OpenTheo

August 21st: Amos 2 & John 17

Alastair Roberts
00:00
00:00

August 21st: Amos 2 & John 17

August 20, 2021
Alastair Roberts
Alastair Roberts

Oracles against Moab, Judah, and Israel. Jesus' high priestly prayer.

Reflections upon the readings from the ACNA Book of Common Prayer (http://bcp2019.anglicanchurch.net/). My reflections are searchable by Bible chapter here: https://audio.alastairadversaria.com/explore/.

If you have enjoyed my output, please tell your friends. If you are interested in supporting my videos and podcasts and my research more generally, please consider supporting my work on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/zugzwanged), using my PayPal account (https://bit.ly/2RLaUcB), or by buying books for my research on Amazon (https://www.amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/ls/36WVSWCK4X33O?ref_=wl_share).

The audio of all of my videos is available on my Soundcloud account: https://soundcloud.com/alastairadversaria. You can also listen to the audio of these episodes on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/alastairs-adversaria/id1416351035?mt=2.

Share

Transcript

Amos chapter 2. Thus says the Lord, For three transgressions of Moab, and for four, I will not revoke the punishment, because he burned to lime the bones of the king of Edom. So I will send a fire upon Moab, and it shall devour the strongholds of Kiriath. And Moab shall die amid uproar, amid shouting, and the sound of the trumpet.
I will cut off the ruler from its midst, and will kill all its princes
with him, says the Lord. Thus says the Lord, For three transgressions of Judah, and for four, I will not revoke the punishment, because they have rejected the law of the Lord, and have not kept his statutes. But their lies have led them astray, those after which their fathers walked.
So I will send a fire upon Judah,
and it shall devour the strongholds of Jerusalem. Thus says the Lord, For three transgressions of Israel, and for four, I will not revoke the punishment, because they sell the righteous for silver, and the needy for a pair of sandals, those who trample the head of the poor into the dust of the earth, and turn aside the way of the afflicted. A man and his father go in to the same girl, so that my holy name is profaned.
They lay themselves down
beside every altar, on garments taken in pledge, and in the house of their God, they drink the wine of those who have been fined. Yet it was I who destroyed the Amorite before them, whose height was like the height of the cedars, and who was as strong as the oaks. I destroyed his fruit above, and his roots beneath.
Also it was I who brought you up out of the land of Egypt, and led you forty
years in the wilderness, to possess the land of the Amorite. And I raised up some of your sons for prophets, and some of your young men for Nazarites. Is it not indeed so, O people of Israel? declared the Lord.
But you made the Nazarites drink wine, and commanded the prophets,
saying, You shall not prophesy. Behold, I will press you down in your place, as a cart full of sheaves presses down. Flight shall perish from the swift, and the strong shall not retain his strength, nor shall the mighty save his life.
He who handles the bow shall not stand, and he who is swift of
foot shall not save himself, nor shall he who rides the horse save his life. And he who is stout of heart among the mighty shall flee away naked in that day, declares the Lord. The Book of Amos opened with a series of oracles against the nations, which continue in chapter 2. The oracles began in the north east, with Damascus and the Syrians, moved south west to Gaza and the up to the Phoenicians entire in the north west, then to the Edomites in the south, and the Ammonites in the east.
The next in the series is Moab, which was to the east of the Dead Sea. Its southern
boundary was the Zered River, but the northern boundaries of the nation varied significantly. At certain times in its history, its territory extended into land that at other times belonged to the Transjordanian tribes of Reuben and Gad.
Israel had first entered into the promised land
via the plains of Moab, opposite Jericho and north of the Dead Sea. The Moabite king Balak had sought Balaam the mercenary prophet to curse Israel when they had first entered the land. Naomi and the Limelech had gone to Moab to seek bread, and their son Malon had married Ruth, who later returned to Israel with her mother-in-law after their husbands' deaths.
Israel had also fought against the Moabites at various points in their history. For instance, in 2 Kings chapter 3, Jehoshaphat and Jehoram had joined forces with the king of Edom to fight Mesha and the Moabites. The sin for which Moab was condemned was their desecration of the bones of a king of Edom.
As Daniel Carroll notes, it isn't clear whether they had burned his bones to
lime, or for the purpose of lime. In the former case, they might have been thoroughly burned in order to disrupt the king's passage to the afterlife. In the latter, the purpose might have been thoroughly to defile his remains, employing them as material for plaster.
Following the
pattern of the oracles against the nations to this point, the Lord declares that he will send a fire upon Moab and devour their strongholds. We should probably not see the reference to this particular sin as suggesting that the judgement of Moab is exclusively on its account. Rather, such an abomination, like the Ammonites tearing open pregnant women, is a high-water mark, an especially egregious sin that typifies the character of the nation that has committed it.
Moab was reduced to
a vassal kingdom of the Assyrians later that century, and then overcome by the Babylonians in the 6th century. Amos was a man of Judah, from the town of Tekoa ten miles south of Jerusalem. His prophecy had begun with the Lord's voice roaring from Zion and speaking from Jerusalem.
However, the cycle of judgement that he had been given to declare included Judah as one of its recipients. Judah's specific sin concerned their rejection of the law of the Lord and his statutes, in contrast to the surrounding nations who had, in their cruelty and dehumanising practices, violated the natural law common to all men. Judah had the special privilege of revelation of the divine will and the law given through Moses.
This, however, entailed a greater level of culpability
for its offences. They are held accountable to a higher standard. They had followed lies, presumably the words of false and flattering prophets, a matter in which they followed in the footsteps of their unfaithful ancestors.
Judah would suffer the same judgement as the other
nations. The Lord would send a fire against it, and its strongholds would be devoured. The series of oracles concludes and climaxes with the oracle against Israel in verses 6-16.
The 4-3 transgressions and 4-4 suggest an X, X plus 1 pattern that might even be operating on the larger level of the oracles themselves. With oracles delivered to seven nations, we might think that the sequence was complete, but Israel is then added as the eighth. Carol questions a common reading, which suggests that, leaving Israel to last, the Lord springs a surprise upon his people, who would merely have expected condemnations of the surrounding nations.
Rather, he argues,
this is finally the conclusion of the suspense that has been building to this point. Israel knew that judgement was coming for it, and perhaps in this litany of judgements against its neighbours, it recognised many of its own sins. Considering, however, the extent of flattering false prophecy at this time, perhaps there was an element of surprise here.
While typical oracles of judgement
may have been connected with holy war, and would not very strongly condemn the sins of the prophet's own people, the genuine word of the Lord is one that challenges his own people's sins. The judgement upon Israel is by far the longest to this point, underlining the fact that it is set apart from other nations, as they are the people of the Lord. The nature of their crimes is difficult to determine in certain cases.
Selling the righteous for silver and the needy for a pair of sandals might be a
matter of the injustice of the courts, within which even the smallest of bribes could pervert the justice due to the destitute. Alternatively, it might refer to the utter lack of mercy in an oppressive society, where the smallest debt, even of a mere pair of sandals, could end up with someone being sold into slavery. The poor trait of Israelite society given in these verses is one of cruel greed, oppression and injustice.
Several parts of the law instructed Israel concerning ongoing provision
and care for the poor. Such provision was supposed to be built into many of its practices, institutions and customs. Likewise, the danger of bribery perverting judgement concerning the poor was an issue that was highlighted at many points in the law and the wisdom literature.
Beyond such economic
and legal injustice, Israel was a place of sexual immorality, with violations of the laws of consanguinity in incestuous sexual relations. Others believed that a cult prostitute might be in view in the condemnation here. Such abominations defiled the people and the land, and led to the name of the Lord being profaned among his people and the surrounding nations.
Verse 8 might refer to
seemingly common practices whereby property confiscated from debtors or taxed by corrupt officials became means of decadent behaviour. Perhaps what is in view here is an exacerbation of injustice and oppression by using the expropriated property of poor debtors for decadent excess in the presence of the Lord. We might think of Deuteronomy chapter 23 verse 18 here.
You shall not bring the fee of a prostitute or the wages of a dog into the house of the Lord in payment for any vow, for both of these are an abomination to the Lord your God. The fee of a prostitute was bad enough, but to bring such a thing before the Lord as an offering compounded the offence. Perhaps a similar point is being made here about money and property gained through oppression and injustice.
In verses 9-12
the Lord recalls his great deeds for his people Israel in the past. He had uprooted the Amorites and the Canaanites from the land, defeating the giants, and giving the people a possession in the land despite the greatness and the strength of their adversaries. He had delivered his people from Egypt in the Exodus, and he had guided them through the wilderness to the promised land.
The Lord had raised up members of the people who were his dedicated servants, Nazarites who had taken the vow of Numbers chapter 6, and prophets with a divine commission. The Israelites however had sought to pervert and undermine the vocations of these persons, seeking to defile them, getting the Nazarites to break their vow by drinking wine, and shutting up the prophets who had been given the word of the Lord to proclaim. The sentence upon this wicked nation is declared in verses 13-16.
It differs from the typical form of the sentences that preceded it. The Israelites would be pressed or weighed down so that they could not freely move. The fastest, strongest, mightiest, most skilled, and the bravest among them would all be utterly humiliated.
None of their might or courage would
be sufficient to save them in that day, nor would the strength of weapon or beast. They are condemned to shameful and utter defeat. A question to consider, where else can we get a characterization of the national life of Israel at this juncture in their history? John chapter 17.
When Jesus had
spoken these words, he lifted up his eyes to heaven and said, Father, the hour has come. Glorify your Son, that the Son may glorify you, since you have given him authority over all flesh to give eternal life to all whom you have given him. And this is eternal life, that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent.
I glorified you on earth, having accomplished
the work that you gave me to do. And now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed. I have manifested your name to the people whom you gave me out of the world.
Yours they were, and you gave them to me, and they have kept your word.
Now they know that everything that you have given me is from you, for I have given them the words that you gave me, and they have received them and have come to know in truth that I came from you, and they have believed that you sent me. I am praying for them.
I am not praying for the world,
but for those whom you have given me, for they are yours. All mine are yours, and yours are mine, and I am glorified in them. And I am no longer in the world, but they are in the world, and I am coming to you.
Holy Father, keep them in your name, which you have given me,
that they may be one, even as we are one. While I was with them, I kept them in your name, which you have given me. I have guarded them, and not one of them has been lost except the son of destruction, that the scripture might be fulfilled.
But now I am coming to you,
and these things I speak in the world, that they may have my joy fulfilled in themselves. I have given them your word, and the world has hated them, because they are not of the world, just as I am not of the world. I do not ask that you take them out of the world, but that you keep them from the evil one.
They are not of the world, just as I am not of the world.
Sanctify them in the truth. Your word is truth.
As you sent me into the world, so I have sent
them into the world, and for their sake I consecrate myself, that they also may be sanctified in truth. I do not ask for these only, but also for those who will believe in me through their word, that they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me. The glory that you have given me, I have given to them, that they may be one, even as we are one, I in them, and you in me, that they may become perfectly one, so that the world may know that you sent me, and love them, even as you love me.
Father, I desire that they also, whom you have given me, may be with me where
I am, to see my glory that you have given me, because you loved me before the foundation of the world. O righteous Father, even though the world does not know you, I know you, and these know that you have sent me. I made known to them your name, and I will continue to make it known, that the love with which you have loved me may be in them, and I in them.
John chapter 17, commonly called the High Priestly Prayer of Christ, is perhaps one of the most moving and powerful passages in all of scripture. Within it the son addresses his father, speaking of his relationship with his people as something that is implicated in his loving bond with the father. Behind John chapter 17 we might see passages such as the relationship between the Son of Man and the Ancient of Days in Daniel chapter 7 verses 13 to 14.
There has already
been anticipation of this great prayer earlier in the gospel, in chapter 11 verses 41 to 42, in chapter 12 verses 27 to 28. It's also reminiscent of the beginning of chapter 13, where Jesus first addresses himself to his disciples in that context. Jesus, realising that his hour had come, that he was about to go to the father, that everything was about to be fulfilled, took up the cloth and started wiping his disciples' feet.
There we had the beginning of the
conversation with his disciples in the farewell discourse. The passage here is introduced with a similar set of statements. Jesus recognises that his hour has come, and he speaks to his father concerning it.
Perhaps we should see something of the two-fold aspect of the cross. First of all,
there's an action directed to the disciples in washing their feet, laying aside his garments and serving and ministering to them, but also addressing himself to his father. The event of the cross is an event of glorification.
It's an event in which he's going to be lifted up or
elevated by the father. He's going to ascend to his father following it. Both aspects of the cross can be seen in chapters 13 to 17.
While we saw the first part of that more clearly in chapter 13,
now we see in the Son's addressing of himself to the father, the lifting up of Jesus to God's presence, coming to the foreground. We might also see this prayer as one that has many parallels with the Lord's Prayer. Our Father who art in heaven, Jesus lifts up his eyes to heaven and says, Father, hallowed be your name.
Glorify your Son so that your Son may glorify you. Your kingdom
come. I glorified you on earth, having accomplished the work that you gave me to do.
And now, Father,
glorify me in your presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed. On earth, as it is in heaven, the petition deliver us from evil also parallels with Christ's prayer that his disciples would be preserved from the evil one. There are a lot of other parallels that we can see if we look deeper.
What's the point of these parallels? I think that through them we can
recognize the way that, first of all, our prayers resemble, participate, correspond with, and function within the prayer of Jesus for us. Jesus is here interceding for his flock and Jesus' relationship with his Father as the Son is one in which we participate in. The love with which the Father loves the Son is the love with which he loves us in his Son.
We can speak to the Father in the name
of Jesus and thereby enjoy access that he enjoys. In addition to such participation, we can see the way that Jesus himself is praying for the fulfillment of his own kingdom. As we pray for this, as his people on earth, he's praying for it in heaven.
Our prayers are accompanied by Christ's
prayers for us and for his kingdom in heaven. When we pursue the kingdom of God, we're not pursuing it alone. We're joined with the prayer of Jesus to the Father.
And so when we pray in
Jesus' name, it's not just that we're having access in his name, we're joining our prayers with his. Once again, Jesus refers to his coming death, not just to the resurrection and the ascension to follow it, as a glorification that he will be glorified in. He speaks of being given authority over all for the sake of his people.
Often when we think of the authority of Jesus,
we think about the authority of Jesus with relationship to his people as an authority that he exercises purely over us. Jesus tells us what to do and we obey. However, here Jesus speaks of being given authority over all so that he might give eternal life to all who have been given to him.
That authority has been given to him and is exercised for our sake in order that we might
come to participate in eternal life. Jesus describes this life as knowing the true God and Jesus, the Christ that he has sent. These two things are directly connected.
We know the revealed
Father in the revealing Son and knowing God is to know God in the Messiah, Jesus. To know the Son is to know the Father, as Jesus has spoken about earlier in his conversation with Thomas. This passage stresses that the disciples are given to him by the Father.
The church is a gift of love
from the Father to the Son in the Spirit and as such we are implicated in the bond of love of the Trinity itself. The disciples have kept God's word. They have arrived at a true knowledge of Jesus and his mission.
They know that he has been sent by God. Throughout the Gospel of John this has been
a recurring theme. Where does Jesus come from? From where and from whom has he been sent? The Jewish authorities and most of the people fail to recognize Christ's origins.
However, the disciples have seen
them and with this knowledge they've arrived at the point where they can move forward. This is a source of joy for Jesus at this time for his glorification has now arrived because his mission has been realized in the fact that these disciples now recognize the truth of his origin. Jesus proceeds to speak of the intimate relationship between his possession and the Father's possession.
What's the Son's is the Father's and what belongs to the Father is the Son's. There could not be a closer relationship between the two. We need to read this against the background of the Old Testament where God declares forcefully in places like Isaiah that he will not give his glory to another, that his name is above all other names and that in his name every knee will bow, every tongue will confess.
This however is the name that the Son enjoys. This is the glory that is given to him
and so the way that Jesus speaks of himself here is a claim to deity. It's very clearly filling out the picture that we found elsewhere in the Gospel where Jesus is identified with the Father in a way that's closer than just one that is sent on a very important or central mission.
Jesus and the Father
are one. Jesus declares here that he is no longer in the world, he is on the way out of the world, he's going to the Father and yet his disciples will be left in the world. While he was in the world he protected his disciples, guarding them from the evil one by his teaching and his practice and his presence.
Only Judas fell away but did so in fulfillment of scripture. Note the reference to
the Son of Perdition here. It's found also elsewhere in scripture in 2 Thessalonians 2 verse 3. It seems to be an eschatological figure that is anticipated and fulfilled both in Christ's immediate mission but then also in the events running up to 70 AD.
Perhaps what we see here
is an example of a pattern played out in history that plays out on a number of occasions. There will be Judas characters later on in the story, later on in the run up to AD 70 and then maybe also later on in the run up to the final coming of Christ. The disciples remain in the world but they're not rooted in the world.
That's no longer the site that they find their foundation
and their truest belonging. They are hated by the world like Jesus was because they are not of it. They have been sent into the world by him.
Jesus sanctifies himself for us by going to the cross
and he does so in order that we might be sanctified by God's truth. He prays not just for his immediate disciples but for all who will believe through their testimony. This prayer extends not just to the immediate 12 apostles but extends to us as well, to those who have believed through the apostolic testimony.
At later points in John's Gospel we'll see also that the Gospel writer
turns to us and looks us in the eye telling us that these things were written so that we might believe. Jesus' words here in the Gospel are spoken concerning us. We should recognize ourselves within them.
Jesus prayed that his disciples and the ones who believe through their word would be
one. This is not primarily about ecumenism and about a unified church and visible institutions. It's primarily about the shared roots of our union with God and our shared union with and in God is the basis of our union with each other.
It's important to get the order right here. We look to
God for our union by faith not primarily to a more visible church union on earth. However as our union with the Father and the Son and the Spirit and with each other in the triune God is made manifest, people will believe that Jesus was sent by the Father.
So the unity of the church is important
but that visible unity must be grounded in the deeper unity, the unity that we have in the triune God. That is the true unity that Christ prays for here. Jesus gives the glory and the love that the Father gives and shares with him to his disciples.
It seems to me that this is likely a reference to
the Spirit. The gift of the Spirit is the gift of the union of love and the glory of the triune God to his people. Through the gift of the Spirit it's made possible for us to enjoy the glory and the love with which the Father loved the Son before the foundation of the world.
A question to consider,
in this chapter there are a great many references to the Father and the Son and the way that they secure our redemption through their united work. I believe that we can also hear some allusions to the work of the Spirit which I've already mentioned. Putting the various parts of this picture together what are the ways in which each person of the Trinity is involved in a united work constituting the church as the people of God within the witness of this chapter?

More on OpenTheo

Bible Study: Choices and Character in James, Part 1
Bible Study: Choices and Character in James, Part 1
Knight & Rose Show
June 21, 2025
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose explore chapters 1 and 2 of the Book of James. They discuss the book's author, James, the brother of Jesus, and his mar
What Evidence Can I Give for Objective Morality?
What Evidence Can I Give for Objective Morality?
#STRask
June 23, 2025
Questions about how to respond to someone who’s asking for evidence for objective morality, what to say to atheists who counter the moral argument for
More on the Midwest and Midlife with Kevin, Collin, and Justin
More on the Midwest and Midlife with Kevin, Collin, and Justin
Life and Books and Everything
May 19, 2025
The triumvirate comes back together to wrap up another season of LBE. Along with the obligatory sports chatter, the three guys talk at length about th
The Resurrection: A Matter of History or Faith? Licona and Pagels on the Ron Isana Show
The Resurrection: A Matter of History or Faith? Licona and Pagels on the Ron Isana Show
Risen Jesus
July 2, 2025
In this episode, we have a 2005 appearance of Dr. Mike Licona on the Ron Isana Show, where he defends the historicity of the bodily resurrection of Je
The Plausibility of Jesus' Rising from the Dead Licona vs. Shapiro
The Plausibility of Jesus' Rising from the Dead Licona vs. Shapiro
Risen Jesus
April 23, 2025
In this episode of the Risen Jesus podcast, we join Dr. Licona at Ohio State University for his 2017 resurrection debate with philosopher Dr. Lawrence
Sean McDowell: The Fate of the Apostles
Sean McDowell: The Fate of the Apostles
Knight & Rose Show
May 10, 2025
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose welcome Dr. Sean McDowell to discuss the fate of the twelve Apostles, as well as Paul and James the brother of Jesus. M
Can You Really Say Evil Is Just a Privation of Good?
Can You Really Say Evil Is Just a Privation of Good?
#STRask
April 21, 2025
Questions about whether one can legitimately say evil is a privation of good, how the Bible can say sin and death entered the world at the fall if ang
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Risen Jesus
May 7, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Bart Ehrman face off for the second time on whether historians can prove the resurrection. Dr. Ehrman says no
Is Morality Determined by Society?
Is Morality Determined by Society?
#STRask
June 26, 2025
Questions about how to respond to someone who says morality is determined by society, whether our evolutionary biology causes us to think it’s objecti
Is It Okay to Ask God for the Repentance of Someone Who Has Passed Away?
Is It Okay to Ask God for the Repentance of Someone Who Has Passed Away?
#STRask
April 24, 2025
Questions about asking God for the repentance of someone who has passed away, how to respond to a request to pray for a deceased person, reconciling H
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Two: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Two: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
Risen Jesus
June 4, 2025
The following episode is part two of the debate between atheist philosopher Dr. Evan Fales and Dr. Mike Licona in 2014 at the University of St. Thoman
Bodily Resurrection vs Consensual Realities: A Licona Craffert Debate
Bodily Resurrection vs Consensual Realities: A Licona Craffert Debate
Risen Jesus
June 25, 2025
In today’s episode, Dr. Mike Licona debates Dr. Pieter Craffert at the University of Johannesburg. While Dr. Licona provides a positive case for the b
Full Preterism/Dispensationalism: Hermeneutics that Crucified Jesus
Full Preterism/Dispensationalism: Hermeneutics that Crucified Jesus
For The King
June 29, 2025
Full Preterism is heresy and many forms of Dispensationalism is as well. We hope to show why both are insufficient for understanding biblical prophecy
Mythos or Logos: How Should the Narratives about Jesus' Resurreciton Be Understood? Licona/Craig vs Spangenberg/Wolmarans
Mythos or Logos: How Should the Narratives about Jesus' Resurreciton Be Understood? Licona/Craig vs Spangenberg/Wolmarans
Risen Jesus
April 16, 2025
Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Willian Lane Craig contend that the texts about Jesus’ resurrection were written to teach a physical, historical resurrection
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Three: The Meaning of Miracle Stories
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Three: The Meaning of Miracle Stories
Risen Jesus
June 11, 2025
In this episode, we hear from Dr. Evan Fales as he presents his case against the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection and responds to Dr. Licona’s writi