestry altogether. Rather, the ancestry being given is primarily spiritual ancestry.
That said, on the other hand, we shouldn't miss the degree to which the literal
claim could be made. Israel has intermarried with the Canaanites extensively over the course of the years. The idea that they could claim Abrahamic pedigree for themselves without considering their far more spiritually determinative ancestry from the idolatrous Canaanites is rather presumptuous on their part.
They may regard themselves as the true children of Abraham, but the Lord sees them
very differently. Furthermore, the prophecy is partly about Jerusalem. It's a city that pre-existed its Israelite inhabitation, being a Jebusite city at the time of its capture.
The exposure of unwanted infants after their birth was ancient society's counterpart to abortion in contemporary society. Jerusalem suffered such cruel abandonment, coming into the world unwelcomed and unloved. It did not receive the customary treatment that a newborn child would receive, the cutting of the umbilical cord, washing with water, rubbing with salt.
The exact purpose of
this is unclear, but it remains practiced in some societies down to the present day, and wrapping and swaddling cloths. Left out to die in the open field, whether being consumed by wild animals or dying of exposure to the elements or of starvation, Jerusalem's fate seemed hopeless. No one was concerned for or pitied her.
At this point, the Lord happens to pass by and to see
the vulnerable and abandoned infant Jerusalem, taking pity upon her. In this situation of abandonment, he claims the unwanted child as his own, adopting her through deliverance. On account of the Lord's care, the girl thrived and grew to sexual maturity.
The growth here
should presumably be related to Israel's multiplication in the land of Egypt, for instance. Having visited Israel in her earliest life, in the time of the patriarchs, the Lord visits her again when she arrives at sexual maturity, when she is at the age for love. Israel is still naked at this point, but her nakedness is not that of an abandoned infant, but of an attractive, sexually mature young woman, of the kind that would make her the object of male advances.
Just as the Lord addressed the nakedness of the infant Jerusalem, so he addresses her nakedness in her young womanhood, spreading his garment over her in a marital act, vowing to her, and entering into a covenant of marriage. The historical event behind all of this is almost certainly the covenant of Sinai. This represents a sort of double adoption.
The abandoned infant
is adopted as a child, and the young woman is taken as a wife. Verse 9 accentuates the symmetry between these two adoptions. It speaks of the Lord's bathing of Jerusalem with water, washing her blood from her and anointing her with oil, and this almost certainly does not refer to the actions that he performed for the abandoned infant, but to the actions of a loving husband towards his bride, especially after their first sexual union.
We should beware of reading this
imagery in a rigid fashion. Were we to do so, it would give a very strange and perhaps inappropriate impression. The Lord seemingly rescues an infant girl, and has relatively little to do with her, before seeing her when she has grown to sexual maturity, still being naked, and decides to marry his adopted child.
The imagery is operating in a much more flexible fashion. It enables the reader
to see both the consistency and development of the Lord's loving relationship to Israel, through successive metaphorical frames. The consistency is found not on the level of the surface imagery, but in the reality to which the imagery refers.
This is especially important to
bear in mind, as the language of the prophecy goes in even more shocking directions, as the unfaithful bride is stripped and subjected to violence. The imagery appalls our modern sensibilities, but we really should not assume that ancient Israelite sensibilities would have been untroubled by such images. Here it is important always to keep in mind the interplay of the concrete historical referent, the wicked covenant-breaking and idolatrous house of Israel, and the adoptee and bride of the analogy.
It is the cross-pollination of the concrete referent and the analogy that
makes the oracle so rhetorically powerful and effective in giving us a sense of the depths of the house of Israel's sin and betrayal, and the fierceness of the Lord's anger. The Lord dresses his new bride in the finest of attire, and adorns her with precious ornaments. We might perhaps think of the tabernacle and its treasures.
We should also see that the Lord made Israel a queen, establishing
her as royalty within the land where he placed her, also giving her royal food, just as she had flourished as a young infant after the Lord's compassionate care for her. So the new bride flourishes. She gains renown and prominence among the surrounding nations.
We might think of such things as the
glories of the reign of Solomon, when people from various nations round about came to hear the wisdom of Solomon and to see the glories of his kingdom. The once abandoned infant, wallowing in her blood, has been elevated to the status of a queen, whose glory is marvelled at on all sides. However, as Jerusalem becomes great, she also becomes proud in the glory that she had been given by the Lord, trusting in her own splendour and might, over the Lord who had bestowed such riches and benefits upon her.
As a result, Jerusalem abandoned the Lord and played the whore. Jerusalem
is described as a nymphomaniac, wanting the attentions of everyone who passes by. Like an adulterous woman using the marriage bed as the place for her adultery, unfaithful Jerusalem takes all of the treasures that the Lord has given, the beautiful jewels of gold and silver, the precious garments that she had been given, and puts all of these things along with the bread that the Lord had granted her, at the service of her adulteries and idolatries.
Her adulteries are
described in a way that plays off the two different levels of meaning. On one level we see the nation setting up shrines for its idolatries, and on the other level we see a prostitute at the street corner having a pedestal from which she would appeal to customers. Much as the children of Israel with the golden calf in the story of the Exodus, Jerusalem used the treasures that the Lord had given to fashion images with which she could perform her adulteries.
Idols are here being
described as if they were a sort of sex doll. On top of all of her other abominations, Jerusalem presents the children that she was supposed to have borne to the Lord to these idols and false gods. In all of this she was completely forgetful of the way that the Lord had shown mercy and grace to her at the beginning of her story.
The ingratitude compounds all of her other sins.
Jerusalem performed her adulteries in every single part of the land and the city. No part of the promised land was left undefiled by her.
Indeed her sin was so egregious that it stood out even
among her neighbours. She played the whore with the Egyptians. Israel had been explicitly warned in the book of Deuteronomy not to return to the Egyptians, especially to gather up horses and chariots.
Yet Solomon married the daughter of Pharaoh and became the main horse trader for the
Egyptians within the region. In such a manner he sought security for the nation in alliance with the Egyptians rather than in covenant faithfulness to the Lord. Later their eyes turned to Assyria for security and then later to Babylon.
As Ezekiel argues, the analogy with the prostitute breaks down.
A prostitute performs her favours for money whereas Jerusalem paid others for her adulteries. Having presented the indictment against Jerusalem, the Lord now gives the sentence.
The very lovers
that she had paid her bribes to would turn against her and destroy her. We might think here of Jeremiah chapter 4 verses 30 to 31. There Judah is also spoken of as a whore, an adulterous woman.
And you, O desolate one, what do you mean that you dress in scarlet, that you adorn yourself with ornaments of gold, that you enlarge your eyes with paint? In vain you beautify yourself. Your lovers despise you. They seek your life.
For I heard a cry as of a woman in labour,
anguish as of one giving birth to her first child, the cry of the daughter of Zion gasping for breath, stretching out her hands. Woe is me, I am fainting before murderers. Jerusalem is guilty of adultery and of murder, having killed her children for the sake of her lovers.
The Lord will uncover
Jerusalem's nakedness, making her vulnerable to those who would want to assault her. They will strip Jerusalem, tear down her pedestals, gather a mob against her, stone her, cut her to pieces, and then burn all of her habitations. On one level this is an image of the brutal treatment received by a prostitute by a community.
On another level it's the description of what would
happen to Jerusalem as its defences would be torn down, as it would be laid bare for attack, as its former lords and allies would be gathered together against her and destroy her. Her treasures would be stripped from her temple and treasuries. She would be put to the sword, her city burned, and then her children sent off into exile.
Through this devastating judgment,
Jerusalem would no longer be able to play the harlot. Her adulteries would forcibly be put to an end. Earlier in the chapter Jerusalem had been spoken of as having a mother who was a Hittite and a father who was an Amorite.
Here in verses 44-46 that connection is developed yet further.
Not only does she have such parentage, she also has sisters in Sodom and Samaria. The image of the northern kingdom as an adulterous sister to the adulterous southern kingdom is one that we see in Jeremiah chapter 3 verses 6-10 for instance.
The Lord said to me in the days of King Josiah,
Have you seen what she did, that faithless one Israel? How she went up on every high hill and under every green tree, and there played the whore? And I thought, After she has done all this, she will return to me. But she did not return, and her treacherous sister Judas saw it. She saw that for all the adulteries of that faithless one Israel, I had sent her away with a decree of divorce.
Yet her treacherous sister Judah did not fear, but she too went and played the whore.
Because she took her whoredom lightly, she polluted the land, committing adultery with stone and tree. Yet for all this, her treacherous sister Judah did not return to me with her whole heart, but in pretense, declares the Lord.
In that chapter of Jeremiah the Lord declares that the
southern kingdom of Judah is worse than her northern sister. Here a similar point is made. Jerusalem shares her character with her Hittite mother and with her sisters Samaria and Sodom.
Sodom likely stands not just for that particular city, but for the cities of the plain and the Canaanite civilization that preceded the Israelites more broadly. Through intermarriage and unfaithfulness, the Israelites had significantly intermingled with the Sodomites and their heirs. Just as Lot and his daughters had taken on board the ways of the Sodomites and had given rise to the nations of Moab and Ammon, so Israel also absorbed much of the character of the Sodomites.
Indeed, it was not long before she outmatched them in wickedness. Sodom was a city of inhospitality, of decadence, of pride, of sexual immorality, and all of this came to a head in its committing of abomination before the Lord, probably referring to the attempted homosexual rape in Genesis chapter 19. That sin was not a bolt from a clear blue sky.
It was the culmination of a great series of sins
and attitudes that had been festering in that culture for a long time. As Sodom's sin came to a head, the Lord removed them in punishment. However, the sin of Jerusalem exceeded Sodom's.
Samaria's too. By comparison with Jerusalem, whose sins were committed against even greater blessing, Sodom and Samaria's sins pale in comparison. Remarkably, the chapter ends on a note of restoration.
Even these three wicked sisters would be restored in their fortunes. The restoration of
the fortunes of Sodom probably refers to the restoration of the peoples of the land among Israel. Israel was not just formed of pure descendants of Abraham, but of a mixed multitude that travelled out of Egypt with them, people who had intermarried with the Israelites in the land and others who were resident aliens.
As Jerusalem and these other places were restored to their
former estate, Jerusalem would be ashamed among her sisters, bearing her disgrace for all the sins that she had committed. On account of her egregious covenant unfaithfulness, Jerusalem would be decisively cut off. The Lord would deal with her as she has done.
However, the covenant always
depended primarily upon the Lord's commitment to his people. We saw this at the beginning of the chapter. It was the Lord who took the initiative in rescuing the infant Jerusalem.
It was the Lord
who took the initiative in taking Jerusalem under his wing and marrying her. The Lord once again will take the initiative in remembering his covenant and establishing an everlasting covenant with Jerusalem. The Lord's remembrance of his covenant would also lead Jerusalem to remember her ways and her former deeds and to be ashamed of all that she had done.
But the magnitude of
sin would not be seen primarily in the magnitude of its punishment, but when seen in terms of the radical grace that the Lord bestows upon her. She will take her sisters, these cities of Sodom and Samaria, not just as sisters, but as daughters. They will be brought into participation in the blessings that Jerusalem has received as those who come under her.
This won't be on account of
anything great that Jerusalem herself has done, but purely out of sheer divine mercy. Once again, at the end of this chapter, we have a recognition formula. I will establish my covenant with you and you shall know that I am the Lord.
The Lord's intention from the very beginning,
when he adopted this abandoned child, his purpose as he took this young woman under his wing, was to establish and perfect his covenant so that the house of Israel would be perfected in relationship with God. And as this relationship was established in remarkable divine grace, Israel would finally discover the magnitude of its sin as it saw it as the gulf that the Lord spanned in grace to reach her. A question to consider, how can this chapter help us to better understand the character of divine grace in salvation? Acts chapter 13 verses 13 to 43.
Now Paul and his companions set sail from Paphos and came to Perga in Pamphylia, and John left them and returned to Jerusalem. But they went on from Perga and came to Antioch in Pisidia. And on the Sabbath day they went into the synagogue and sat down.
After the reading from the
law and the prophets, the rulers of the synagogue sent a message to them, saying, Brothers, if you have any word of encouragement for the people, say it. So Paul stood up and motioning with his hands said, Men of Israel and you who fear God, listen. The God of this people Israel chose our fathers and made the people great during their stay in the land of Egypt.
And with uplifted arm
he led them out of it. And for about forty years he put up with them in the wilderness. And after destroying seven nations in the land of Canaan, he gave them their land as an inheritance.
All this
took about four hundred and fifty years. And after that he gave them judges and told Samuel the prophet. Then they asked for a king, and God gave them Saul the son of Kish, a man of the tribe of Benjamin, for forty years.
And when he had removed him, he raised up David to be their king, of whom
he testified and said, I have found in David the son of Jesse, a man after my heart, who will do all my will. Of this man's offspring God has brought to Israel a Savior Jesus, as he promised. Before his coming John had proclaimed a baptism of repentance to all the people of Israel.
And as John was finishing his course he said, What do you suppose that I am? I am not he. No, but behold, after me one is coming, the sandals of whose feet I am not worthy to untie. Brothers, sons of the family of Abraham, and those among you who fear God, to us has been sent the message of this salvation, for those who live in Jerusalem and their rulers, because they did not recognize him, nor understand the utterances of the prophets, which are read every Sabbath, fulfill them by condemning him.
And though they found in him no guilt worthy of death,
they asked Pilate to have him executed. And when they carried out all that was written of him, they took him down from the tree and laid him in a tomb. But God raised him from the dead, and for many days he appeared to those who had come up with him from Galilee to Jerusalem, who are now his witnesses to the people.
And we bring you the good news that what God promised
to the fathers, this he has fulfilled to us their children, by raising Jesus, as also it is written in the second psalm, You are my son, today I have begotten you. And as for the fact that he raised him from the dead, no more to return to corruption, he has spoken in this way, I will give you the holy and sure blessings of David. Therefore he says also in another psalm, You will not let your holy ones see corruption.
For David, after he had served the purpose of God in his own generation,
fell asleep, and was laid with his fathers and saw corruption. But he whom God raised up did not see corruption. Let it be known to you therefore, brothers, that through this man forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you, and by him everyone who believes is freed from everything from which you could not be freed by the law of Moses.
Beware therefore, lest what is said in the
prophets should come about. Look, you scoffers, be astounded and perish, for I am doing a work in your days, a work that you will not believe, even if one tells it to you. As they went out, the people begged that these things might be told them the next Sabbath.
And after the meeting of
the synagogue broke up, many Jews and devout converts to Judaism followed Paul and Barnabas, who, as they spoke with them, urged them to continue in the grace of God. The heart of Acts chapter 13 contains one of the great sermons of the book of Acts, comparable to Peter's sermon on the day of Pentecost or Stephen's speech in chapter 7. This is Paul's inaugural sermon in the book of Acts, and it might play a special role in characterising his message more generally. Craig Keener notes a number of elements of distinctively Pauline style, and some prominent themes of Pauline theology within it.
Paul, Barnabas and their companions had begun their mission on the island of Cyprus, from which they now sailed for the mainland of Asia Minor, modern day Turkey. From Perga they go about 100 miles north as the crow flies, up to the highlands. Pisidian Antioch is a different Antioch from the one from which they set out.
There were 16 different Antiochs in the ancient
world. According to Josephus, there was a large Jewish population in the city, and about 2,000 Jewish families in the region. Paul and his companions go into a synagogue, and there's a reading from the law and the prophets which would have been part of a regular synagogue service.
It's important to consider that such public readings of the scriptures
were commonplace and routine. They would have sometimes been accompanied by some exposition, although this was likely less regular. Keener suggests that the messages were likely more focused on moral exhortation and comfort.
Those attending such synagogues would be expected to
have a substantial familiarity with the scriptural text though. Paul and his companions are invited to speak by the rulers of the synagogue after the regular parts of the proceedings have occurred. This might be because it's become known that Paul is someone who has studied the law more formally, and because Barnabas is a Levite.
Paul gets up to speak and he addresses the Jews present,
along with the God-fearing Gentiles. It has been suggested that Paul would have been weaving together some of the liturgical readings in his message, connecting their message together, and moving them into a greater message about Jesus. He retells in summary the entire history of the nation, from the Exodus to the raising up of David, recounting the wilderness wanderings and the conquest of the land, a period taking roughly 450 years.
He skates over the period of
the judges prior to Samuel, before discussing King Saul, Israel's first but unsatisfactory king of the tribe of Benjamin. Saul of Tarsus' name has only just been switched to Paul in Luke's narrative, and the reference to Saul here might make us wonder whether there is a connection between the two. I believe that there is.
If we look through the Old Testament, we see that King
Saul is in many ways a paradigmatic persecutor. He is the one who fights against the true king. He is the king of Israel, but he opposes David, the rightful successor.
He tries to kill him with
his spear, he tries to put him in harm's way fighting the Philistines, he is implacable in his pursuit of and his opposition to David. And yet God arrests him in his steps at various points, and there are some very strange twists in that story. As we look through the story of Saul of Tarsus, we will notice a similar pattern.
Saul begins as a zealous persecutor of the church,
breathing out murderous threats, seeking to take the disciples into prison and bring them before the high priest and eventually put them to death. There is a similarity between these two characters, and within the book of Acts this is presented not just as a matter of persecuting the individual disciples, but as persecuting Christ himself. Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me? Not just my disciples, but why do you persecute me? The greater David is asking Saul of Tarsus why he is pursuing him, why he is persecuting him, what he has done to deserve his opposition.
In 1 Samuel chapter 20,
we find David asking Jonathan a similar question about Saul. What have I done? What is my guilt? And what is my sin before your father that he seeks my life? Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me? In 1 Samuel chapter 19, there is also an interesting incident that might remind us of Saul's conversion or his illumination on the road to Damascus. King Saul goes to pursue David to Niath in Ramah, and the Spirit of God comes upon him and he prophesies until he comes there.
And he
too stripped off his clothes, and he too prophesied before Samuel, and lay naked all that day and all that night. Thus it is said, is Saul also among the prophets? It is a remarkable event and it might recall some of the things that are described in connection with Saul's conversion event on the road to Damascus. There is an interruption of his course of persecution and pursuit, and there is a period of waiting, all day and all night in the story of King Saul, and a number of days for Saul before Ananias comes and baptises him in the story of Acts.
These parallels a potential conversion
event in what happens to King Saul when the Spirit comes upon him and he prophesies, and the question that David asks Jonathan, why is your father persecuting me? Recall the events on the road to Damascus. But whereas King Saul arrests his pursuit of David only for a time, and it doesn't really amount to anything in the end, the arresting of Saul of Tarsus leads to a complete change. From that point on, his character is completely transformed, he becomes the key apostle, even though he was the least of the apostles on account of his persecution of the church.
King Saul said that he was from the least tribe, from the least family of that tribe in Israel, and yet God raised him up to be king. And there is something quite similar in the story of Saul of Tarsus. He was the least qualified, the least worthy to be an apostle, but God raised him up, in many ways, to be the greatest of the apostles, or a leader among the apostles.
Another thing to notice about these parallels is that David, as he is pursued by Saul, is let down through a window by Michael and escapes. A similar thing happens to Saul after his conversion. He is let down through a gap in the wall of Damascus in a basket, and escapes while they are guarding the gates.
That pursuit of Saul of Tarsus might remind us of the pursuit of David
and his escape from King Saul, but there is a switch of the characters. The king who pursued the lion of the tribe of Judah is now changed to the one who is converted, and is a true servant of the king, and takes on the character of that king. He too is trying to escape as King David did now, no longer the persecutor, but the one who is being pursued.
Saul is the king who is
removed in order that David, from whom comes the Messiah, will come on the scene. So that framework of Saul being replaced by David is at play within the book of Acts. This might help us to understand why in the immediately preceding passage to this, there is a switch from Saul to Paul.
That switch
of names draws our mind back to that replacement, that changing of the character of Saul. In his speech, Stephen had focused upon the characters of Joseph and Moses, and now Paul focuses upon David, because David is the ancestor of Jesus, who is his true son, and the one in whom the messianic hope of Israel is fulfilled. Having introduced Jesus as the true son of David, he proceeds to tell the gospel story, beginning with the ministry of John the Baptist and ending with the resurrection and the appointment of witnesses to it.
It's worth remembering that Paul is addressing diaspora Jews
here, who were distinct from the Jews of Palestine, whether in Jerusalem in particular, or Judea more generally. They had quite possibly gotten wind of some of the events that had happened in Jerusalem concerning Jesus, and of the rapid rise of a new sect there, but they might not have known much beyond that. However, they might be more familiar with the ministry of John the Baptist, which might be why Paul gives rather more attention to John's witness.
Jesus was condemned by those who lived in
Jerusalem and their rulers, because of their failure to recognise him or to understand the scriptures. They ironically fulfilled the scriptures by condemning Christ. Speaking to diaspora Jews, the gospel's unflattering portrayal of the Jewish leaders in Jerusalem might have had a different resonance.
It's important that we bear in mind how diverse the Jewish population was, how widely
spread out they were, how many internal sects and factions they had, and the differences between, for instance, a Jew of the ruling classes in Jerusalem, a poorer member of the crowd in Jerusalem, a Jew living in a Galilean village, a Samaritan, or an educated diaspora Jew with Jerusalem connections like Paul, or even a diaspora Jew without such connections, or extensive travel, living in a place like North Africa, for instance. Perhaps this might be one of the reasons why Paul mentions that Jesus' followers came with him from Galilee to Jerusalem. They weren't Jerusalem insiders.
In Jesus, God fulfilled the promises made to the fathers by raising Jesus up as the
Davidic King. There is a fulfilment of the second psalm here, you are my son, today I have begotten you. His raising from the dead fulfills the promises concerning the Davidic King, promises referenced in Isaiah chapter 55 verse 3 as being for the benefit of the whole people.
The Davidic covenant
concerns the elevation of the whole nation in which all of the people are glorified. As in Peter's Pentecost sermon in Acts chapter 2, Paul references Psalm 16 verse 10, making much the same argument from it as Peter did. The psalm promises the raising up of David, but it can't ultimately refer to David himself, who died and was buried.
Rather, it must refer to David the dynasty. The Davidic
dynasty is raised up in Jesus of Nazareth. Not just Jesus, but the Davidic dynasty seemed utterly dead.
It's been removed, leaving only the stump of Jesse. But like a root out of dry ground, this one will rise up, the one who will fulfil the promises given to David, even when it seemed that David and his house were no more. Through God's action in the resurrection, David does not see corruption, but reigns eternally in his greatest son, Jesus of Nazareth.
Through Jesus, forgiveness of sins
is proclaimed. John's baptism was a baptism of repentance in preparation for the forgiveness of sins that Jesus brings. Through Jesus, justification is offered, total forgiveness, total clearing of the slate, which the law of Moses could never offer or achieve.
The term that Paul uses here is the term
that he typically uses for justification. Translated as freed here, it helps us to capture some sense of the term justified that is often neglected. We also encounter such a use of the verb in Romans chapter 6 verse 7, for one who has died has been set free, or justified, from sin.
In Christ, people
can be placed in good standing with God through him, which they could never be by the law. They are released from the debt by forgiveness. There is however a warning from Habakkuk chapter 1 verse 5 attached.
When God acts so powerfully and decisively in salvation, it is a most serious thing to reject,
to neglect, or to scorn his deliverance. Responding faithfully is imperative, a matter of the utmost urgency and importance. Those who scoff at God's salvation will perish utterly.
The response of the
people is very positive. After the meeting is over, many of the Jews, and the proselytes and the God fearers, follow after Paul and Barnabas. They want to find out more, and Paul and Barnabas urge them to continue in the grace of God.
A question to consider. In this, Paul's first sermon in the book
of Acts, what are some of the connections that we could draw between his message here, and various themes that he brings out in his epistles?

More on OpenTheo

Licona and Martin: A Dialogue on Jesus' Claim of Divinity
Licona and Martin: A Dialogue on Jesus' Claim of Divinity
Risen Jesus
May 14, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Dale Martin discuss their differing views of Jesus’ claim of divinity. Licona proposes that “it is more proba
What Should I Teach My Students About Worldviews?
What Should I Teach My Students About Worldviews?
#STRask
June 2, 2025
Question about how to go about teaching students about worldviews, what a worldview is, how to identify one, how to show that the Christian worldview
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Three: The Meaning of Miracle Stories
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Three: The Meaning of Miracle Stories
Risen Jesus
June 11, 2025
In this episode, we hear from Dr. Evan Fales as he presents his case against the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection and responds to Dr. Licona’s writi
What Are the Top Five Things to Consider Before Joining a Church?
What Are the Top Five Things to Consider Before Joining a Church?
#STRask
July 3, 2025
Questions about the top five things to consider before joining a church when coming out of the NAR movement, and thoughts regarding a church putting o
Which Books Left a Lasting Impression on You?
Which Books Left a Lasting Impression on You?
#STRask
July 28, 2025
Questions about favorite books that left a lasting impression on Greg and Amy, their response to Christians who warn that all fantasy novels (includin
Do People with Dementia Have Free Will?
Do People with Dementia Have Free Will?
#STRask
June 16, 2025
Question about whether or not people with dementia have free will and are morally responsible for the sins they commit.   * Do people with dementia h
Full Preterism/Dispensationalism: Hermeneutics that Crucified Jesus
Full Preterism/Dispensationalism: Hermeneutics that Crucified Jesus
For The King
June 29, 2025
Full Preterism is heresy and many forms of Dispensationalism is as well. We hope to show why both are insufficient for understanding biblical prophecy
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Two: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Two: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
Risen Jesus
June 4, 2025
The following episode is part two of the debate between atheist philosopher Dr. Evan Fales and Dr. Mike Licona in 2014 at the University of St. Thoman
Michael Egnor and Denyse O'Leary: The Immortal Mind
Michael Egnor and Denyse O'Leary: The Immortal Mind
Knight & Rose Show
May 31, 2025
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose interview Dr. Michael Egnor and Denyse O'Leary about their new book "The Immortal Mind". They discuss how scientific ev
Licona and Martin Talk about the Physical Resurrection of Jesus
Licona and Martin Talk about the Physical Resurrection of Jesus
Risen Jesus
May 21, 2025
In today’s episode, we have a Religion Soup dialogue from Acadia Divinity College between Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Dale Martin on whether Jesus physica
How Is Prophecy About the Messiah Recognized?
How Is Prophecy About the Messiah Recognized?
#STRask
May 19, 2025
Questions about how to recognize prophecies about the Messiah in the Old Testament and whether or not Paul is just making Scripture say what he wants
Is Morality Determined by Society?
Is Morality Determined by Society?
#STRask
June 26, 2025
Questions about how to respond to someone who says morality is determined by society, whether our evolutionary biology causes us to think it’s objecti
If Sin Is a Disease We’re Born with, How Can We Be Guilty When We Sin?
If Sin Is a Disease We’re Born with, How Can We Be Guilty When We Sin?
#STRask
June 19, 2025
Questions about how we can be guilty when we sin if sin is a disease we’re born with, how it can be that we’ll have free will in Heaven but not have t
If Jesus Is God, Why Didn’t He Know the Day of His Return?
If Jesus Is God, Why Didn’t He Know the Day of His Return?
#STRask
June 12, 2025
Questions about why Jesus didn’t know the day of his return if he truly is God, and why it’s important for Jesus to be both fully God and fully man.  
Are Works the Evidence or the Energizer of Faith?
Are Works the Evidence or the Energizer of Faith?
#STRask
June 30, 2025
Questions about whether faith is the evidence or the energizer of faith, and biblical support for the idea that good works are inevitable and always d