OpenTheo

April 8th: Job 6 & 2 Timothy 2

Alastair Roberts
00:00
00:00

April 8th: Job 6 & 2 Timothy 2

April 7, 2021
Alastair Roberts
Alastair Roberts

Job responds to Eliphaz's first speech. If we are faithless, he remains faithful.

Reflections upon the readings from the ACNA Book of Common Prayer (http://bcp2019.anglicanchurch.net/).

If you have enjoyed my output, please tell your friends. If you are interested in supporting my videos and podcasts and my research more generally, please consider supporting my work on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/zugzwanged), using my PayPal account (https://bit.ly/2RLaUcB), or by buying books for my research on Amazon (https://www.amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/ls/36WVSWCK4X33O?ref_=wl_share).

The audio of all of my videos is available on my Soundcloud account: https://soundcloud.com/alastairadversaria. You can also listen to the audio of these episodes on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/alastairs-adversaria/id1416351035?mt=2.

Share

Transcript

Job chapter 6. Then Job answered and said, O that my vexation were weighed, and all my calamity laid in the balances! For then it would be heavier than the sand of the sea. Therefore my words have been rash, for the arrows of the Almighty are in me, my spirit drinks their poison, the terrors of God are arrayed against me. Does the wild donkey bray when he has grass, or the ox low over his fodder? Can that which is tasteless be eaten without salt, or is there any taste in the juice of the mallow? My appetite refuses to touch them, they are as food that is loathsome to me.
O that I might have my request, and that God would fulfil my hope, that it would
please God to crush me, that he would let loose his hand and cut me off! This would be my comfort, I would even exult in pain unsparing, for I have not denied the words of the Holy One. What is my strength, that I should wait, and what is my end, that I should be patient? Is my strength the strength of stones, or is my flesh bronze? Have I any help in me, when resource is driven from me? He who withholds kindness from a friend forsakes the fear of the Almighty. My brothers are treacherous as a torrent bed, as torrential streams that pass away, which are dark with ice, and where the snow hides itself.
When
they melt they disappear, when it is hot they vanish from their place. The caravans turn aside from their course, they go up into the waste and perish. The caravans of Timur look, the travellers of Sheba hope, they are ashamed because they were confident, they come there and are disappointed.
For you have now become nothing, you see my calamity and
are afraid. Have I said, make me a gift, or from your wealth offer a bribe for me, or deliver me from the adversary's hand, or redeem me from the hand of the ruthless? Teach me, and I will be silent. Make me understand how I have gone astray, how forceful are upright words, but what does reproof from you reprove? Do you think that you can reprove words when the speech of a despairing man is wind? You would even cast lots over the fatherless, and bargain over your friend.
But now be pleased to look at me, for I will not lie to your face.
Please turn, let no injustice be done. Turn now, my vindication is at stake.
Is there
any injustice on my tongue? Cannot my palate discern the cause of calamity? There are three cycles of dialogues in the book of Job. They start with Eliphaz go to Bildad and then end with Zophar. Each one of the friend's speeches is punctuated by a response from Job, typically longer than the speech of the friend.
The first speech is by Eliphaz
the Temanite, and that ends at the end of chapter 5. Job's response begins here in chapter 6. He begins his response in a way that probably harkens back to his curse and lament in chapter 3. Comparing his vexational grief to all of the sand of the sea, he tries to explain why he has spoken as he has. Is it at all surprising that a person who has experienced such intense suffering and anguish should speak in such a distressed manner? Surely this is exactly what we would expect from someone in such a position. If only Job's anguish had an objective measurement, it would be amply evident to everyone else too that his response was proportionate.
In verse 4 he speaks to the fact that he has been struck
by the arrows of the Lord. God's poisoned arrows have struck him, and their poison is going through his system. He is also besieged by the terrors of the Lord.
The way that Job
describes his suffering, it seems to be focused more upon the present time, not just the events in the past. His sense of the disloyalty of his friends, and of the cruel injustice of the implicit accusation of Eliphaz's speech, hurts him most painfully, as we shall soon see. Job compares his response to the way that a donkey will bray when he is denied what is fitting to him.
When the donkey has grass he doesn't bray in protest, nor does the ox
low when he receives his expected food. Job has been served a plate of suffering that is utterly unfitting to him, and quite inedible. Is he not permitted to bray in such circumstances? Contrary to the claims of Eliphaz, this is not something that is happening to Job as a result of Job's own sinfulness.
Job has every right to protest. In verse 8 Job finally makes
his own request. Rather than prolonging his meaningless suffering, he wishes that the Lord would simply cut him off.
Why wound him so grievously, yet hold his hand back from
the finishing blow? Does the Lord expect that Job can hold out in this situation? It is not that he is afraid of the pain. Rather he fears that his grip upon his integrity will loosen. His wife has tempted him to curse God and die.
He wants to die in order that
he would not curse God. He does not want to find himself tested beyond his limits, and he feels that he has already reached those limits. What reserves of strength is the Lord expecting him to draw upon at this point? Is he as unyielding as stone or bronze that he should be able to endure such hardship? Every ounce of his strength and resolve seems to have been wrung out of him, and with terror he feels himself approaching the point where his righteousness might also forsake him.
In verse 14 onwards he takes an accusatory
posture towards his friends. The exact sense of verse 14 is difficult to ascertain. What exactly is the relationship that Job is drawing between the fear of the Almighty and kindness shown towards a friend? It is clear enough that he is accusing his friends of disloyalty, and it seems likely that he is associating such loyalty quite closely with the fear of the Almighty.
If they truly feared God, they would not treat their friend in such a treacherous
manner. Job goes on to develop an extended metaphor. He compares his friends to a wadi in the desert.
Such a wadi would bear the torrents of the melt waters as the snows
on the mountains melted, but then having borne those torrents, they would dry up, leaving only dry channels in the summer heat. He imagines a travelling caravan of nomads or traders turning aside to go to the place where they expected to find water, only to find a dry course where they had hoped to find the waters of the wadi. This of course could prove fatal, as they might not be able to get to the next sight of water before dying of thirst.
Job's friends are very similar to this. They are fair weather friends. When he has a desperate need for their aid, they offer no relief.
It isn't that Job has made some unreasonable
demand of them. He hasn't asked for a substantial loan, or for military aid, or for deliverance from some oppressor. Eliphaz, while acknowledging that Job is generally a righteous man, had suggested that Job is suffering because of some fault on his part.
As a sinful human
being dealing with the entirely holy God, there are plenty of grounds for God to inflict such suffering upon Job. It must be justified. Yet Job protests.
He is prepared to listen
if they will only tell him what exactly it is that he has done wrong. A true rebuke would be devastating, but they have offered nothing of the kind. They should pay attention to and reckon with his words, rather than simply dismissing them as hot air.
They are so heartless
that they are like those who would cast lots over an orphan to sell them into slavery. They are treating him and his distress in a very similar manner. They have come in like vultures.
Satan is the great adversary and accuser, but they are proving his willing helpers.
They have failed properly to acknowledge him to this point. They have ignored him.
They
have spent seven days not talking to him. Now, when they have broken their silence, all they have to offer are hard words. They won't actually deal with him as a friend.
Job wants them to look him in the eye, to deal with him candidly and forthrightly. This really matters to him. His vindication is at stake.
If they are going to claim that
he is unjust, make their case. Deal with his arguments. They should not delude themselves in thinking that generalities taken from some school book will suffice to answer his position.
Job insists that he, the sufferer, has some understanding of the nature of his
suffering. Cannot his palate discern the cause of calamity? Why shouldn't they listen to him and deal with his perspective fairly? A question to consider. How does Job's position in verses 8-13 differ from that of a suicidal person? Job is a working farmer who ought to have the first share of the crops.
Think over what I say, for the Lord will give you understanding in everything.
Remember Jesus Christ, risen from the dead, the offspring of David, as preached in my gospel, for which I am suffering, bound with chains as a criminal. But the word of God is not bound.
Therefore I endure everything for the sake of the elect, that they also may
obtain the salvation that is in Christ Jesus, with eternal glory. The saying is trustworthy, for if we have died with him, we will also live with him. If we endure, we will also reign with him.
If we deny him, he also will deny us. If we are faithless, he remains
faithful, for he cannot deny himself. Remind them of these things, and charge them before God not to quarrel about words, which does no good, but only ruins the heroes.
Do your
best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth. But avoid irreverent babble, for it will lead people into more and more ungodliness, and their talk will spread like gangrene. Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus, who have swerved from the truth, saying that the resurrection has already happened.
They are upsetting the faith of some. But God's firm foundation stands, bearing this seal, the Lord knows those who are his, and let everyone who names the name of the Lord depart from iniquity. Now in a great house there are not only vessels of gold and silver, but also of wood and clay, some for honourable use, some for dishonourable.
Therefore if
anyone cleanses himself from what is dishonourable, he will be a vessel for honourable use, set apart as holy, useful to the master of the house, ready for every good work. So flee youthful passions, and pursue righteousness, faith, love and peace, along with those who call on the Lord from a pure heart. Have nothing to do with foolish, ignorant controversies, you know that they breed quarrels.
And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome, but
kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance, leading to a knowledge of the truth, and they may come to their senses, and escape from the snare of the devil, after being captured by him to do his will. From the cautionary examples of those who had abandoned him, and the positive example of Vanessa Forrest and his household, Paul turns to address Timothy more directly.
Relying
upon the empowering grace of Christ, Timothy needs to teach what he has learnt from Paul to others in his turn. Paul's statement in verse 2 should draw our minds back to chapter 1 verses 13 and 14. Follow the pattern of the sound words that you have heard from me, in the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus.
By the Holy Spirit who dwells within us, guard the good deposit
entrusted to you. The deposit that Timothy was told to guard in the preceding chapter is now one that he is instructed to entrust to faithful men, who will be able to teach others in their turn. For Paul it is very important that things get passed on.
The concern here is not one
of apostolic succession, so much as this is a concern of preserving the apostolic faith, maintaining it by a healthy process of tradition, handing it on to a new generation in its turn, to people who are equipped to continue that process. Employing a military metaphor, Paul charges Timothy to courageously face and endure suffering. He is to be a good soldier of Christ Jesus.
We might think here of the language of putting
on the whole armour of God in Ephesians chapter 6. The Christian is a soldier fighting a battle. The stakes are life and death, and loyalty, courage and struggle are non-negotiable. Developing the military metaphor, in verses 4 to 6 Paul gives three different examples of vocations that provide analogies for the Christian faith.
The soldier, the athlete
and the farmer are all different sorts of examples of diligence and hard work in pursuit of a particular goal with the promise of a reward. Paul notes the single-mindedness of the soldier. He does not get entangled in civilian pursuits.
He is there to fight a
battle and to be loyal to his commander. More than anything else he seeks to please the one who enlisted him. In Paul's use of the analogy here, the one who enlisted the Christian is Christ Jesus himself.
Whatever we do we must do in order to please him. Paul also
uses the analogy of the soldier in 1 Corinthians chapter 9 verse 7. Who serves as a soldier at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard without eating any of its fruit? Or who tends a flock without getting some of the milk? The example of the athlete is one that Paul uses later on in that chapter in 1 Corinthians in verses 24 to 25. Do you not know that in a race all the runners run, but only one receives the prize? So run that you may obtain it.
Every athlete exercises self-control in all things. They do it to receive a perishable
wreath, but we an imperishable. The athlete competes and struggles for the sake of a reward.
However to obtain this reward he needs to compete according to the rules. The final example that Paul gives is the hard-working farmer. The soldier is singled out by his aim to please the one who enlisted him, the athlete by his competing according to the rules, and the hard-working farmer by the reward that he receives.
Each of these illustrations allows
Paul to pick out a particular facet of the Christian's vocation. Paul wants Timothy to meditate upon his statements at this point, believing that he will receive greater insight as he does so. Each of the metaphors in question occur on a number of occasions within Paul's writing.
For instance the athletic metaphor can also be seen in Philippians 3, verses
12-14. Not that I have already obtained this, or am already perfect, but I press on to make it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own. Brothers, I do not consider that I have made it my own, but one thing I do, forgetting what lies behind, and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.
Verses 8-10 are a single sentence. Once again Paul's concern
here is that Timothy get his bearings, he needs to remember Jesus Christ, and from taking his bearings by reflecting upon Christ, he will have a clearer idea of how he ought to behave. Jesus Christ is risen from the dead, the offspring of David.
This pairing might
remind us of Romans 1, verses 3-4, concerning his son who was descended from David according to the flesh, and was declared to be the son of God in power according to the spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord. As the one risen from the dead, Jesus has been vindicated, he has been elevated by God, he is the offspring of David, he is the true Messiah. These are absolutely staple truths of Paul's gospel, and he is suffering for this, not just with physical lack, but also with the social shame that comes with being a bound criminal.
Yet Paul's physical condition of imprisonment
could not contrast more with the condition of the word of God. The word of God is not bound, it cannot be shackled, and as a result Paul is confident as he undergoes suffering for the sake of it. In Philippians chapter 1 for instance, Paul can speak of his situation of imprisonment in a manner that expresses his wonder at the way that the Lord has used his situation to advance his own kingdom purposes.
Paul will willingly undergo such suffering
for the sake of the elect. By the elect here he is referring to the church of Jesus Christ. His concern is that the riches of Christ be given to his people, and that his people be led through the trials and struggles of this age, through the shepherding that Paul and others provide, to obtain the fullness of the reward that the Lord has set apart for them.
To underline his point, he refers to a fourfold affirmation. If we have died
with him, we will also live with him. If we endure, we will also reign with him.
If we
deny him, he also will deny us. If we are faithless, he remains faithful, for he cannot deny himself. The first statement concerning dying and then living with Christ might recall Romans chapter 6 verse 8. Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him.
The Christian's identification with Christ and his death, in Romans chapter
6, connected with baptism, is a source of assurance of future resurrection, a truth that will be important in attacking the error that Paul later speaks of. This shouldn't be seen as just a once-off event back in the time of people's baptism. It should be seen as an ongoing participation.
There was a definitive death with Christ, which must continually
be lived out in the believer's life. Likewise, there is an anticipated event of future resurrection, of living with him, but also an ongoing participation in the reality-filled promise and guarantee of that by the Holy Spirit, which has been given to us as a down payment. In the present, we must endure sufferings, confident that if we do so, we will attain what we have been promised.
We will reign with him. We might here recall Paul's charges to Timothy
in verses 3-6. Those who disown Christ will be disowned by Christ.
True disciples must deny themselves
and follow Christ. And as they deny themselves and acknowledge Christ, they will be acknowledged by Christ on the last day, Luke chapter 9 verses 23-26. And he said to all, If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me.
For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will save it. For what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world and loses or forfeits himself? For whoever is ashamed of me and of my words, of him will the Son of Man be ashamed when he comes in his glory, and the glory of the Father and of the holy angels. After the relative symmetry of the first three statements, Paul's fourth statement might surprise us.
There are various ways that people have taken this statement. Some have taken
it as a statement that Christ will save even those who waver in faith. Others that Christ is faithful in his punishing of those who are faithless.
However, I don't think that
Paul is making either of these claims at this point. Rather, his point is that everything is founded ultimately upon the faithfulness of God, not upon the faithfulness of the people of God. Even when human beings prove faithless, God is still going to work out his purposes faithfully.
He will keep his promises. He will uphold his covenant. None of this ultimately
rests upon our faithfulness.
And on the occasions when we have proved faithless, it is to this
faithfulness of God that we should flee. We might think, perhaps, of 1 John 1 verse 9, if we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. It was the faithfulness of God that Moses appealed to in Exodus 32-34 when he interceded for Israel after their sin with the golden calf.
For the Lord to abandon
his faithfulness would be for the Lord to abandon his very nature. He cannot deny himself. This should be the greatest source of comfort for those who are penitent.
Paul is concerned
that Timothy and others around him are able to deal effectively with false teaching in their midst. The false teachers are particularly fond of quarrels. Their teaching leads to conflict and division.
They are unteachable and resist correction. Blind to the true substance of
the faith, they are preoccupied with quarrelling about words, to the detriment of all of their hearers. The way of the false teachers is driven by pride, by desire for the praise of men and for a following around themselves.
Timothy, by contrast, should seek above all
else the praise of the Lord. He should desire to be recognized as a faithful servant, a worker who does not need to be ashamed. And his business is with the word of truth, which he must handle with care.
Discerning true and false words and edifying and unedifying
speech is the business of someone like Timothy. He must be alert to the way that false teachers and their speech impact those who hear them. He must perceive specific types of discourse and the way that they have particular tendencies.
For instance, the irreverent babble of such
as Hymenaeus and Violetus and the way that it can spread through a community like Gangrene. This Hymenaeus is probably referred to in 1 Timothy 1 verses 18-20. This charge I entrust to you, Timothy my child, in accordance with the prophecies previously made about you, that by them you may wage the good warfare, holding faith and a good conscience.
By rejecting this, some have made shipwreck of their faith, among whom are Hymenaeus
and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme. The exact nature of their teaching is not clear. Paul says that they are saying that the resurrection has already happened.
Their over-realised eschatology has been connected
by some to a sort of Gnosticism. As Christians are baptised into Christ, for instance, they obtain the resurrection of Christ here and now. Or perhaps the teaching is based in Christ's own resurrection, believing that Christ's resurrection has precipitated the arrival of the age to come, and we already participate in that.
Or perhaps the teaching is a greatly
over-realised version of something similar to what Paul is teaching. In the life of the church now, we are participating in the resurrection life of Christ. In baptism we were raised with him, and now we are living by the life of the resurrection spirit.
We're not awaiting
some future event, it's already happened. Now of course Paul does teach that we participate in the resurrection spirit, that we have already in some sense been raised with Christ. However Paul has a very strong already-not-yet framework for understanding these things.
We still await
this salvation to be realised in its fullness in the future. There is still a final resurrection, and if we only have hope in this life, we are of all people the most pitiable. All of this is unsettling a number of people within the church, and perhaps Timothy is also somewhat rattled when he sees the apparent success that the false teaching is having in these congregations.
In the face of this widespread faithlessness, Paul wants to remind Timothy
of the Lord's faithfulness. The sure foundation of God is not our faith, but his faithfulness. The language of the foundation might be an allusion back to Isaiah 28.16. Therefore thus says the Lord God, Behold I am the one who has laid as a foundation in Zion a stone, a tested stone, a precious cornerstone of a sure foundation.
Whoever believes will not
be in haste. This verse is read in a messianic way by Jesus and the apostles in the New Testament. Paul here argues that it has a seal, something that validates the one who laid it.
The Lord
knows those who are his, and let everyone who names the name of the Lord depart from iniquity. The Lord is building his house upon this foundation, and this basis remains sure when we see people we once presumed to be Christians who have fallen away, we should not lose our nerve, we should return once more to the foundation and take our bearings from that. The statement the Lord knows those who are his might be an allusion back to a key narrative in Numbers 16.4-5. When Moses heard it he fell on his face, and he said to Korah and all his company, In the morning the Lord will show who is his and who is holy, and will bring him near to him.
The one whom he chooses he will bring near to him. And then
later on in that chapter, in verse 26, And he spoke to the congregation, saying, Depart, please, from the tents of these wicked men, and touch nothing of theirs, lest you be swept away with all their sins. Perhaps in a manner comparable to that of the false teachers here with Hymenaeus and Philetus and others like them, in Numbers Moses and Aaron were challenged by Korah and his company, and the Lord made a great division in his people, destroying Korah and all who were with him.
Recognising the sort of divisions made by the Lord, the
faithful servant of the Lord must be concerned to cleanse himself, so that he will be useful to the Master, ready for every good work. The church here is spoken of as a great house, and perhaps Paul's point is that just as in a great house there are noble vessels that are put up on the shelf and honoured and treated as items of great value, while there are also other vessels that are used for common use that aren't respected at all, and will soon be disposed of as they are broken or used. So the church is a place with a mixed company, with vessels of honour set apart for the Master's special purpose, and then dishonourable vessels like the false teachers that will be discarded with the recycling.
As those within this house, it is imperative that we seek to be members of the former company. We will be members of this group as we cleanse ourselves, and as Paul highlights in verse 22, as we flee youthful passions and pursue righteousness, faith, love and peace. The youthful passions here are probably not primarily sexual passions, more likely it's the passions of pride and anger that animate the false teachers.
The faithful teacher approaches
his task very differently from the false ones. He is irenic, he is not someone who is seeking to cause fights. He is kind and considerate of others, seeking to understand where they are coming from and to speak carefully into their situations.
He is able to teach. He knows
how to instruct and persuade people in a way that they are receptive to. He is patient in enduring evil.
Any leader will face lots of opposition. A good leader will not make
the opposition about him. The good leader can endure unreasonable treatment aimed at himself without being blown off course.
When people attack him, he draws attention to Christ.
He corrects opponents with gentleness. He does not respond in kind to the treatment that he receives.
All of this requires considerable self-mastery. It requires being detached enough
from other people that you are not in constant reactive engagement with them. The good teacher is engaged with people without being constantly entangled and enmeshed with them.
Such a teacher
is the most apt person to lead others to repentance. He is not trying to win a fight. He is not driven by pride and wanting to get one up upon the other person.
Rather he is wanting
to win the person to the truth. And his greatest hope is that the Lord would grant them repentance, that they would come to their senses and that the devil would be thwarted in his plans and robbed of his servants. A question to consider.
What are some of the practices of the faithful
leader that would equip him to behave in the way that Paul describes here?

More on OpenTheo

Is 1 Corinthians 12:3 a Black-and-White Tool for Discernment?
Is 1 Corinthians 12:3 a Black-and-White Tool for Discernment?
#STRask
October 27, 2025
Questions about whether the claim in 1 Corinthians that “no one can say ‘Jesus is Lord’ except in the Holy Spirit” is a black-and-white tool for disce
Did Man Create God? Licona vs Yothment
Did Man Create God? Licona vs Yothment
Risen Jesus
August 6, 2025
This episode is a 2006 debate between Dr. Michael Licona and Steve Yothment, the president of the Atlanta Freethought Society, on whether man created
How Can I Tell My Patients They’re Giving Christianity a Negative Reputation?
How Can I Tell My Patients They’re Giving Christianity a Negative Reputation?
#STRask
August 7, 2025
Questions about whether there’s a gracious way to explain to manipulative and demanding patients that they’re giving Christianity a negative reputatio
The Golden Thread of the Western Tradition with Allen Guelzo
The Golden Thread of the Western Tradition with Allen Guelzo
Life and Books and Everything
October 6, 2025
Dr. Guelzo is back once again for another record setting appearance on LBE. Although he just moved across the country, Allen still made time to talk t
The Historical Perspective vs. The Theological Perspective on the Resurrection: Are Both Valid?
The Historical Perspective vs. The Theological Perspective on the Resurrection: Are Both Valid?
Risen Jesus
October 1, 2025
This episode is a discussion between Dr. Mike Licona and then PhD candidate Laura Robinson on the Capturing Christianity podcast. While both scholars
Is Doing the Right Thing a Sin If You Truly Believe It’s Wrong?
Is Doing the Right Thing a Sin If You Truly Believe It’s Wrong?
#STRask
September 22, 2025
Questions about whether Romans 14:23 means that doing the right thing is a sin if you truly believe it’s wrong, and how to reconcile Hebrews 10:16, wh
Is “God the Father” a Sexist Term That Demeans Women?
Is “God the Father” a Sexist Term That Demeans Women?
#STRask
September 29, 2025
Questions about whether “God the Father” is a sexist term that demeans women in general and mothers in particular, how long Hell has been there, wheth
If We Don’t Need to Learn to Hear God’s Voice, How Do You Explain These Verses?
If We Don’t Need to Learn to Hear God’s Voice, How Do You Explain These Verses?
#STRask
September 11, 2025
Questions about why, if we don’t need to learn to hear God’s voice, there’s a command to earnestly desire the gift of prophecy, why we would need to l
The Historical Reliability of the Gospels: Licona vs. Ehrman - Part 1
The Historical Reliability of the Gospels: Licona vs. Ehrman - Part 1
Risen Jesus
September 3, 2025
In this episode, frequent debate opponents Dr. Michael Licona and Dr. Bart Ehrman face off on the historical reliability of the gospels. Held in 2018
How Can I Improve My Informal Writing?
How Can I Improve My Informal Writing?
#STRask
October 6, 2025
Question about how you can improve your informal writing (e.g., blog posts) when you don’t have access to an editor.   * Do you have any thoughts or
The Boys Are Back in Town with Justin Taylor and Collin Hansen
The Boys Are Back in Town with Justin Taylor and Collin Hansen
Life and Books and Everything
September 1, 2025
It’s been a long time since the last LBE episode—too long some (i.e., our mothers) might say. But after a summer hiatus, the three amigos are back in
Shouldn’t We All Be Harvesters?
Shouldn’t We All Be Harvesters?
#STRask
August 4, 2025
Questions about how to handle objections from Christians who think we should all be harvesters and should not focus on gardening, and whether attendin
Fighting on Different Hills: Licona and Ally on the Resurrection of Jesus - Part 2
Fighting on Different Hills: Licona and Ally on the Resurrection of Jesus - Part 2
Risen Jesus
August 20, 2025
In 2004, Islamic scholar Dr. Shabir Ally and Dr. Mike Licona met at Regent University to debate the physical resurrection of Jesus. Both cases, a live
The Resurrection Standoff: Licona vs. Ehrman on the Unbelievable Podcast
The Resurrection Standoff: Licona vs. Ehrman on the Unbelievable Podcast
Risen Jesus
October 22, 2025
This episode is taken from the Unbelievable podcast with Justin Brierly in 2011 when Dr. Bart Ehrman and Dr. Michael Licona address the question: Is t
How Did a Fisherman Write the Book of Peter?
How Did a Fisherman Write the Book of Peter?
#STRask
September 18, 2025
Questions about how a fisherman could have written the book of Peter, why people say that not mentioning the destruction of the temple indicates an ea