OpenTheo
00:00
00:00

Judges 17

March 15, 2022
Alastair Roberts
Alastair Roberts

Micah, his mother, and the Levite.

My reflections are searchable by Bible chapter here: https://audio.alastairadversaria.com/explore/.

If you are interested in supporting this project, please consider supporting my work on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/zugzwanged), using my PayPal account (https://bit.ly/2RLaUcB), or buying books for my research on Amazon (https://www.amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/ls/36WVSWCK4X33O?ref_=wl_share).

You can also listen to the audio of these episodes on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/alastairs-adversaria/id1416351035?mt=2.

Share

Transcript

Judges 17. There was a man of the hill country of Ephraim, whose name was Micah. And he said to his mother, The one thousand one hundred pieces of silver that were taken from you, about which you uttered a curse, and also spoke it in my ears.
Behold, the silver is with
me, I took it. And his mother said, Blessed be my son by the Lord. And he restored the one thousand one hundred pieces of silver to his mother.
And his mother said, I dedicate
the silver to the Lord from my hand for my son, to make a carved image and a metal image. Now therefore I will restore it to you. So when he restored the money to his mother, his mother took two hundred pieces of silver and gave it to the silversmith, who made it into a carved image and a metal image.
And it was in the house of Micah. And the man
Micah had a shrine, and he made an ephod and household gods, and ordained one of his sons, who became his priest. In those days there was no king in Israel.
Everyone did what
was right in his own eyes. Now there was a young man of Bethlehem in Judah, of the family of Judah, who was a Levite, and he sojourned there. And the man departed from the town of Bethlehem in Judah to sojourn where he could find a place.
And as he journeyed he
came to the hill country of Ephraim to the house of Micah. And Micah said to him, Where do you come from? And he said to him, I am a Levite of Bethlehem in Judah, and I am going to sojourn where I may find a place. And Micah said to him, Stay with me, and be to me a father and a priest, and I will give you ten pieces of silver a year, and a suit of clothes, and your living.
And the Levite went in. And the Levite was content to dwell with the man.
And the young man became to him like one of his sons.
And Micah ordained the Levite, and
the young man became his priest, and was in the house of Micah. Then Micah said, Now I know that the Lord will prosper me, because I have a Levite as priest. The concluding chapters in the book of Judges are some of the most puzzling and troubling chapters in the whole of the Bible.
While chapters 17 and 18 are not as troubling as
the chapters that follow, they still raise many questions for the reader, not least concerning the reason for the story being included in this particular form. If we pay close attention to the details that we are given later on in chapter 18, the narrative seems to be dischronologized, out of chronological sequence in the events in the book of Judges. If we were going to put it in its proper place, it would be very early on in the book.
Then there is the strangeness of the story. Why the reference to the mother's curse and the very specific sums of money? Why is the story told from the perspective that it is told? Micah doesn't seem to be that important a figure at all. He's not a leader of the people and he's more acted upon than acting.
Why given the specific details that we receive
on some fronts, do we not have details on other fronts, such as the name of the mother? What happens to the money? Only 200 pieces of the silver that are promised seem to be given, leaving us with the question of what happens with the rest. We should also ask how this narrative relates to the narratives around it, to the Samson narratives and also to the story of the Levite and the concubine. We can see many points of contact between the story of chapters 17 and 18 and the chapters that proceed, the story of Samson and Delilah.
Delilah was given five sums of 1,100 pieces of silver, one for each
of the lords of the Philistines. In chapter 18 the Danites come on the scene and in the preceding chapter the story of Samson was a story of a Danite. In chapter 18 the Danite spies come up from their brothers between Zorah and Eshterhal, which is the location where Samson was buried at the end of chapter 16.
Both stories also mention Mahenadan. There
are very few stories of Danites in scripture. There are only two narratives that make a reference to 1,100 pieces of silver.
The twin locations of Zorah and Eshterhal are only
mentioned on a handful of occasions and Mahenadan is only mentioned in the story of Samson and in the story of Micah and the Levite. It seems to me that there is evidence here for some connection between the two stories. As Tammy Schneider notes, some commentators have argued that the mother of Micah is none other than Delilah and Micah had stolen one of the sums of money that was given to her by the Philistine lords.
Such an identification
however would run contrary to details in the text in chapter 18 that would suggest an earlier date for the events of this chapter. Looking closely at the story of chapters 17 and 18 and the story of chapter 19-21 we can also see a number of points of contact. Both of the stories involve a man from the hill country of Ephraim and someone from Bethlehem.
In both
cases one of them is a Levite. There is seemingly a grandson of Moses in one of the stories and a grandson of Aaron in the other. As we will see when we study it, the many numbers of chapters 19-21 also connect with the sum of Micah's mother's money in all sorts of different ways.
Both stories also contain several details
that are reminiscent of the curse upon and the death of Rachel. Tragic events take place near to the site of her death near Bethlehem. There is the pursuit of stolen teraphine.
There is the near death of Benjamin. There is an unwitting curse upon a child concerning a stolen item. There is terroring at the house of the father-in-law.
And just as silver was
prominent in the stories of Rachel's two sons, Joseph being sold for 20 pieces of silver and Benjamin seemingly taking the pieces of silver in his sack and also the silver cup, so silver is prominent in the relationship between the mother and the son here. Both stories also have an emphasis upon the threshold or the doorway. Both stories are also stories of extreme violation of hospitality.
We might also recognise ways in which this
story reminds us of previous stories within the book of Judges. The rash curse of Micah's mother that ends up falling upon her son might remind us of the rash vow of Jephthah which ends up casting him his daughter. Paying attention to all of the strangeness of the narrative then, there seems to be good reason to believe that this is an account that serves a secondary parabolic or allegorical purpose in addition to being a historical record.
We have similar accounts to this in places like 1 Kings chapter 13 with the old
prophet Abethel and the man of God from Judah, a story in which the two figures represent the northern and southern kingdoms respectively. Micah confesses to his mother his theft of the sum of money from her, yet she had declared a curse concerning it and that curse would seem to rest upon him. So in response to his confession, she seeks to reverse the curse.
First of all she declares a blessing upon her son in verse 2 and then as Micah restores the money to her, she seeks to dedicate the money to the Lord for her son in order to avert the curse falling upon him. Yet of the 1,100 pieces of silver, she only takes 200 pieces of silver, gives that to the silversmith and he makes a carved image and a metal image with it. These two images were in the possession of Micah.
For the images Micah built a shrine
and ephod and household gods. He created a false house of gods with an image of the Lord being surrounded by teraphim in a sort of polytheistic pantheon. Judges here returns to its common refrain, in those days there was no king in Israel, everyone did what was right in his own eyes.
This statement seems to come from Deuteronomy
chapter 12 verses 8-9, you shall not do according to all that we are doing here today, everyone doing whatever is right in his own eyes, for you have not as yet come to the rest and to the inheritance that the Lord your God is giving you. The reference there seems to be about the right form of worship of the Lord in a central sanctuary in ways that avoid the sort of idolatry that Micah represents. We might also see in Micah something similar to the story of the golden calf, his silver images play a similar role to the golden calf made by the Israelites in Exodus chapter 32.
In the second half of the chapter a new figure
comes on the scene, a Levite who comes from the region of Bethlehem in Judah. Although not a Judahite he was dwelling in that region, presumably as one ministering to Judahites as a Levite. He wanders away from Judah looking for a new place and as he journeys he comes to the house of Micah in the hill country of Ephraim.
When the Levite makes known his
intention to Micah, Micah invites him to stay with him and to become a father and a priest to him. He will be paid every year with ten pieces of silver, be provided with room and a board and also be given a suit of clothes. The Levite is pleased with this offer and takes him up on it.
Though a young man we are told that the Levite was originally to
become like a father to Micah, the Levites were supposed to be overseers to give direction to the people of Israel. Yet in verse 11 the Levite becomes as one of his sons, Micah ordains him to his office and the young man serves him as his priest. Rather than being a minister of the Lord, the Levite has become a servant of Micah.
There is a sort of serious inversion
that has taken place here. Micah is also confident that since he has this mercenary Levite in his employ, the Levite replacing one of his own sons who he had earlier ordained to the ministry of this sanctuary that he had set up, that the Lord would bless and favour him. Micah, whose name ironically means who is like the Lord, was seemingly unaware of the severity of his idolatry.
At the end of this chapter then we have a false
house of gods that had been set up and also a false priesthood. As the author notes in saying that everyone did what was right in their own eyes at this time, this is representative of the larger spiritual state of the nation. As I noted earlier, the prominence of the relationship between a mother and her son might make us think back to the story of Rachel and her two sons.
In that story in Genesis, the fate of the mother and her two sons was
powerfully shaped by the father's unwitting curse of his daughter concerning the stolen teraphim and the silver for which her sons were nearly taken from her. Genesis chapter 35 begins with burying household gods beneath a tree and then ends with the death of Rachel giving birth to Benjamin. All of this recalls the curse or judgement of Laban in chapter 31, giving the death sentence to the person who stole the teraphim.
Rachel's two sons
also live under the shadow of this death sentence. Camels from Gilead, Rachel having been seated upon a camel at Gilead when she was confronted by her father, come down and take Rachel's oldest son Joseph into Egypt in chapter 37 of Genesis. There there's an allusion to the teraphim in the statement of the father that Joseph is surely torn.
In chapter 44 there's another recollection of this story as Joseph engineers a situation where Benjamin and the brothers are pursued and searching their possessions from the oldest to the youngest as the possessions had been searched in chapter 31 of Genesis. Joseph's men find the silver cup, the instrument of divination, in the possession of Benjamin. Another recollection of the story of Rachel and the stolen teraphim, not least because there's a similar death sentence declared on this occasion.
In the story of Micah and
his mother we might have a recollection of this story from Genesis. Once again a curse hangs over the child and as we see in this story it represents the state of the nation more generally. The sons of Rachel, men of Ephraim such as Micah and also the men of Benjamin in the chapters that follow are also facing a sort of death sentence.
Perhaps beyond the recollection of the story of Genesis there is an anticipation of a story that is yet to come, a story with similar figures but with a very positive outcome in contrast to this one. There another mother from the hill country of Ephraim makes a dedication to the Lord. Hannah dedicates her son Samuel to the Lord and he serves as a Levite in the house of the Lord.
Every year she makes him a new garment and he also wears
an ephod and serves as a son to Eli, one who replaces Eli's unfaithful sons. In many respects we might see this as the reversal of the story of Micah, his mother and the Levite from Bethlehem, while the story of Judges chapter 17 is the story of a woman from Ephraim and her son taking a Levite to serve as a false priest. The story of the opening chapters of 1st Samuel is the story of a woman from Ephraim giving her son to serve as a true priest of the house of the Lord, not of a false house of gods.
A question to consider, the 1,100 pieces of silver might well remind us of the preceding chapter where Samson is betrayed for five such sums of silver. What other associations in scripture do we have with numbers that are related to 1,100, numbers for instance like 11 or 110? Do any of these numbers potentially shed light upon the meaning of the 1,100 pieces of silver?

More on OpenTheo

What Do Statistical Mechanics Have to Say About Jesus' Bodily Resurrection? Licona vs. Cavin - Part 1
What Do Statistical Mechanics Have to Say About Jesus' Bodily Resurrection? Licona vs. Cavin - Part 1
Risen Jesus
July 23, 2025
The following episode is a debate from 2012 at Antioch Church in Temecula, California, between Dr. Licona and philosophy professor Dr. R. Greg Cavin o
The Resurrection: A Matter of History or Faith? Licona and Pagels on the Ron Isana Show
The Resurrection: A Matter of History or Faith? Licona and Pagels on the Ron Isana Show
Risen Jesus
July 2, 2025
In this episode, we have a 2005 appearance of Dr. Mike Licona on the Ron Isana Show, where he defends the historicity of the bodily resurrection of Je
Shouldn’t We All Be Harvesters?
Shouldn’t We All Be Harvesters?
#STRask
August 4, 2025
Questions about how to handle objections from Christians who think we should all be harvesters and should not focus on gardening, and whether attendin
If Sin Is a Disease We’re Born with, How Can We Be Guilty When We Sin?
If Sin Is a Disease We’re Born with, How Can We Be Guilty When We Sin?
#STRask
June 19, 2025
Questions about how we can be guilty when we sin if sin is a disease we’re born with, how it can be that we’ll have free will in Heaven but not have t
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part One: Can Historians Investigate Miracle Claims?
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part One: Can Historians Investigate Miracle Claims?
Risen Jesus
May 28, 2025
In this episode, we join a 2014 debate between Dr. Mike Licona and atheist philosopher Dr. Evan Fales on whether Jesus rose from the dead. In this fir
Is It Problematic for a DJ to Play Songs That Are Contrary to His Christian Values?
Is It Problematic for a DJ to Play Songs That Are Contrary to His Christian Values?
#STRask
July 10, 2025
Questions about whether it’s problematic for a DJ on a secular radio station to play songs with lyrics that are contrary to his Christian values, and
An Ex-Christian Disputes Jesus' Physical Resurrection: Licona vs. Barker - Part 1
An Ex-Christian Disputes Jesus' Physical Resurrection: Licona vs. Barker - Part 1
Risen Jesus
July 9, 2025
In this episode, we have Dr. Mike Licona's first-ever debate. In 2003, Licona sparred with Dan Barker at the University of Wisonsin-Madison. Once a Ch
If Jesus Is God, Why Didn’t He Know the Day of His Return?
If Jesus Is God, Why Didn’t He Know the Day of His Return?
#STRask
June 12, 2025
Questions about why Jesus didn’t know the day of his return if he truly is God, and why it’s important for Jesus to be both fully God and fully man.  
Is Morality Determined by Society?
Is Morality Determined by Society?
#STRask
June 26, 2025
Questions about how to respond to someone who says morality is determined by society, whether our evolutionary biology causes us to think it’s objecti
What Do Statistical Mechanics Have to Say About Jesus' Bodily Resurrection? Licona vs. Cavin - Part 2
What Do Statistical Mechanics Have to Say About Jesus' Bodily Resurrection? Licona vs. Cavin - Part 2
Risen Jesus
July 30, 2025
The following episode is a debate from 2012 at Antioch Church in Temecula, California, between Dr. Licona and philosophy professor Dr. R. Greg Cavin o
Bodily Resurrection vs Consensual Realities: A Licona Craffert Debate
Bodily Resurrection vs Consensual Realities: A Licona Craffert Debate
Risen Jesus
June 25, 2025
In today’s episode, Dr. Mike Licona debates Dr. Pieter Craffert at the University of Johannesburg. While Dr. Licona provides a positive case for the b
Full Preterism/Dispensationalism: Hermeneutics that Crucified Jesus
Full Preterism/Dispensationalism: Hermeneutics that Crucified Jesus
For The King
June 29, 2025
Full Preterism is heresy and many forms of Dispensationalism is as well. We hope to show why both are insufficient for understanding biblical prophecy
No One Wrote About Jesus During His Lifetime
No One Wrote About Jesus During His Lifetime
#STRask
July 14, 2025
Questions about how to respond to the concern that no one wrote about Jesus during his lifetime, why scholars say Jesus was born in AD 5–6 rather than
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Three: The Meaning of Miracle Stories
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Three: The Meaning of Miracle Stories
Risen Jesus
June 11, 2025
In this episode, we hear from Dr. Evan Fales as he presents his case against the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection and responds to Dr. Licona’s writi
Do People with Dementia Have Free Will?
Do People with Dementia Have Free Will?
#STRask
June 16, 2025
Question about whether or not people with dementia have free will and are morally responsible for the sins they commit.   * Do people with dementia h