OpenTheo

March 25th: Exodus 32 & Luke 1:26-38

Alastair Roberts
00:00
00:00

March 25th: Exodus 32 & Luke 1:26-38

March 24, 2020
Alastair Roberts
Alastair Roberts

The Golden Calf. The Annunciation.

Some passages referenced:

Exodus 4:16, 7:1 (Moses as God to Aaron and to Pharaoh); Exodus 16:2-12 (Complaining to Moses; God acting to show he is their God); Exodus 20:18-21 (Moses as intermediary); Numbers 16:3, 20:2 (people gathered together in rebellion); Exodus 20:22-26 (command against gods of gold); Genesis 6:5-7, 11-13 (corruption of the earth and God’s desire to destroy it in the days of Noah); Genesis 34:25-29 (Levi’s vengeance).

Daniel 8:16, 9:21 (the Angel Gabriel); Judges 5:24 (the description of Jael); 1 Samuel 2:1-10 (Hannah’s prayer); Exodus 40:34-38 (cloud covering the tent of meeting).

Reflections upon the readings from the ACNA Book of Common Prayer (http://bcp2019.anglicanchurch.net/).

If you have enjoyed my output, please tell your friends. If you are interested in supporting my videos and podcasts and my research more generally, please consider supporting my work on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/zugzwanged), using my PayPal account (https://bit.ly/2RLaUcB), or by buying books for my research on Amazon (https://www.amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/ls/36WVSWCK4X33O?ref_=wl_share).

The audio of all of my videos is available on my Soundcloud account: https://soundcloud.com/alastairadversaria. You can also listen to the audio of these episodes on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/alastairs-adversaria/id1416351035?mt=2.

Share

Transcript

Exodus 32 When the people saw that Moses delayed to come down from the mountain, the people gathered themselves together to Aaron and said to him, Up, make us gods who shall go before us. As for this Moses, the man who brought us out of the land of Egypt, we do not know what has become of him. So Aaron said to them, Take off the rings of gold that are in the ears of your wives, your sons, and your daughters, and bring them to me.
So all the people took off the rings of gold that were in their ears and brought them to Aaron, and he received the gold from their hand and fashioned it with a graving tool and made a golden calf. And they said, These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt. When Aaron saw this, he built an altar before it, and Aaron made a proclamation and said, Tomorrow shall be a feast to the Lord.
And they rose up early the next day and offered burnt offerings and brought peace offerings. And the people sat down to eat and drink and rose up to play. And the Lord said to Moses, Go down, for your people, whom you brought up out of the land of Egypt, have corrupted themselves.
They have turned aside quickly out of the way that I commanded them. They have made for themselves a golden calf and have worshipped it and sacrificed to it, and said, These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt. And the Lord said to Moses, I have seen this people, and behold, it is a stiff-necked people.
Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may burn hot against them, and I may consume them, in order that I may make a great nation of you. But Moses implored the Lord his God and said, O Lord, why does your wrath burn hot against your people, whom you have brought out of the land of Egypt with great power and with a mighty hand? Why should the Egyptians say, With evil intent did he bring them out, to kill them in the mountains and to consume them from the face of the earth? Turn from your burning anger and relent from this disaster against your people. Remember Abraham, Isaac and Israel your servants, to whom you swore by your own self and said to them, I will multiply your offspring as the stars of heaven, and all this land I have promised I will give to your offspring, and they shall inherit it forever.
And the Lord relented from the disaster that he had spoken of bringing on his people. Then Moses turned and went down from the mountain with the two tablets of the testimony in his hand, tablets that were written on both sides, on the front and on the back they were written. The tablets were the work of God and the writing was the writing of God engraved on the tablets.
When Joshua heard the noise of the people as they shouted, he said to Moses, There is a noise of war in the camp. But he said, It is not the sound of shouting for victory, or the sound of the cry of defeat, but the sound of singing that I hear. And as soon as he came near the camp and saw the calf and the dancing, Moses' anger burnt hot, and he threw the tablets out of his hand and broke them at the foot of the mountain.
He took the calf that they had made and burned it with fire, and ground it to powder, and scattered it on the water, and made the people of Israel drink it. And Moses said to Aaron, What did this people do to you that you have brought such a great sin upon them? And Aaron said, Let not the anger of my Lord burn hot. You know the people, that they are set on evil.
For they said to me, Make us gods who shall go before us. As for this Moses, the man who brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we do not know what has become of him. So I said to them, Let any who have gold take it off.
So they gave it to me, and I threw it into the fire, and out came this calf. And when Moses saw that the people had broken loose, for Aaron had let them break loose to the derision of their enemies, then Moses stood in the gate of the camp and said, Who is on the Lord's side? Come to me. And all the sons of Levi gathered around him, and he said to them, Thus says the Lord God of Israel, Put your sword on your side, each of you, and go to and fro from gate to gate throughout the camp, and each of you kill his brother, and his companion, and his neighbor.
And the sons of Levi did according to the word of Moses. And that day about three thousand men of the people fell. And Moses said, Today you have been ordained for the service of the Lord, each one at the cost of his son and of his brother, so that he might bestow a blessing upon you this day.
The next day Moses said to the people, You have sinned a great sin, and now I will go up to the Lord. Perhaps I can make atonement for your sin. So Moses returned to the Lord and said, Alas, this people have sinned a great sin.
They have made for themselves gods of gold. But now, if you will forgive their sin, but if not, please blot me out of your book that you have written. But the Lord said to Moses, Whoever has sinned against me, I will blot out of my book.
But now go, lead the people to the place about which I have spoken to you. Behold, my angels shall go before you. Nevertheless, in the day when I visit, I will visit their sin upon them.
Then the Lord sent a plague on the people, because they made the calf, the one that Aaron made. After the making of the covenant in chapter 24 of the book of Exodus, there is a large body of material devoted to the building of the tabernacle, the instructions for it, in chapters 25 to 31. And then suddenly we get this new passage of narrative, a very pivotal narrative within the whole story of Scripture, let alone the story of Exodus.
There's an interruption to the story of the tabernacle, which will be resumed later on in the book. This story is a very familiar one to us. We've heard it since our childhood perhaps, but there are many questions that maybe we've never thought to ask.
Simply because of its familiarity, we've never actually probed deep enough into some of the puzzles that it raises. Perhaps one of the most basic things we should ask is why worship a golden calf in the first place? What purpose is the calf actually designed to perform? If you hadn't read the story before, and read it for the first time, and ended halfway through verse 1, with the people speculating about Moses perhaps being dead because he hadn't returned yet from the top of the mountain, what would you think would happen next? Would you have guessed that they would ask to make a golden altar, and for that to serve as their god? It's a puzzling course of action. Likewise, it can be difficult to understand all the aftermath.
Why is there such a long aftermath to this? And what is the purpose of what happens next? What is the underlying logic of this story? Rabbi David Forman has a very interesting reading of this passage, which I've found very persuasive, and which I substantially follow. One of the keys to understanding his reading is recognising that the request to make this golden image is in response to the apparent death of Moses. Moses, the man who brought them out of Egypt, has died, it seems.
And what is the response? They don't seem to mourn. Rather, there's a crisis. As Moses has died, they need something.
And why don't they just establish Aaron as lead in his place? That doesn't seem to be good enough. There seems to be something more that they need. They ask Aaron to make them gods because Moses, the man who brought them up out of Egypt, seems to have died.
They need an alternative to the mortal Moses. Moses is as a god to them. And what they are looking for is not a replacement for the Lord so much as a replacement for Moses.
In chapter 4, verse 16, Moses is described as god to Aaron and later on as god to Pharaoh. And when we think about that language of being a god, we tend to think about it exclusively in reference to the creator god. But Elohim can be a more generic word for judge or ruler.
Moses is a power. But Israel isn't supposed to worship any other power. Moses is like a god with a small g for Israel.
But now he's died and there's a crisis. They aren't looking to the Lord. They're looking for another god to replace Moses.
They attribute taking them out of Egypt to Moses. Now, they use different language for that than they use of god. God's bringing the people out of Egypt is typically described using a different verb from Moses bringing the people out of Egypt.
Now, what are they looking for in such a god? What they seem to want is a blast shield between themselves and the Lord. They want a mediator, a go-between, someone that they can relate to almost as a substitute for God. And as you go through the book of Exodus, you'll see a lot of this playing out.
Moses is in a partnership with God. They believe God and they believe Moses, his servant, in chapter 14. And they complain against Moses particularly.
Moses is the complaint department. They can't complain to God so directly, so easily. So Moses is the one who constantly bears the brunt of their complaints and their objections and their grumbling.
But God himself, the Lord, seems to be a dark and unknown being to the Israelites. They want Moses to go between them, to shield them from God and to relate to Moses rather than relating to God very directly. They're very fearful of him and want Moses to interact for them.
For instance, in chapter 16 verses 2 and 3, the whole congregation of the people of Israel grumbled against Moses and Aaron in the wilderness. And the people of Israel said to them, Would that we had died by the hand of the Lord in the land of Egypt, when we sat by the meat pots and ate bread to the full, for you have brought us out into this wilderness to kill this whole assembly with hunger. So God seems to be this unknown being, this terrifying being, who lies behind Moses and Aaron, who deal with him, who are in partnership with him.
But you can complain against Moses, but not really against God in the same way. God is an untethered power, a great dark power lying behind Moses. And in chapter 20 we see a similar thing.
The people saw the thunder and the flashes of lightning and the sound of the trumpet and the mountain smoking. The people were afraid and trembled and they stood far off and said to Moses, You speak to us and we will listen, but do not let God speak to us lest we die. Moses said to the people, Do not fear, for God has come to test you, that the fear of him may be before you, that you may not sin.
The people stood far off while Moses drew near to the thick darkness where God was. In response to the complaint about the manna, God had tried to show them grace, to feed them in the wilderness, to show that he wasn't just the great powerful God who could defeat the Egyptians, he was the God who was with them, who was for them, who was going to give them food, who was going to show his love to them. And the importance of the Ten Commandments is similar.
God is making clear that he is the one who took them out of Egypt. And what they are trying to do in part is by emphasising the human Moses, they have this sort of demigod figure who gives them someone to complain to and someone to attempt to control. And so what they're looking for at this point is a replacement for Moses in many ways.
They're looking for someone to relate to as a substitute for relating directly to God, as a sort of blast shield for them. While God is trying to come close to his people, his people are trying to turn away from him, to avoid him, to avoid relating to him as he wants to relate to them. And the people gather themselves together against Aaron.
It says here, gather to Aaron, but where we find this language elsewhere in Numbers 16 verse 3 and Numbers 20 verse 2, it's the language of rebellion, gathering together against. And Aaron seems to do his best to try and channel the rebellious crowd as he can. OK, we'll construct this golden idol, but we'll worship the Lord.
So it's a replacement for Moses, but we're not replacing the Lord. When Moses returns, the people abandon the golden calf fairly quickly, it seems, and let Moses destroy it. Also, Aaron's weak response to Moses becomes more understandable in the light of this.
They weren't trying to replace the Lord, just the missing in action Moses. The God is described as having brought them out of Egypt, but using the verb that's usually described for Moses' part in that, not the verb for the Lord's part in that. And we should think back now to the commandments at the end of Exodus chapter 20, in verses 22 following.
They were not trying to replace the Lord then. They were trying to replace Moses with a God of gold, something that they had been explicitly commanded not to do. And we should probably reflect here a bit upon the meaning of images and the purpose of images.
Images can be a way that people try and intermediate between themselves and the divine, a symbolic medium that stands between them and God. A person can relate to the image rather than relating to God. It's difficult to relate to God.
You can't really control God in the same way. You can't really grasp God. But you can do with the image.
They're sort of masks and they're also blast shields, protecting you from direct encounter. And it can be a substitute for a direct relationship. When you relate to the image, you relate on your own terms.
You can master the image in terms of your imagination. You can project onto it. You can make it what you want it to be.
But when you're relating to God himself, that's terrifying. And so the image is a way of protecting you, shielding you from that actual encounter with the living God. And a sort of worship characterised by worship of images seems to produce a masking of people themselves.
The people rise up to play or to laugh. A laughter or play can be a sort of mask. It shields us from the significance of our own actions.
If I'm just joking or just playing, it's a denial that my actions have serious import. And in the same way when worship becomes a masking of God, we can also try and mask ourselves and our deeper selves that are exposed by his gaze. The place of the golden calf can be better understood when it's seen in juxtaposition to the tablets of the testimony, the tablets of stone.
Those tablets protect, but they also reveal. They aren't things fashioned by human power. They're the writing of God himself in a form that can be understood and related to human life.
So it's not an idol that we've put forward projecting onto God a safe mask that we can relate to instead of relating to the living God. Rather it's God speaking into the situation of his people. God declares that the people have corrupted themselves and that he will destroy them.
And here we can have maybe some sense of the background in the story of Genesis chapter 6 where God describes the corruption of the whole earth in the days of Noah. And there are lots of parallels between Noah and Moses here. We've already seen some in the previous chapters, but here they continue.
God declares to Moses that these are your people who you brought out. He's identifying the people with Moses rather than with himself. And then he calls for Moses to leave him alone and that he will wipe out everyone and start anew with Moses alone.
Now that is a very similar thing to what we see in the case of Noah. God wipes out everyone and then starts anew with one person. But Moses starts his speech by claiming that the people are the Lord's people.
It's a direct response to God's statement that they are his people. The people are still engaged in the idolatry though, so Moses can't yet ask for forgiveness. Rather what he does is he questions the purpose of God's anger.
What is the end of this anger? What will this anger achieve? He appeals to the Egyptians and to the forefathers. So on the one hand the Egyptians will blaspheme the name of the Lord when they believe that the Lord has just taken them out into the wilderness to destroy the Israelites. And he also appeals to the forefathers, the forefathers to whom God had made great promises that he would multiply them.
So he doesn't appeal to God's forgiveness or his mercy, nor does he apologise for the people. This isn't a time when any of those things will work because the people are still engaged in the sin. Rather he highlights God's covenant purposes displayed in his actions towards Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and his deliverance of Israel from Egypt.
And all that is achieved at this particular point is that God doesn't destroy the people. All that Moses is saying is do not destroy the people. He's not saying forgive them.
He's not saying have mercy upon them even.
He's saying do not destroy them. You cannot carry out this anger.
And Moses takes the tablets down the mountain and he breaks them. He doesn't seem to have been commanded to do so. Was he being disobedient in doing this? He shatters the tablets in the same place as the Israelites said that they would observe the covenant in chapter 24.
And then he grounds the calf to powder and makes the people drink it. Maybe we could see some parallels with the law of jealousy in Numbers chapter 5 here. Moses' anger flares up and it's the same response as God had to the sin of Israel.
Moses had told God not to be angry but then he is angry in the exact same way himself. What is the reasoning behind this? Aaron tries to pacify Moses' anger. And he uses words that are almost exactly the same as Moses uses when he tries to pacify God's anger.
Note how close the language is between verses 11 and 22. Moses is the one who is protecting Israel from God's wrath by enacting God's wrath. Wrath has to be enacted.
But if God were to enact his wrath the people would be wiped out.
Moses, by enacting the wrath as a human being for God, is able to preserve the people from the full force of God's wrath while identifying fully with God within the situation. He is fully identified with God's wrath.
He has the same response.
And yet his enaction of that is not one that will destroy the people. Prophets can sometimes act as representatives of God, as ones who stand in God's part relative to the people.
And the prophet can often enjoy a certain purview given by God with a seeming degree of liberty to pursue different courses of action in the name of the Lord. So David can consult Nathan concerning his desire to build a temple and Nathan says, Yes, the Lord is with you in this. And then the Lord says, No, actually I do not want David to build a temple.
And that seems to suggest that the prophet could speak on behalf of God in situations and God could check if they went against his will. But in many situations they could speak as a sort of mouthpiece even without being directly told to do something. Rather than having everything dictated to them, they are inspired by the spirit of God and given a degree of autonomy as they act out God's purpose within the limits that he has given them.
So what Moses does here is a very strong prophetic action. He stands on God's side relative to the people and enacts God's anger towards the people, his fierce wrath. The wrath that God couldn't express himself without destroying the people.
He stands in the way of God's wrath by enacting the wrath himself. And he summons all who are on the Lord's side to come to him. We can maybe think of the Lord's side in a richer sense than just fighting for God more generally.
On the Lord's side is identifying with God's posture relative to this act. And it is the sons of Levi that come to him at this point. They stand on God's side enacting God's anger with Moses.
Note the reminder of Levi's action in Genesis chapter 34 where Levi along with his brother Simeon is characterised by a zealous anger. But not in a way that's positive. Here they stand with the Lord.
They stand on Moses' side with the Lord and then they act in the name of the Lord with his vengeance, with his jealousy, with his zeal. And they are blessed for that. They're set apart.
They're ordained for divine service.
They represent from that point forward God to the people. They stand as God's servants within the house of Israel.
Moses now returns to the Lord and asks for forgiveness. He identifies himself fully with the Israelites. If God is going to blot them out, Moses asks for the Lord to blot him out too.
God then declares that he will send his angel before them and he will bring them into the land. But the Lord will visit their sin upon them when he visits them. His glorious presence will no longer accompany them.
Rather Moses and the angel will bring them into the land and God won't really relate to them in the same way anymore. They're no longer really identified as his people. This chapter ends then on a very negative note.
We're wondering what's going to happen next. How is the purpose of the Exodus going to be fulfilled after this setback? A setback that there seems there's no recovery from. A question to consider.
What are some of the similarities and contrasts between the construction of the golden calf and the construction of the tabernacle? A second question to consider. How can we see the pattern of the story of the fall playing out in the story here? Luke chapter 1 verses 26 to 38. And she was greatly troubled at the saying and tried to discern what sort of greeting this might be.
And the angel said to her, Do not be afraid Mary, for you have found favour with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High.
And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David. And he will reign over the house of Jacob forever. And of his kingdom there will be no end.
And Mary said to the angel, How will this be, since I am a virgin? And the angel answered her, The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. Therefore the child to be born will be called Holy, the Son of God. And behold, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son.
And this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. For nothing will be impossible with God. And Mary said, Behold, I am the servant of the Lord.
Let it be to me according to your word. And the angel departed from her. In Luke chapter 1 the angel Gabriel appears to the Virgin Mary in a city of Galilee called Nazareth.
This is not the first time we have met the angel Gabriel. The angel Gabriel has already appeared to Zachariah in the temple to announce the birth of John. But in the book of Daniel the angel Gabriel appears in Daniel chapter 8 verse 16 and chapter 9 verse 21 where he declares the fates of nations and of empires.
And his appearance again at this point evokes that background. This is going to be an event that occurs on the stage of the empires, on the stage of the great kingdoms. It's the story of the kingdoms playing out and the empires playing out and then their fate, the one that's going to come as the king of the Jews, the one who's going to fulfil God's great purposes for his people.
Now John and Jesus and the annunciation of their births seem to be connected together here. John is the great prophet like Samuel who's going to anoint and announce the coming king. And Jesus is the Davidic king who's going to fulfil the purpose of his father David.
It's important that Mary is betrothed to a man of the house of David. Christ's royal heritage comes through Joseph in particular. And Joseph is all too easily neglected in our tellings of the story of Jesus' nativity.
Nevertheless within Luke there's a particular focus upon the women at the beginning of the gospel. Why is this? I think there are a number of reasons. But first of all I think we should notice that God's great works in history often begin with an emphasis upon women.
And women struggling in birth. We can think about the story of the Exodus. The story of the Exodus begins with the Hebrew midwives, with Miriam, with Jochebed, with Pharaoh's daughter.
All of these characters are important within that context. Likewise the beginning of 1 Samuel. The story of the kingdom begins with Hannah praying in the temple.
And at the beginning of Luke we see similar things. It's the story of Elizabeth, the story of Mary, the story of Anna who prays in the temple. The story of the gospel in Luke's telling does not begin on the thrones of kings.
It does not begin in the courts of the cities. It begins in an out of the way place in a city of Galilee called Nazareth. And with a young woman who's being told by an angel.
The angel who's involved in these prophecies concerning empires given to Daniel at the very heart of that great empire. And now appearing to someone out in the sticks. God's kingdom works very differently from the kingdoms of men.
Mary is blessed in much the same language as Jail in Judges 5.24 Most blessed of women be jailed the wife of Heber the Kenite, of tent women most blessed. Jail of course was the head crushing woman who defeated Sisera. And Mary's song later on, the Magnificat, is like Hannah's from 1 Samuel 2.1-10. Mary is cut from the same cloth as the great heroines of the Old Testament.
Again this is a story of God proving his power over the womb. That the womb, whether it's barren, whether it is the virgin's womb, that God is powerful to bring life from that womb. The virgin birth once more reminds us that the kingdom is not spread by man's virility.
In the Old Testament that's brought home by the right of circumcision. And the means by which Abraham is made fruitful is through promise, not through the flesh. And that point could not be more emphasised here.
Mary's child will be born by the power of the Holy Spirit, not by any action of man. And the way this promised child is described is important because it's kingdom themes that are prominent. Jesus will be the Davidic King, the deliverer of his people.
The Spirit overshadows Mary just as it hovered over the waters of creation at the very beginning. And just as it covered the tabernacle in Exodus chapter 40. And this should help us to understand some of the things that are going on here.
It's a new creation. There's a new man, the last Adam being formed. Likewise there's a tabernacle theme.
The tabernacle is being inhabited by God's presence. As the tabernacle could represent the bride in relationship to the bridegroom. So Mary is now a sort of tabernacle bearing the presence of the Lord within her.
And perhaps we should also hear themes of the reversal of the fall. We can talk about the blessed fruit of Mary's womb. The womb which once mediated judgement to the woman now becomes the means of blessing.
The means by which she will fulfil the promise that was given at the very beginning. That the child of the woman would defeat the serpent, would crush its head. Jesus is the seed of the woman.
And he's the seed of the woman in particular as Mary is a virgin. Adam was dead as a result of his sin. And Eve was the mother of all living.
And the promised seed comes primarily in the relationship between God and the womb of the woman. Not with the agency of man. The description of the Holy Spirit coming upon Mary and the power of the Most High overshadowing her.
Should also alert us to connections with the beginning of Acts. Where that is something very similar to the promise that's given to the church. That the Spirit will come upon them and that they will be clothed with power from on high.
That's the promise that they are given. And that's what happens at Pentecost. Many have seen in this event a sort of Marian Pentecost.
And I think they're right to do so. The Spirit is coming upon Mary in the same way as the Spirit will later come upon the church. The church will bear Christ within it as a new temple.
And Mary here is a sort of temple. Bearing the presence of the Lord in her womb. Birth from the virgin's womb is a sign of things changing.
Of new things happening. Things that were formerly deemed impossible. And the angel Gabriel declares to Mary that her relative Elizabeth is already conceiving a son in her old age.
And that nothing will be impossible with God. This is a sign of things to come. Things are changing.
Old expectations will no longer hold true. God is going to act and he's going to change and transform the situation. Mary's response is one of profound faith.
She gives herself to the Lord as his servant and handmaid. She willingly accepts the vocation that has been laid upon her. A vocation that's not just about bearing a child to term.
But about living the entirety of her life as the mother of this child. The mother of the Messiah. With all the tragedy.
With all the uncertainty. With all the difficulty that that will involve. A question to consider.
How can we regard Mary as a sort of archetype of the church?

More on OpenTheo

What Progressive Christian Teachings Should I Look Out For?
What Progressive Christian Teachings Should I Look Out For?
#STRask
November 7, 2024
Questions about what progressive Christian teachings one should look out for and whether John 16:12–13 provides justification for the views of progres
Are Our Physical Ailments Caused by Spiritual Warfare?
Are Our Physical Ailments Caused by Spiritual Warfare?
#STRask
December 5, 2024
Questions about whether our physical ailments are caused by spiritual warfare, how much agency demons have in light of the fact that God sometimes sen
Did Jesus Ever Experience Fear?
Did Jesus Ever Experience Fear?
#STRask
December 12, 2024
Questions about whether Jesus ever experienced fear, why Jesus would pray three times for something he already knew he would be denied, and a song tha
Guillermo Gonzalez: Earth is Designed for Discovery
Guillermo Gonzalez: Earth is Designed for Discovery
Knight & Rose Show
October 26, 2024
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose welcome Dr. Guillermo Gonzalez to discuss the new 20th anniversary edition of "The Privileged Planet". Guillermo explai
How Should I Pray About Big Decisions If I Can’t Expect a Confirmation from God?
How Should I Pray About Big Decisions If I Can’t Expect a Confirmation from God?
#STRask
January 2, 2025
Questions about how we should pray about big decisions if we can’t expect to hear a “yes“ or “no” from God, what Greg means by “listening prayer,” and
It’s Christmastime with Justin Taylor and Collin Hansen
It’s Christmastime with Justin Taylor and Collin Hansen
Life and Books and Everything
December 18, 2024
We’ve all been waiting, and it’s finally here: the annual Christmas LBE. Listen in as the three amigos talk about Christmas movies, favorite books, wh
The Cosmos in a Tent
The Cosmos in a Tent
Alastair Roberts
January 8, 2025
The following was first published on my Substack: https://argosy.substack.com/p/5-the-cosmos-in-a-tent. Follow my Substack, the Anchored Argosy at ht
Our God Contracted to a Span
Our God Contracted to a Span
Alastair Roberts
January 2, 2025
The following was first published on my Substack: https://argosy.substack.com/p/43-our-god-contracted-to-a-span. Follow my Substack, the Anchored Arg
How Is Biblical Inspiration Different from Automatic Writing?
How Is Biblical Inspiration Different from Automatic Writing?
#STRask
October 31, 2024
Questions about how biblical inspiration differs from automatic writing, whether or not we don’t know who wrote 74% of the New Testament, signing a ma
How Do You Convince a Former Christian That Jesus Is God?
How Do You Convince a Former Christian That Jesus Is God?
#STRask
November 14, 2024
Questions about how to convince a former Christian that Jesus is God, whether Jesus’ human nature was created, and what the Bible means when it says J
Do You Need to Forgive God?
Do You Need to Forgive God?
#STRask
November 11, 2024
Questions about whether we ever need to forgive God in order to heal our emotions, whether it’s unbiblical to tell someone he needs to forgive himself
John 21: A Fitting Epilogue
John 21: A Fitting Epilogue
Alastair Roberts
November 19, 2024
The following was first published over on The Anchored Argosy Substack: https://argosy.substack.com/p/32-intellectual-salons-and-a-new. Follow my Sub
Selden College (with Dr Timothy Edwards)
Selden College (with Dr Timothy Edwards)
Alastair Roberts
October 21, 2024
Dr Timothy Edwards is Principal and Academic Dean of Selden College, a new Christian liberal arts college, which opens its doors to students in Octobe
The Anglicanism of C.S. Lewis
The Anglicanism of C.S. Lewis
Alastair Roberts
October 29, 2024
The following is a reading of a reflection first published on our Substack: https://argosy.substack.com/p/lewis-the-anglican. A version of it was also
What Is the Mission of the Church? with Brian DeVries
What Is the Mission of the Church? with Brian DeVries
Life and Books and Everything
December 11, 2024
Mission is one of those words that Christians use all the time. So are words like “missions” and missionaries.” But what do they mean? Is “mission” ev