OpenTheo

December 27th: Song of Songs 4 & Luke 22:54-71

Alastair Roberts
00:00
00:00

December 27th: Song of Songs 4 & Luke 22:54-71

December 26, 2021
Alastair Roberts
Alastair Roberts

You have captivated my heart, my sister, my bride! Peter's denial.

My reflections are searchable by Bible chapter here: https://audio.alastairadversaria.com/explore/.

If you are interested in supporting this project, please consider supporting my work on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/zugzwanged), using my PayPal account (https://bit.ly/2RLaUcB), or buying books for my research on Amazon (https://www.amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/ls/36WVSWCK4X33O?ref_=wl_share).

You can also listen to the audio of these episodes on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/alastairs-adversaria/id1416351035?mt=2.

Share

Transcript

Song of Songs, Chapter 4. Behold, you are beautiful, my love, behold, you are beautiful. Your eyes are doves behind your veil. Your hair is like a flock of goats leaping down the slopes of Gilead.
Your teeth are like a flock of shorn ewes that have come up from the washing, all of which bear twins, and not one among them has lost its young. Your lips are like a scarlet thread, and your mouth is lovely. Your cheeks are like halves of a pomegranate behind your veil.
Your neck is like the Tower of David, built in rows of stone. On it hang a thousand shields, all of them shields of warriors. Your two breasts are like two fawns, twins of a gazelle that graze among their lilies.
Until the day breathes and the shadows flee, I will go away to the mountain of Myrrh and the hill of frankincense. You are altogether beautiful, my love. There is no flaw in you.
Come with me from Lebanon, my bride. Come with me from Lebanon. Depart from the peak of Ammanah, from the peak of Sinai and Hermon, from the dens of lions, from the mountains of leopards.
You have captivated my heart, my sister, my bride. You have captivated my heart with one glance of your eyes, with one jewel of your necklace. How beautiful is your love, my sister, my bride! How much better is your love than wine, and the fragrance of your oils than any spice! Your lips drip nectar, my bride.
Honey and milk are under your tongue. The fragrance of your garments is like the fragrance of Lebanon. A garden locked is my sister, my bride, a spring locked, a fountain sealed.
Your shoots are an orchard of pomegranates with all choicest fruits, henna with nard, nard and saffron, calamus and cinnamon, with all trees of frankincense, myrrh and aloes, with all choicest spices, a garden fountain, a well of living water and flowing streams from Lebanon. Awake, O north wind, and come! O south wind, blow upon my garden! Let its spices flow! Let my beloved come to his garden and eat its choicest fruits! Few things are more confusing and amusing to those less familiar with the Song of Songs than the peculiar comparisons that it draws. In the opening verses of chapter 4 alone, eyes are compared to doves, hair to goats leaping down a mountainside, teeth to a flock of shore ewes, and cheeks to pomegranates.
What is the hearer to make of such metaphors? In understanding the imagery of the Song, we shouldn't focus narrowly upon its visual aspects. Some in jest have attempted to draw a single portrait, a composite unifying the many images of the woman's various features, like assembling a photo-fit. Unsurprisingly, the resulting portraits look utterly bizarre and ridiculous.
While there are visual aspects to the imagery of the Song, the imagery does much more than tell us what things look like. The metaphors of the Song aren't merely disposable means by which its author is telling us what the characters look like, the goal being that of giving us a sharper picture of them. Rather, the metaphors themselves have an ecstatic character, their purpose being that of allowing sparks to fly between things that might otherwise seem to have no relation.
They are playful, and even puckish, as if designed to employ another metaphor to stretch the elasticity of reference between the two terms of the metaphor to a point where it is almost on the verge of snapping, and yet holding it there, rather than functioning in a narrow visual fashion. The imagery of the Song tends to conjure up arrays of associations, brought to the mind of the speaker by their beloved. Often there is some visual element which may function as if it were the doorway into a broader room of delightful associations.
That visual element is seldom the focus though. Perhaps the most important thing to recognise is the way that the lovers see all the variegated glory of the creation itself within each other, and by means of such exuberant metaphors their love transfigures the entire world. I have previously commented upon the way that the man and the woman in the act of love can exceed for a brief time their individuality and enjoy some participation in higher and greater realities than themselves.
In comparing themselves and each other to creatures like doves and gazelles, and describing each other using metaphors drawn from gardens, armies, buildings, mountains, pastures, fruits, spices, vineyards, banquets, and the various flora and fauna of the land, the lovers discover something of the wonderful yet mysterious continuity between the beauty and awesomeness of nature and that of the human being. The effect of such metaphors and imagery is often largely cumulative. Taken together they invite us to recognise the mysterious ways in which our existence is in profound continuity and unity with that of the rest of the natural order.
In the awe and delight that the lovers feel in each other's presence and embrace, they enter into a deeper awareness of the joy of creaturehood and perceive the face of creation herself in all of her diverse splendour in the countenance and body of the other. In the contemporary world it is easy to forget the creatureliness, animality, and earthliness of our humanity. We are creatures of technique and control who seek to subdue nature and our bodies to our wills.
Yet our bodies, like the earth, have a mysterious life of their own, a life that often exceeds our understanding but which can come into view in sexual relations. In such a context the fact that our bodies are not just both I and it, internal and external, self and world, subject and object, but a living bridge between all of those terms, can become very apparent. The metaphors then are an essential means by which this truth is expressed and experienced.
The metaphors themselves then are part of the import of the song, helping us as its hearers to recognise truths about ourselves that we as moderns have generally forgotten. They also help us to see the world itself differently, not just as an impersonal realm of generic resources to be extracted and exploited, but as a place bursting with life, wonder and beauty. The creation is a place of delight and play, like a glorious and spirited shared dance in which the entire cosmos and all of its creatures are caught up and into which we are also beckoned.
It is a realm to be understood by analogy and in relation with human beings. We see this in various ways in scripture, for instance when the woman is treated as analogous to the moon and the man to the sun, or in statements that explore analogies between the body and the cosmos, as in Genesis chapter 49 verse 25, Blessings of heaven above, blessings of the deep that crouches beneath, blessings of the breasts and of the womb. There the breasts are associated with the heavens that give rain, and the womb with the mysterious watery deep from which life first arises.
The metaphorical language of the song is fitting to its subject. It playfully marries metaphorical terms and invites us as its hearer to enter a frolicsome yet glorious dance of meaning, to see our own world and each other with eyes renewed and reopened to wonder. It also insinuates a sort of erotic cosmology in which the cosmos and its deepest motions is to be understood less in terms of the dictates of impersonal laws than according to the movements of love and desire.
The song describes the man and the woman with different clusters of imagery. Even though there are points of overlap, the contrasts create differing impressions for the two parties. Cheryl Exum observes, The woman draws on images of hardness and solidity, as well as value to describe the firm muscular body she treasures, rods of gold for his hands, an ivory bar for his torso, marble pillar on gold pedestals for his legs.
The man favours natural imagery and images of tasty delicacies to be consumed to picture her as a bountiful source of erotic pleasures. The man's imagery of the woman is more vivid than hers of him, but hers is more relational than his. The woman is more commonly depicted as within, while the man is without, roaming more freely than she does.
He comes in to her, she goes out to him. Chapter 3 ended with the procession of Solomon's palanquin to the city. Chapter 4 opens with Solomon's description of the woman.
Such a description is called a wasif or a blaison. The lover's description of his beloved moves down her body from her eyes, praising her beauty, describing her features and their effect upon him in a series of powerful images. He begins however with an exclamation, Behold! He is astonished at and arrested by her beauty.
While the wasif of chapter 7 verses 1 to 9 will ascend her body with awestruck gaze, like climbing a tall palm tree, moving from her feet to her hair, here he descends from her eyes to her breasts. Her eyes are like doves, entrancing, lively, free and beautiful, bearing messages of love to him, even while mysteriously nested behind her diaphanous veil. Many of the images are surprisingly particular.
As Exum observes, her hair is not merely likened to a flock of goats, but to goats descending down a mountainside and down the mountainsides of Gilead in particular. To understand the imagery we need to consider images in their totality. Goats descending down the mountainside is an image, among other things, of movement, of flowing larks and wavy hair.
But the image likely invites further comparisons and associations. Gilead has rich and blessed pastureland and is itself a place of remarkable natural beauty. Through this choice of metaphor, the man might be comparing the beauty of the land with the beauty of the woman and associating the blessed places of the land with the blessed places of her.
Verse 2 presents us with an image of the evenness, whiteness and fullness of the woman's smile. But as Exum observes, the image is so elaborated that it soon overshadows its referent. We start off with shorn yews that have come up from the washing.
Then we discover that they all have twins and that none of the yews have miscarried or lost their young. If the point of the metaphor were merely to convey that the woman had a beautiful smile, this would be a rather clumsy way to go about it. This should suggest to us that the sheep aren't just being used to help us to imagine the woman's teeth, but that they are important in their own right.
They strengthen the cumulative effect of the images in connecting the woman with the life and fertility of the land. The colours of the woman's face are striking. Her hair is black, her lips scarlet red, her teeth brilliant white, her cheeks are likened to inviting ripe pomegranate halves behind her veil, her neck is statuesque and is illustrated using a military and architectural image of a tower surrounded by warrior shields.
The warrior shields might suggest that she is wearing a great necklace. The connotations of the images are no less important. The tower is David's in particular, implying that the woman has a regal character and bearing.
This is a woman who is fit to be a queen. The powerful tower surrounded by warrior shields also connotes military might. Later when repeating many of his descriptions of her that he gives here in chapter 6, the parallel passage in the panel structure of the central chapters of the book, the lover will say in verses 4 and 5, You are beautiful as Terza, my love, lovely as Jerusalem, awesome as an army with banners.
Turn away your eyes from me, for they overwhelm me. The lover is conquered by the woman's beauty and the depiction of her neck as a mighty military tower conveys something of her power to overcome him by her glorious appearance. The description of her breasts as two fawns, twins of a gazelle grazing among the lilies, is in keeping with the earlier images of her eyes, hair and teeth, but is nonetheless a strange one.
In chapter 2 verses 16 to 17 the woman said, My beloved is mine, and I am his. He grazes among the lilies. Until the day breathes and the shadows flee, turn, my beloved.
Be like a gazelle or a young stag on cleft mountains. The similarity between the language and imagery there, and that which we find here, the repetition of the expression grazing among the lilies, and the refrain, until the day breathes and the shadows flee, invite us to read them alongside each other. The lilies seem to represent the woman's body as a realm of erotic delights, and given the ancient Near Eastern imagery, something that promises rejuvenation.
The cleft mountains seem to be the same as the mountain of Myr and the hill of Frankincense here, the scented breasts of the woman. In chapter 2 the man was the gazelle, grazing among the lilies. Now the woman's breasts are described as two fawns doing so.
Later the man's lips, which graze among the lilies, are described as lilies themselves. Perhaps we are to see a sort of communication of imagery taking place here. As the lovers delight in each other's bodies, each of them starts to communicate some of their attributes to the parts of the body that most prominently delight in them, or which they especially delight in.
As each lover experiences their body as delighted in by the other, their own body starts to bear lingering traces of the other's desire for them. They experience their body not just as their own, but also that of their lover's. The woman's breasts are no longer just hers, but his, and his lips are hers.
Having described her from her eyes to her breasts, the man declares the unified effect that she has upon him. She is beautiful in every respect, without any flaw. Christians, hearing in this Christ's description of his bride the Church, must learn how to see her likewise, to recognize that, even in the Church's present sin and failure, Christ sees her in terms of what he is producing in her by his grace.
Earthly husbands should also follow the same example in the way that they regard their own wives. Husbands, love your wives as Christ loved the Church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the Church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. Describing the power of her effect upon him, the man connects the woman with the awesome beauty of wild lands in which lions and leopards dwell, and calls her forth to join him from her enchanting yet dangerous places.
He doesn't feel safe or in control around her. Addressing her for the first time as his sister and bride, he confesses that he has been utterly overcome by a single glance of her eyes, by the twinkle of a single jewel of her necklace. More marvellous still is the effect that her love has upon him.
For him, her love exceeds the delight even of the bounty of the land, its wine, spices, nectar, honey, milk, and the fragrances of its forests. The bride is like a new Eden to him, a return to the dawn of the world, an enclosed garden spring with plentiful orchards of fruits and the rich and varied aromas of exotic spices. As a lush pleasure garden, she is locked and sealed, having kept herself and not allowed her vineyard to be spoiled by wild creatures or other invasive parties.
She remains a treasure to be unlocked, a secret to be revealed, a place where the lovers can enjoy exclusive and intimate communion with each other. The connection between the woman and the garden is an important one in biblical symbolism. While the man is formed outside of the garden and prior to its creation, the woman is formed within it, and like the garden, brings forth fruit.
Women are associated with springs, fountains, wells, and other water sources in scripture. The patriarchs typically meet their wives at wells. In Psalm 128 verse 3, the wife is likened to a fruitful vine, and in the song she also compares herself to a vineyard.
She is the one from whom life and fullness will come forth. The man is like the gardener, who must tend to, protect and glorify the garden. In Revelation, when we see the glorious garden city of the New Jerusalem, she is identified as the bride herself.
In verse 16, the final verse of this chapter, we enter the very heart of the song. This verse and the first verse of chapter 5 together mark the center of the structure of the song. The woman here speaks herself for the first time in the chapter.
In a series of imperatives, she calls upon the north and south winds to blow upon her garden, sending forth its spices, and to her lover, describing herself as his garden. She is opening herself up to him, and offering him her choicest fruits, as their love is finally consummated. A question to consider.
Where might we see temple imagery in this chapter? Luke chapter 22 verses 54 to 71 And Peter said, Man, I am not. And after an interval of about an hour, still another insisted, saying, Certainly this man also was with him, for he too is a Galilean. But Peter said, Man, I do not know what you are talking about.
And immediately, while he was still speaking, the rooster crowed. And the Lord turned and looked at Peter. And Peter remembered the saying of the Lord, how he had said to him, Before the rooster crows today, you will deny me three times.
And he went out and wept bitterly. Now the men who were holding Jesus in custody were mocking him as they beat him. They also blindfolded him and kept asking him, Prophesy, who is it that struck you? And they said many other things against him, blaspheming him.
When day came, the assembly of the elders of the people gathered together, both chief priests and scribes. And they led him away to their council. And they said, If you are the Christ, tell us.
But he said to them, If I tell you, you will not believe. And if I ask you, you will not answer. But from now on the Son of Man shall be seated at the right hand of the power of God.
So they all said, Are you the Son of God then? And he said to them, You say that I am. Then they said, What further testimony do we need? We have heard it ourselves from his own lips. Luke chapter 22 ends with Peter's denial and Jesus' trial.
Peter's testing and denial is paralleled with and contrasts with Jesus' trial. This isn't as pronounced in Luke as it is in some of the other Gospels, but it is still present. Both of the two are questioned and one is faithful and the other unfaithful.
And in the story of Peter's testing there is a gradual escalation. First he is challenged by one of the servant girls when he is sitting at the fire in the courtyard and she sees him in its light. She says that he was with Christ, but he denies it.
Later he is accused again, someone claiming that he was one of the followers of Jesus. Finally he is accused one more time by someone claiming that as a Galilean he was with Jesus. Note the way Jesus is seen as an outsider from the north.
He is a Galilean prophet come down to Jerusalem. He is an outsider. Peter denies it even more forcefully still.
He is tempted by the desire to fit in around the fire to avoid ostracisation for the name of Jesus. We can face similar temptations to dissociate ourselves from Christ and his people in order to fit in around the fires of our society, not to be left out in the cold. The cock then crows and Jesus turns and looks at Peter, a detail recorded in this gospel but not others.
Peter then remembers Jesus' saying and the horrified realisation of what he has done hits him. The crowing cock illustrates Peter's own pride, the pride that has now failed at three-fold testing. Whereas Jesus has been sorely tested and succeeded, Peter has miserably failed.
He now completely removes himself and weeps. Jesus' prophecy concerning Peter is fulfilled at the very time that Jesus is marked and beaten as a false prophet. Jesus has also prophetically predicted that he would be marked and insulted in such a manner in chapter 18 verses 32-33.
Perhaps we could see some sort of parallel between Jesus and Samson. Samson is blinded, his eyes are removed and the Philistines make mockery of him. Here Jesus has a blindfold put over him and he is marked.
However just as Samson's greatest victory was won in the hour of his death, so Jesus' greatest victory will be won under similar circumstances. The chief priests and scribes seek to get Jesus to claim to be the Christ, the Son of God, in order to have cause to hand him over to Pilate as a false messiah. The assembly asks him if he is the Christ.
Jesus, we should remember, has been performing messianic style actions for the last few days. He had entered into Jerusalem in the manner of a messiah. His triumphal entry, followed by the action in the temple, pointed towards a particular status that he might be claiming for himself.
Jesus responds to the questioning by declaring the futility of any answer, but identifies himself once more with the Son of Man in Daniel's vision, in Daniel 7 verses 13-14. He also alludes to Psalm 110 verse 1. In time they will have demonstration of Jesus' presence at the right hand of the Father, as he destroys the city and the wicked vinedressers and the rebellious subjects, clearly demonstrating his authority and rule. The assembly declare Jesus to be guilty of blasphemy.
They do not have the jurisdiction to carry out any sentence though, so they must deliver him over to Pilate. This trial was probably not a trial in any fuller sense of the word. It is better thought of as a hearing designed to establish charges to be presented to Pilate, the one with the authority to cast a death sentence.
A question to consider, how might the claim that Jesus is the Christ interplay with his claim to be the Son of Man in a way that fulfils Daniel chapter 7? How might the understanding of Jesus as the Christ and Jesus as the Son of Man fill each other out?

More on OpenTheo

Is It Problematic for a DJ to Play Songs That Are Contrary to His Christian Values?
Is It Problematic for a DJ to Play Songs That Are Contrary to His Christian Values?
#STRask
July 10, 2025
Questions about whether it’s problematic for a DJ on a secular radio station to play songs with lyrics that are contrary to his Christian values, and
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Risen Jesus
May 7, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Bart Ehrman face off for the second time on whether historians can prove the resurrection. Dr. Ehrman says no
Licona and Martin Talk about the Physical Resurrection of Jesus
Licona and Martin Talk about the Physical Resurrection of Jesus
Risen Jesus
May 21, 2025
In today’s episode, we have a Religion Soup dialogue from Acadia Divinity College between Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Dale Martin on whether Jesus physica
God Didn’t Do Anything to Earn Being God, So How Did He Become So Judgmental?
God Didn’t Do Anything to Earn Being God, So How Did He Become So Judgmental?
#STRask
May 15, 2025
Questions about how God became so judgmental if he didn’t do anything to become God, and how we can think the flood really happened if no definition o
Is There a Reference Guide to Teach Me the Vocabulary of Apologetics?
Is There a Reference Guide to Teach Me the Vocabulary of Apologetics?
#STRask
May 1, 2025
Questions about a resource for learning the vocabulary of apologetics, whether to pursue a PhD or another master’s degree, whether to earn a degree in
The Plausibility of Jesus' Rising from the Dead Licona vs. Shapiro
The Plausibility of Jesus' Rising from the Dead Licona vs. Shapiro
Risen Jesus
April 23, 2025
In this episode of the Risen Jesus podcast, we join Dr. Licona at Ohio State University for his 2017 resurrection debate with philosopher Dr. Lawrence
What Would You Say to Someone Who Believes in “Healing Frequencies”?
What Would You Say to Someone Who Believes in “Healing Frequencies”?
#STRask
May 8, 2025
Questions about what to say to someone who believes in “healing frequencies” in fabrics and music, whether Christians should use Oriental medicine tha
What Should I Say to Someone Who Believes Zodiac Signs Determine Personality?
What Should I Say to Someone Who Believes Zodiac Signs Determine Personality?
#STRask
June 5, 2025
Questions about how to respond to a family member who believes Zodiac signs determine personality and what to say to a co-worker who believes aliens c
The Biblical View of Abortion with Tom Pennington
The Biblical View of Abortion with Tom Pennington
Life and Books and Everything
May 5, 2025
What does the Bible say about life in the womb? When does life begin? What about personhood? What has the church taught about abortion over the centur
Bible Study: Choices and Character in James, Part 1
Bible Study: Choices and Character in James, Part 1
Knight & Rose Show
June 21, 2025
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose explore chapters 1 and 2 of the Book of James. They discuss the book's author, James, the brother of Jesus, and his mar
Nicene Orthodoxy with Blair Smith
Nicene Orthodoxy with Blair Smith
Life and Books and Everything
April 28, 2025
Kevin welcomes his good friend—neighbor, church colleague, and seminary colleague (soon to be boss!)—Blair Smith to the podcast. As a systematic theol
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part One: Can Historians Investigate Miracle Claims?
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part One: Can Historians Investigate Miracle Claims?
Risen Jesus
May 28, 2025
In this episode, we join a 2014 debate between Dr. Mike Licona and atheist philosopher Dr. Evan Fales on whether Jesus rose from the dead. In this fir
What Would You Say to an Atheist Who Claims to Lack a Worldview?
What Would You Say to an Atheist Who Claims to Lack a Worldview?
#STRask
July 17, 2025
Questions about how to handle a conversation with an atheist who claims to lack a worldview, and how to respond to someone who accuses you of being “s
More on the Midwest and Midlife with Kevin, Collin, and Justin
More on the Midwest and Midlife with Kevin, Collin, and Justin
Life and Books and Everything
May 19, 2025
The triumvirate comes back together to wrap up another season of LBE. Along with the obligatory sports chatter, the three guys talk at length about th
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Four: Licona Responds and Q&A
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Four: Licona Responds and Q&A
Risen Jesus
June 18, 2025
Today is the final episode in our four-part series covering the 2014 debate between Dr. Michael Licona and Dr. Evan Fales. In this hour-long episode,