OpenTheo
00:00
00:00

Liberty, Pandora, and the Serpent

November 11, 2022
Life and Books and Everything
Life and Books and EverythingClearly Reformed

Was America founded on purely Christian principles and ideals? Or, were the founding fathers simply trying to prevent corruption and preserve the sanctity of consciousness?

In this article for WORLD opinions, Kevin discusses three observable pillars that make up the famous and crucial founding principles of America’s heritage.

Share

Transcript

[Music] Greetings and salutations, this is Life and Books and Everything. I'm Kevin DeYoung. Today I'm reading my latest article from World Opinions entitled Liberty, Pandora, and the Serpent.
What undergirds the American experiment?
When James Madison died in 1836, his last testament, written six years earlier, was finally published. The document, only two paragraphs long, was entitled "Advice to My Country." After recounting a lifelong commitment to his country and the cause of its liberty, Madison expressed his deepest conviction, quote, that the union of the states be cherished and perpetuated. Then he offered one final admonition for the country he did so much to create, let the open enemy to it be regarded as a Pandora with her box opened, and the disguised one as the Serpent creeping his deadly wiles into paradise.
Madison's advice is a fitting testament for the architect of the
Constitution and the entire generation of founders because it pulls together seamlessly and subconsciously, the three strands of political thought that shaped America's founding, Lockean liberalism with a reference to the cause of liberty, classic republicanism with a reference to Pandora and ancient mythology, and Protestant Christianity with a reference to the devil's deception in the Garden of Eden. Although the statesmen and thinkers of the revolutionary era disagreed on much, almost all of the founders took these three principles for granted, which explains why men as diverse an outlook as Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, and John Witherspoon could work together in crafting or at least signing the documents that established American independence and the American form of government. Although the three strands can sometimes pull in different directions, each played a crucial role in shaping the American experiment.
Lockean liberalism provided Americans with a basic understanding
of the social contract and with a shared sense that government existed to preserve God-given rights. Classical republicanism provided Americans with the ideals of engaged citizenry and a free people who use their freedom responsibly and for the good of others. Protestant Christianity provided a shared belief in God's existence in his providential ordering of all things in the supreme importance of the Bible and in a basically Calvinist anthropology that saw man as fundamentally flawed but also capable of virtue and improvement.
Even the way America
came to see itself as a country founded upon almost sacred texts requiring reverence and careful examination was a Protestant self-conception. As debates surrounding Christian nationalism continue, both as a critique from the left and as the desired political goal for some on the right, it's important to note that the language is foreign to America's founding. Did committed Christians and Christian principles play a key role in the founding of America? Yes.
Did most of the founders assume that Christianity would have a privileged place
in American life? Undoubtedly. But this is different from suggesting that they set out to form a government ordered toward man's heavenly good, read Christianity. They were too wary of concentrated power to think that government could be trusted with such a lofty goal.
In general, there are two main ways to conceive of the task of government. One
is to ask the question, what is the best we could accomplish as a people and how should government pursue this highest good? The other is to ask the question, what is the worst we might do as a people and how should government be ordered to prevent this evil? The American founding was animated by the second question. Although the founders believed that men were capable of self governance, they also recognized that because of human sin and selfishness, government by men should be fundamentally constrained.
This is why Madison
argued that government as a reflection of human nature, which he says contains a degree of depravity requiring a certain degree of circumspection and distrust. Federalist 55 must not be given unchecked power, Federalist 51, and why Hamilton argued for a government that would offset the natural inclinations of men, Federalist 9. The proper role of government for Madison and Hamilton was not a grand plan of leading man heavenward, but the simpler and more manageable goal of safeguarding our life and liberty and that of our neighbor. In her book, The Roads of Modernity, Gertrude Himmelfarb argues that France, Britain, and America each had their own distinctive enlightenment.
In France, the enlightenment
was about the exaltation of reason. In Britain, the enlightenment was about social virtues. And in America, the enlightenment was chiefly about liberty.
There's a reason the founders
spoke of an empire of liberty and called each other sons of liberty. Their great fear was tyranny and their great aim in ordering a new government was the preservation of freedom. Their emphasis on liberty was not a rejection of Christianity, but based on Christian ideas about the sanctity of the conscience and the corruptibility of too much power in the hands of too few persons.
I appreciate much of what Christian nationalism is against, a naked
public square, anatomistic individualism, and a conception of liberty that must allow for every form of deviance and degeneration. But as an ism, Christian nationalism is bound to fail, the language is too foreign to America's founding documents and founding ideals. Locking liberalism is not the problem.
The problem is when this liberalism exists without
the communal aims of classical republicanism and the theological assumptions of Christianity. The three strands are undoubtedly frayed, but it is up to us to try to tie them back together. That's liberty Pandora and the serpent from my latest article in world opinions.
[Music]
(buzzing)

More From Life and Books and Everything

Life and Ministry with Mark Dever
Life and Ministry with Mark Dever
Life and Books and Everything
November 18, 2022
In this fun, punchy, and (hopefully) edifying conversation, Kevin interviews his good friend, Mark Dever, about his conversion, his ministry on Capito
The Process of Church Disestablishment in America with Jonathan Den Hartog
The Process of Church Disestablishment in America with Jonathan Den Hartog
Life and Books and Everything
November 23, 2022
If you love long words like antidisestablishmentarianism and are looking for a deep dive into history, then this episode is for you. Jonathan is a pro
A People of Public Thanksgiving
A People of Public Thanksgiving
Life and Books and Everything
November 24, 2022
Happy Thanksgiving from Life and Books and Everything! In this episode, Kevin reads from his recent article in WORLD Opinions about the history of an
Positive World, Negative World, and Christian Nationalism with Justin Taylor and Collin Hansen
Positive World, Negative World, and Christian Nationalism with Justin Taylor and Collin Hansen
Life and Books and Everything
November 8, 2022
The three amigos enter into a meandering conversation about Christian Nationalism and try to discern the level of the world’s hostility to the church
A World Awash in Sheer Monkery
A World Awash in Sheer Monkery
Life and Books and Everything
November 2, 2022
Reformation Day may be behind us, but a huge responsibility lies before us. The faith of the Reformation must be kept alive because the ideas Luther c
Does Christianity Transcend All Our Political Disagreements?
Does Christianity Transcend All Our Political Disagreements?
Life and Books and Everything
October 28, 2022
Christians don’t just disagree on political principles or on a number of political conclusions. Christians disagree on how Christianity and politics r
More From "Life and Books and Everything"

More on OpenTheo

Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Three: The Meaning of Miracle Stories
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Three: The Meaning of Miracle Stories
Risen Jesus
June 11, 2025
In this episode, we hear from Dr. Evan Fales as he presents his case against the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection and responds to Dr. Licona’s writi
Is It Problematic for a DJ to Play Songs That Are Contrary to His Christian Values?
Is It Problematic for a DJ to Play Songs That Are Contrary to His Christian Values?
#STRask
July 10, 2025
Questions about whether it’s problematic for a DJ on a secular radio station to play songs with lyrics that are contrary to his Christian values, and
The Resurrection: A Matter of History or Faith? Licona and Pagels on the Ron Isana Show
The Resurrection: A Matter of History or Faith? Licona and Pagels on the Ron Isana Show
Risen Jesus
July 2, 2025
In this episode, we have a 2005 appearance of Dr. Mike Licona on the Ron Isana Show, where he defends the historicity of the bodily resurrection of Je
Nicene Orthodoxy with Blair Smith
Nicene Orthodoxy with Blair Smith
Life and Books and Everything
April 28, 2025
Kevin welcomes his good friend—neighbor, church colleague, and seminary colleague (soon to be boss!)—Blair Smith to the podcast. As a systematic theol
How Do You Know You Have the Right Bible?
How Do You Know You Have the Right Bible?
#STRask
April 14, 2025
Questions about the Catholic Bible versus the Protestant Bible, whether or not the original New Testament manuscripts exist somewhere and how we would
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Two: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Two: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
Risen Jesus
June 4, 2025
The following episode is part two of the debate between atheist philosopher Dr. Evan Fales and Dr. Mike Licona in 2014 at the University of St. Thoman
The Plausibility of Jesus' Rising from the Dead Licona vs. Shapiro
The Plausibility of Jesus' Rising from the Dead Licona vs. Shapiro
Risen Jesus
April 23, 2025
In this episode of the Risen Jesus podcast, we join Dr. Licona at Ohio State University for his 2017 resurrection debate with philosopher Dr. Lawrence
An Ex-Christian Disputes Jesus' Physical Resurrection: Licona vs. Barker - Part 1
An Ex-Christian Disputes Jesus' Physical Resurrection: Licona vs. Barker - Part 1
Risen Jesus
July 9, 2025
In this episode, we have Dr. Mike Licona's first-ever debate. In 2003, Licona sparred with Dan Barker at the University of Wisonsin-Madison. Once a Ch
What Would You Say to Someone Who Believes in “Healing Frequencies”?
What Would You Say to Someone Who Believes in “Healing Frequencies”?
#STRask
May 8, 2025
Questions about what to say to someone who believes in “healing frequencies” in fabrics and music, whether Christians should use Oriental medicine tha
Sean McDowell: The Fate of the Apostles
Sean McDowell: The Fate of the Apostles
Knight & Rose Show
May 10, 2025
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose welcome Dr. Sean McDowell to discuss the fate of the twelve Apostles, as well as Paul and James the brother of Jesus. M
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Risen Jesus
May 7, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Bart Ehrman face off for the second time on whether historians can prove the resurrection. Dr. Ehrman says no
Could Inherently Sinful Humans Have Accurately Recorded the Word of God?
Could Inherently Sinful Humans Have Accurately Recorded the Word of God?
#STRask
July 7, 2025
Questions about whether or not inherently sinful humans could have accurately recorded the Word of God, whether the words about Moses in Acts 7:22 and
What Are the Top Five Things to Consider Before Joining a Church?
What Are the Top Five Things to Consider Before Joining a Church?
#STRask
July 3, 2025
Questions about the top five things to consider before joining a church when coming out of the NAR movement, and thoughts regarding a church putting o
If Sin Is a Disease We’re Born with, How Can We Be Guilty When We Sin?
If Sin Is a Disease We’re Born with, How Can We Be Guilty When We Sin?
#STRask
June 19, 2025
Questions about how we can be guilty when we sin if sin is a disease we’re born with, how it can be that we’ll have free will in Heaven but not have t
No One Wrote About Jesus During His Lifetime
No One Wrote About Jesus During His Lifetime
#STRask
July 14, 2025
Questions about how to respond to the concern that no one wrote about Jesus during his lifetime, why scholars say Jesus was born in AD 5–6 rather than