OpenTheo

November 25th: Psalm 69:1-18 & Acts 21:1-16

Alastair Roberts
00:00
00:00

November 25th: Psalm 69:1-18 & Acts 21:1-16

November 24, 2020
Alastair Roberts
Alastair Roberts

Zeal for your house has consumed me. Warnings of imprisonment at Jerusalem.

Reflections upon the readings from the ACNA Book of Common Prayer (http://bcp2019.anglicanchurch.net/).

If you have enjoyed my output, please tell your friends. If you are interested in supporting my videos and podcasts and my research more generally, please consider supporting my work on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/zugzwanged), using my PayPal account (https://bit.ly/2RLaUcB), or by buying books for my research on Amazon (https://www.amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/ls/36WVSWCK4X33O?ref_=wl_share).

The audio of all of my videos is available on my Soundcloud account: https://soundcloud.com/alastairadversaria. You can also listen to the audio of these episodes on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/alastairs-adversaria/id1416351035?mt=2.

Share

Transcript

Psalm 69 verses 1-18 Verse 1-19 Verse 2-21 Verse 3-4 Verse 4-5 Verse 2-14 Verse 14-30 Verse 15-16 Verse 16-17 Verse 17-18 Verse 19-20 Verse 20-21 The taunts that are cast at him are taunts directed at the Lord himself. They mark him by mocking the God of Israel. As Tanner observes, there is a progression.
Each verse further describes the alienation.
Home, verse 8. Temple, verse 9. Religious ritual, verses 10-11. And the city gate, verse 12.
It has gotten so bad that she is the subject of songs made up by drunken revelers, verse 12. The enemies are in all the spheres of life. There is nowhere to turn for comfort.
Everyone, family, friends, and the community, all have either deserted this one or actively make fun of her. This one's commitment to God has cost everything. Once again, these words are related to Christ in John chapter 2, verses 13-17.
When Jesus purges the temple in that chapter, his disciples recall this particular passage. Reading the plight of the sufferer of these verses should bring to mind several characters from scripture. The suffering servant of Isaiah's prophecy, most notable among them, Jeremiah and Job also.
Like them, he is unjustly accused. He is consumed with concern for the spiritual well-being of the people and the holiness of the Lord's house. But he finds himself increasingly alone and rejected as a result.
He calls to the Lord again to come to his aid, appealing to God's steadfast love and saving faithfulness. God has committed himself to his righteous people by promise. And with the doggedness of his insistent faith, the psalmist draws assurance from this.
In verses 14-15, we might see a return to the themes of verse 2, paralleling the two sections together. Once more, the psalmist describes his situation of sinking in deep mire, surrounding by enemies and rising waters, at the point of being overwhelmed and near to being submerged beyond remembrance. Persistent in his petition, he calls upon the Lord on account of his steadfast love and his abundant mercy.
In the midst of his struggle, it is in the character of the Lord that he finds comfort and assurance. He may not see the Lord's face, but he is nonetheless confident of his favour and goodness. In the words of the great hymn writer, William Cooper, Judge not the Lord by feeble sense, but trust him for his grace.
Behind a frowning providence, he hides a smiling face. A question to consider. In verse 5, the psalmist declares, O God, you know my folly.
The wrongs I have done are not hidden from you.
How can such confession stand alongside confident pleas for deliverance and vindication as a righteous man? How might the psalmist's example inspire us to pray with more confidence, even as flawed and sinful persons, for God to vindicate us against our adversaries? Acts chapter 21, verses 1 to 16 And when we had parted from them and set sail, we came by a straight course to Kos, and the next day to Rhodes, and from there to Ptahra. And having found a ship crossing to Phoenicia, we went aboard and set sail.
When we had come in sight of Cyprus, leaving it on the left, we sailed to Syria and landed at Tyre, for there the ship was to unload its cargo. And having sought out the disciples, we stayed there for seven days. And through the Spirit they were telling Paul not to go on to Jerusalem.
When our days there were ended, we departed and went on our journey, and they all, with wives and children, accompanied us until we were outside the city. And kneeling down on the beach, we prayed and said farewell to one another. Then we went on board the ship, and they returned home.
When we had finished the voyage from Tyre, we arrived at Ptolemaeus, and we greeted the brothers and stayed with them for one day. On the next day we departed and came to Caesarea, and we entered the house of Philip the Evangelist, who was one of the seven, and stayed with him. He had four unmarried daughters, who prophesied.
While we were staying for many days, a prophet named Agabus came down from Judea, and coming to us, he took Paul's belt and bound his own feet and hands and said, Thus says the Holy Spirit, This is how the Jews at Jerusalem will bind the man who owns this belt, and deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles. When we heard this, we and the people there urged him not to go up to Jerusalem. Then Paul answered, What are you doing, weeping and breaking my heart? For I am ready not only to be imprisoned, but even to die in Jerusalem, for the name of the Lord Jesus.
And since he would not be persuaded, we ceased and said, Let the will of the Lord be done. After these days we got ready and went up to Jerusalem. And some of the disciples from Caesarea went with us, bringing us to the house of Nason of Cyprus, an early disciple, with whom we should lodge.
Earlier in chapter 20, Paul had interrupted the return journey to Jerusalem at Miletus to deliver a final charge to the Ephesian elders. Now, after an emotional parting, at the beginning of Acts chapter 21, he rejoins the company on the ship, and they continue their journey. The we section continues here, Luke is present as part of the company, and now they are going to be moving towards Jerusalem together.
There is a detailed itinerary here of their journey, as there was in chapter 20, with each brief stop on the way mentioned. It's perhaps reminiscent of the itinerary that we find on the wilderness wanderings, given in places like Numbers chapter 33 or Deuteronomy chapters 1 to 3. They're moving from the west coast of modern Turkey, round past Korea in the Roman province of Asia, dropping off on the islands of Kos and Rhodes, before landing in Patara in Lycia. At Patara they board another, presumably larger ship, to go beyond the islands and out into the wider Mediterranean, travelling towards Phoenicia.
The distance from Patara to Tyre was about 400 miles, and has been estimated to take about 3 to 5 days of sailing. Their journey seems to be going smoothly, when they arrive in Tyre they have the time to spend a week with the disciples there, presumably they are well on target to be in Jerusalem for Pentecost. The disciples here express concern about the fact that Paul is going to Jerusalem.
It is revealed to them by the Spirit what awaits Paul there, and presumably they infer from that that he should not go. However Paul's journey to Jerusalem is itself by the constraining of the Spirit, as we see in Acts chapter 20 verses 22 to 23. Such sufferings were always essential to Paul's mission, as we see in the instructions given to Ananias in Acts chapter 9 verses 15 to 16.
Paul is being conformed to Christ. In the Gospels, as Jesus had travelled with his disciples towards Jerusalem, he had revealed to them on a number of occasions what awaited him in the city, and they had sought to dissuade him, as they realised what lay ahead. Paul experiences much the same thing.
On the one hand the Spirit has told him that he must go towards these sufferings, he is constrained by the Spirit. On the other hand the Spirit is revealing to the people around him that he is about to go and the fate that awaits him, and in the process the Spirit is actually increasing pressure against him. Now he needs not only to follow the constraining of the Spirit against all the weakness of the flesh within, he also has to follow it against all of the persuasions of his friends without, who have been given part of the picture by the Spirit, but not the full picture.
The Spirit in the process is testing and proving Paul. All of the disciples at Tyre, with their families, go with Paul and his company down to the beach, praying with them before sending them off. They stop off at Ptolemaeus and visit the Christians there for one day, and then on to Caesarea, where they stay with Philip.
Philip the Evangelist was one of the seven who was called back in chapter 6, and it describes him as having four unmarried daughters here who prophesied. Luke might have several reasons for mentioning the daughters at this point. First of all it draws our minds back to Acts chapter 2, verses 17-18, and the prophecy of Joel as it was quoted by the Apostle Peter in his sermon on the day of Pentecost.
And in the last days it shall be, God declares, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh, and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams, even on my male servants and female servants in those days, I will pour out my Spirit, and they shall prophesy. Luke often has male and female pairings. We've seen this at several points in the book of Acts.
We also see the same thing in the book of Luke, for instance with characters like Simeon and Anna. In chapter 2 of his Gospel he describes Anna as a prophetess. These four young girls are not described as prophetesses, but they do prophesy.
Perhaps Luke reserves the terms prophet and prophetess for people who have more established ministries. Whatever is the case, these young women reflect very positively upon their father. A spiritually gifted father has raised spiritually gifted daughters.
And here their activity of prophesying parallels with the character of Agabus, a male prophet who delivers a message concerning Paul. Caesarea is for this company the last stop before Jerusalem. This is the point where Paul faces the crunch moment, the temptation to turn back.
It is a significant point for Luke as well. Spending time like this with Philip and his family would give him an extended period of time to spend in conversation with one of the important sources for his book of Acts. Much of the content of chapters 6-8 of the book would rest upon Philip's testimony.
The prophet Agabus was previously mentioned in chapter 11 verse 28, where he foretold the famine that would come upon the world. Now he performs a prophecy with Paul's belt to symbolise what will happen to him in Jerusalem. In Luke's account here of the prophecy of Agabus, he's drawing attention back to previous events within his Gospel of Luke.
The moment of decision that Paul faces here is being compared to the choice that faced Christ as he moved towards Jerusalem, and then later in the Garden of Gethsemane. Agabus declares this is how the Jews at Jerusalem will bind the man who owns this belt and deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles. This is a somewhat inexact description of what actually happens as the Romans take Paul into custody after their commotion in the Temple.
One could make a case that he's not really delivered into their hands by the Jews. However, although Agabus' statement can be defended in its accuracy, its main effect is to parallel Paul and Christ. We have statements in Luke that are very similar to this concerning Christ.
Luke 18, verses 31-33. And taking the twelve, he said to them, See, we are going up to Jerusalem, and everything that is written about the Son of Man by the prophets will be accomplished. For he will be delivered over to the Gentiles, and will be mocked and shamefully treated and spit upon.
And after flogging him, they will kill him, and on the third day he will rise. The delivering over to the Gentiles will happen in Paul's case as well. When the disciples hear about this, they weep and try to urge Paul not to go to Jerusalem.
Paul begs them not to weep. It will only make his journey harder. He must go to Jerusalem.
He must suffer for the name of Jesus Christ.
He's ready to be imprisoned and even to die. Here Paul takes up the language of the Apostle Peter that was given to us in Luke 22, verses 33.
In contrast to Peter's overconfident and failed commitment, Paul will carry his commitment through. Eventually they resign themselves to Paul's determination. Let the will of the Lord be done.
And this again recalls events from the Gospel of Luke, in Luke chapter 22, verses 41-42. And he withdrew from them about a stone's throw, and knelt down and prayed, saying, Father, if you are willing, remove this cup from me. Nevertheless, not my will, but yours be done.
Paul is facing his Gethsemane moment here, and he faithfully moves on in the steps of his master. Looking at the description of prophecy in this chapter, it's worth reflecting upon the way that prophecy can be incomplete. In chapter 20, verses 22-23, Paul knows that suffering and imprisonment awaits him.
But he does not know exactly how things will play out. Prophecy can be inexact, as we see in chapter 21, verse 11, as Agabus describes the way that Paul will be handed over to the Gentiles. It may also lead to false conclusions, as we see in verse 4 of this chapter, where the disciples infer from the message of the Spirit that Paul is going to face persecutions and imprisonment, that he should not go up to Jerusalem.
This further suggests that prophecy can be conditional. The prophecy declares what will happen if Paul goes to Jerusalem. The prophecy does not declare that Paul going up to Jerusalem and being imprisoned is inevitable.
Paul has a choice. He could turn back at this point. All of this description of prophecy suggests that prophecy needed to be handled with great care.
It would reveal part of the picture, but people could easily be misled concerning it, and follow it in false directions. The prophet also seems to be in danger of giving an interpretative spin upon his prophecy, as we see in the case of those who tried to dissuade Paul from going to Jerusalem, because they mistakenly took the prophecy concerning his imprisonment there to be an indication that he should not go. Even beyond the discernment between true and false prophecy then, prophecy seems to have required considerable amount of wisdom in its handling.
The prophecy that we see in this chapter is limited counsel. It isn't firm, authoritative and infallible direction. Some of the disciples from Caesarea go up with them to Jerusalem.
They bring them to the house of Natan of Cyprus. He's an early disciple. Perhaps as a Jerusalem Christian with connections to Cyprus, he would somehow have had connections with Barnabas.
They all stay with him, and the fact that they're staying with an early Christian in Jerusalem perhaps serves as an indication that he is another important source for Luke's account of the early years in Jerusalem. Someone who had been present for the early years in Jerusalem would be able to fill in many parts of the story that we see in chapters 1-8. A question to consider, where else in the New Testament do we see Paul tested concerning his sufferings in a way that is reminiscent of Christ?

More on OpenTheo

Why Does It Seem Like God Hates Some and Favors Others?
Why Does It Seem Like God Hates Some and Favors Others?
#STRask
April 28, 2025
Questions about whether the fact that some people go through intense difficulties and suffering indicates that God hates some and favors others, and w
What Would Be the Point of Getting Baptized After All This Time?
What Would Be the Point of Getting Baptized After All This Time?
#STRask
May 22, 2025
Questions about the point of getting baptized after being a Christian for over 60 years, the difference between a short prayer and an eloquent one, an
Nicene Orthodoxy with Blair Smith
Nicene Orthodoxy with Blair Smith
Life and Books and Everything
April 28, 2025
Kevin welcomes his good friend—neighbor, church colleague, and seminary colleague (soon to be boss!)—Blair Smith to the podcast. As a systematic theol
Which Books Left a Lasting Impression on You?
Which Books Left a Lasting Impression on You?
#STRask
July 28, 2025
Questions about favorite books that left a lasting impression on Greg and Amy, their response to Christians who warn that all fantasy novels (includin
Why Would We Need to Be in a Fallen World to Fully Know God?
Why Would We Need to Be in a Fallen World to Fully Know God?
#STRask
July 21, 2025
Questions about why, if Adam and Eve were in perfect community with God, we would need to be in a fallen world to fully know God, and why God cursed n
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Risen Jesus
May 7, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Bart Ehrman face off for the second time on whether historians can prove the resurrection. Dr. Ehrman says no
What Evidence Can I Give for Objective Morality?
What Evidence Can I Give for Objective Morality?
#STRask
June 23, 2025
Questions about how to respond to someone who’s asking for evidence for objective morality, what to say to atheists who counter the moral argument for
Bible Study: Choices and Character in James, Part 1
Bible Study: Choices and Character in James, Part 1
Knight & Rose Show
June 21, 2025
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose explore chapters 1 and 2 of the Book of James. They discuss the book's author, James, the brother of Jesus, and his mar
An Ex-Christian Disputes Jesus' Physical Resurrection: Licona vs. Barker - Part 2
An Ex-Christian Disputes Jesus' Physical Resurrection: Licona vs. Barker - Part 2
Risen Jesus
July 16, 2025
In this episode , we have Dr. Mike Licona's first-ever debate. In 2003, Licona sparred with Dan Barker at the University of Wisonsin-Madison. Once a C
Bible Study: Choices and Character in James, Part 2
Bible Study: Choices and Character in James, Part 2
Knight & Rose Show
July 12, 2025
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose study James chapters 3-5, emphasizing taming the tongue and pursuing godly wisdom. They discuss humility, patience, and
Did Matter and Energy Already Exist Before the Big Bang?
Did Matter and Energy Already Exist Before the Big Bang?
#STRask
July 24, 2025
Questions about whether matter and energy already existed before the Big Bang, how to respond to a Christian friend who believes Genesis 1 and Genesis
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Two: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Two: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
Risen Jesus
June 4, 2025
The following episode is part two of the debate between atheist philosopher Dr. Evan Fales and Dr. Mike Licona in 2014 at the University of St. Thoman
Can a Deceased Person’s Soul Live On in the Recipient of His Heart?
Can a Deceased Person’s Soul Live On in the Recipient of His Heart?
#STRask
May 12, 2025
Questions about whether a deceased person’s soul can live on in the recipient of his heart, whether 1 Corinthians 15:44 confirms that babies in the wo
What Should I Say to Someone Who Believes Zodiac Signs Determine Personality?
What Should I Say to Someone Who Believes Zodiac Signs Determine Personality?
#STRask
June 5, 2025
Questions about how to respond to a family member who believes Zodiac signs determine personality and what to say to a co-worker who believes aliens c
Licona and Martin: A Dialogue on Jesus' Claim of Divinity
Licona and Martin: A Dialogue on Jesus' Claim of Divinity
Risen Jesus
May 14, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Dale Martin discuss their differing views of Jesus’ claim of divinity. Licona proposes that “it is more proba