OpenTheo

Jonah (Full Book)

Jonah — Steve Gregg
00:00
00:00

Jonah (Full Book)

Jonah
JonahSteve Gregg

In this study of the book of Jonah, Steve Gregg provides historical and cultural context to the story. Despite being a prophet of Israel, Jonah was called to prophesy to the pagan nation of Nineveh, and although he initially resisted, he eventually preached to the people and they repented. Gregg highlights the themes of God's compassion for sinners, even those outside of His chosen people, and the danger of self-centeredness and lack of compassion for others.

Share

Transcript

We're going to be studying the book of Jonah. It's a short book, four short chapters. You can read through the whole book in about 10-15 minutes, actually.
But it's possible to read through a short book and miss some of the important things that God has in mind for us to gain from it, because these books of the prophets, like the rest of the scripture, are inspired and they contain God's message to us. It's interesting that this is, of all the prophetic books, Jonah is the only one that is entirely a historical narrative. Now, Jeremiah has a little bit of historical narrative, as does Ezekiel, and Isaiah has some, but most of the books of the prophets are primarily made up of oracles of the prophets speaking to, usually Israel or Judah, and occasionally to a non-Jewish nation.
It's not very common that the prophets were sent to pagan nations,
although in the larger prophets, like Isaiah, and Jeremiah, and Ezekiel, there are blocks of chapters in them, where a chapter or so might be addressed to Babylon, or Assyria, or Edom, or the Philistines, or some other group that's not Israel. But there are three prophetic books, all of them belong to what we call the minor prophets, that are addressed to non-Jewish audiences, and no part of them is addressed to Jews, and that's pretty unusual in the Old Testament. Jonah is one, and his prophecy was to a city called Nineveh, which was the capital of Assyria.
The Assyrian Empire is the empire that destroyed the northern kingdom of Israel in 722 BC, and you may remember after David's time, Solomon reigned, and after Solomon died, his son Rehoboam reigned in Jerusalem, and then during his reign, the nation of Israel divided into two nations. The northern ten tribes rebelled against David's successors, and the tribe of Judah and Benjamin remained loyal. And the ten tribes to the north formed their own nation, and they called that nation Israel, and the southern kingdom was called Judah.
Well, these kingdoms ran parallel to each other for a long time, each having their own kings separate from each other, they were independent from each other nations, and the northern kingdom fell in 722 to the Assyrians. Sometime later, about twenty years later or so, the Assyrians also attacked the capital of Judah to the south, and the capital of Judah was Jerusalem. At that time, however, Judah had one of the few good kings that they ever had, and that was Hezekiah, and under the counsel of Isaiah, Hezekiah sought the Lord and prayed for deliverance, and this huge army of the Assyrians had surrounded Jerusalem, and Jerusalem was no match for them, but they were no match for God, and God sent an angel one night who killed 185,000 of the Assyrian troops outside the walls of Jerusalem, and so in the morning when they found so many of them dead, they were spooked, and they withdrew and didn't bother Judah anymore.
So, the Assyrian empire had destroyed the northern kingdom of Israel, and attempted to do the same in the south, but the godly king Hezekiah, in seeking the Lord, was able to preserve the nation from destruction, and they were much later conquered by the Babylonians, after the Babylonians had conquered the Assyrians. So, the Assyrians were the superpower in the Near East, in the time of Jonah, and in some of the biblical story time. But then, of course, later the Babylonians came, and they became the new superpower, and they conquered the Assyrians.
Now, Jonah lived at a time where Nineveh, the capital of Assyria, was 40 days from its own destruction. That was the message that God sent Jonah to take, to Nineveh. He said, go and tell them, in 40 days, Nineveh will perish.
Now, it's not entirely clear who would have destroyed them, perhaps natural causes would have destroyed them, but the Babylonian empire, which actually did conquer them 150 years later than Jonah's time, had not really risen to the point where it was a significant power in Jonah's day, and therefore would not really be likely to conquer or even attack Assyria. So, we're not told exactly what the nature of the destruction of Nineveh would have been at that early time, before the Babylonians really existed as a power to destroy Nineveh, which is what later happened. But, God told Jonah that Nineveh was going to be destroyed.
Now, Jonah was not very interested in Nineveh, although Assyria had not yet destroyed his own nation, because he lived at least some 30 or more years before that. Nonetheless, he didn't like the Assyrians. First of all, Jews didn't like Gentiles in general.
Jews were pretty smug about being the people of God, the Gentiles were not, and so they didn't really care that much about the fate of the Gentiles. They figured the Gentiles were all worthy of judgment, they're all going to hell anyway, and so what did he care if Nineveh was going to perish? It was a pagan nation's capital. And, beyond the generic hatred for Gentiles that many Jews had, Jonah knew that Assyria was a threat to his own people.
They were swallowing up other nations in the region, and his own nation was threatened. He'd love it if the Ninevites, you know, perished. He would have been very happy to see the destruction of the Assyrian power.
So, when God said, go warn them, Jonah didn't want to warn them. He just wanted to buy some time, he only needed to wait 40 days. And, then it would perish.
So, he decided to take a cruise and go the other direction, on the Mediterranean, and go west to Spain. And, it wasn't called Spain back then, but that's where he set sail for Tarshish. And, of course, God apprehended him.
And, the way that God apprehended him has become a very famous story. Because, God sent a storm to endanger the ship that he was on, and he was thrown overboard at his own request, and then, of course, he was swallowed by a great fish. And, three days and three nights later, he was vomited on the shore, and God commissioned him again, go to Nineveh, and give him this message.
So, this time Jonah, not wishing to have a repeat voyage like that, some people, we actually had a, we actually went on a cruise, not too long ago, it was about a year ago. And, there were some things very, what should I say, not desirable about it, there were some things that went wrong. But, it wasn't like Jonah's.
Jonah had a terrible storm, and a submarine ride as well. And, it was very unpleasant, very dark, very stinky, I'm sure. So, when he was vomited ashore, he said, I don't want another cruise like that, so I'm going to obey this time.
And, he went to Nineveh, and proclaimed the message. Now, interestingly, the people of Nineveh, and even the king, were so smitten, in their conscience, by his message, that they actually repented. Which is something, of course, that we never find Israel, or Judah doing, when the prophets preach to them.
But, here, these pagans, the first time they hear anything from one of God's prophets, they actually respond, and repent. And so, Jonah knew that God was now not going to destroy Nineveh, even though he said he would. Now, let me show you something.
Jeremiah, in chapter 18, tells us something very generic, about how God deals with nations. In Jeremiah 18, 7 through 10, the prophet said, the instant I speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck it up, to pull it down, and to destroy it, which is, of course, what he was threatening to do to Nineveh, if that nation against whom I have spoken, turns from its evil, I will repent of the disaster that I thought I would bring upon it. So, that happened in the case of Jonah's recipients.
They repented, and God repented of the destruction he was going to bring upon it. Then God says, and the instant I speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it, if it does evil in my sight, so that it does not obey my voice, then I will repent concerning the good with which I said I would benefit it. So, Paul says this cuts both ways.
I mean, I quote Paul so much. Jeremiah says, this cuts both ways, really. If a nation is in trouble with God, but they repent, they'll be out of trouble.
If a nation is on good terms with God, but they go bad, well, they'll be in trouble. So, he said, I'll repent of the good things I said I'd do. And by the way, this latter part, we can see had to do with Israel.
Israel is the only nation in the Bible that God ever said he was going to build and plant it. But he said, if I ever say about a nation, I'm going to build and plant it, but if they turn against me, I'm going to destroy them. I'm going to repent of all the good I said I'd do.
So, that did happen to Israel. They later, after Jeremiah's time, Judah at least, was conquered by Babylon. More, you know, several centuries later, the restored nation was destroyed by the Romans.
And so, even though Israel once had promises that God had made for them, that he blessed them and so forth, he said, oh, you turn from me, I'm going to change my mind about that. And he did. But, what we see in Jonah is the first part of this statement.
Anytime I say I'm going to destroy a nation, if they repent and turn from evil, I will repent of what I said I would do. And it actually says in Jonah that when God saw that Nineveh had repented, God repented, it says, which means changed his mind, of the evil that he said he would do. Now, Jonah therefore knew that Nineveh would not be destroyed at this point, which was a disappointment to him.
Now, when you and I try to bring somebody to Christ, if they convert, we're excited about it. We'd love it if we could convert the whole nation. But Jonah converted a whole nation here, at least a whole capital city of a nation, of an empire, and he wasn't happy about it.
Because he knew that God would now not destroy them, and he was quite eager to see them destroyed. So he was the most reluctant preacher, and had the worst attitude of any preacher I've ever heard of. And so he went out to pout.
And he went and sat on a hillside outside Nineveh to watch it, to see what was going to happen. And he was out in the sun there, and he was very uncomfortable. And a fast-growing plant grew up while he was there.
The Bible says the Lord prepared it, so it was kind of a miraculous thing, just like the fish was kind of a miraculous thing. And this plant grew up overnight and gave him shade, and he was glad for the shade, but then some kind of a worm, the Bible says, some kind of a bug or something destroyed that plant, and it withered up. So he was out in the sun again, and in the heat, and he was complaining about that.
And God said, well, you know, you care about that plant, that you didn't work for, you don't deserve it, it was a comfort to you, and now it's gone. You care about that plant, but you don't care about these people of Nineveh, all these people that were about to perish. You care about the plant perishing because you're uncomfortable with it gone.
But you didn't care about the 120,000 people in Nineveh who don't know which way is up, they don't know if they're left-handed or right-handed, they don't know anything, they're ignorant of the ways of God, and you would have had them destroyed. You would have had me destroy them. And God was prepared to if they hadn't repented, but they did.
So this is the whole story. I just told you the whole story of the book, there's nothing else in it, but we're going to look at it verse by verse. But I want to give you some background about Jonah a little bit.
The name Jonah means dove in Hebrew, which is not, as far as I know, significant to the book itself. A dove is usually associated with peace, sometimes in the Bible with the Holy Spirit. He was a spirit-filled prophet, though he didn't have much of a spiritual attitude, obviously, so I don't really know that the meaning of his name is going to be significant to us.
But Jonah is known to have lived, historically, from a statement we read in 2 Kings chapter 14, if you've read the books of Kings, you know that this is the history of the monarchy, both the northern and the southern kingdom of Israel and Judah. And in 2 Kings 14, during the reign of Jeroboam II, it says this in verse 25, he, meaning Jeroboam II, restored the territory of Israel from the entrance of Hamath to the sea of the Arabah, according to the word of the Lord God of Israel, which he had spoken through his servant Jonah, the son of Amittai, the prophet, who was from Gathhefer. Now, that's the same Jonah that we have in the book of Jonah.
We don't really understand much about this, because it just says that Jeroboam recovered some property for the country, he annexed some territory that apparently had been his before, of course, as he recovered it, and he did so according to the prophesying of Jonah, this Jonah. Now, Jonah is said to be the son of Amittai, but that doesn't give us much information, because we don't know who Amittai was. He was from Gathhefer.
Gathhefer was a city up in the northern kingdom, so he's one of the prophets of the north. It's kind of interesting that the Jews, once the kingdom was divided, were almost as prejudiced against the Israelites of the north as they were against Gentiles. Not quite, but in Jesus' day, these northern kingdoms had intermarried with Gentiles and became what we call the Samaritans, and the Jews had tremendous disgust for Samaritans.
Samaria was the region north of Judah in the time of Christ, and had been, that and Galilee together, had been the region of the northern tribes in the days of Rehoboam. But the reason I mention this is that when the Pharisees and the chief priests were plotting against Jesus, in John chapter 7, in verse 52, they were plotting to kill Jesus, and there was a secret admirer of Jesus among them named Nicodemus. And Nicodemus spoke up for Jesus and said, what, does our law condemn a man before it hears what he says and sees what he does? And these chief priests didn't expect any opposition to their plan from within their own circle.
They snapped at him and said, what, are you also a Galilean? Search and look, for no prophet arises out of Galilee. Now remember, they had very low view of Galileans, but they had forgotten there were prophets who had arisen out of Galilee, Jonah being one of them, Elijah and Elisha being others. Amos was a Galilean prophet, so they were not quite accurate, even though they were Bible scholars.
They said, no prophet rises out of Galilee. But Jonah did, and he was a prophet. And he was from Gath Hefer.
Now Gath was a city of the Philistines, but there were five Philistine cities in the land of Israel. One of them was Gath, and then there were villages around them that were not in those walled Philistine cities, and they were sometimes associated geographically with them. So Gath Hefer was a city of the Jews that was in the region of Gath, the Philistine city.
That's what Gath Hefer refers to. There is a Jewish tradition, though it's not confirmed anywhere, that Jonah was the son of the widow of Zarephath. Now you might remember Elijah had, during the famine in the days of Ahab and Jezebel, traveled out of the country because Jezebel was trying to hunt him down.
And he'd gone up into Zarephath in the Gentile region to the north there, and a woman and her son, a widow, were about ready to starve. And Elijah came and said, make me a cake and give it to me. She said, I only have a little bit of flour and a little bit of oil.
I was about to make my last muffin and give it to my son and me, and then we're going to die from the famine. And Elijah said, give it to me and you'll live. And she did, and there was enough food for all of them, and then the flour and the oil didn't run out for the whole three and a half years of the famine.
So this woman and her son were preserved from starvation by playing hostess to Elijah in their home and feeding him. There's a Jewish tradition that Jonah was the son of that woman. But Jewish tradition doesn't always have solid historical basis.
It's what the rabbis come up with, and a lot of times these stories arise years later, centuries later, so we don't know, we can't confirm that he was. But that's kind of an interesting connection in the Jewish mind about him. Contemporary with Jonah were Amos and Hosea in the northern kingdom.
Like Nahum and like Obadiah, Jonah is one of three prophets of Israel who actually didn't prophesy to Israel. Jonah, as we saw, prophesied against Nineveh. So did Nahum, only it was like a hundred and something years later.
Nahum came and Nineveh, which had repented in the days of Jonah, had plenty of time to return back to their evil ways. It was now several generations later. You can certainly remember a couple of generations back, if you're old enough, how different America was than it is now, culturally, sinfully, spiritually.
A lot more sympathy for the things of God two generations ago than now. And so you can see that even with the great revival in Nineveh and Jonah, you know, several generations later, they had turned back to their evil ways. And Nahum was sent to them to prophesy their impending doom.
And Nineveh was eventually destroyed in 612 BC by the Babylonians. Okay, so, and by the Medes, by the way, the Medes and the Babylonians were a confederacy against them at that time. When we read, oh, by the way, Obadiah is another prophet of the pagan nations.
He spoke to Edom, the Edomites. One chapter long book, Obadiah, is a prophet against the Edomites. The New Testament would suggest that Jonah was in at least one or two senses a type of Christ.
Now, you know the term a type of Christ. The word tupos in the Greek type means a pattern. And many things in the Old Testament are types or patterns of Christ.
For example, Paul tells us in Romans five that Adam was a type of Christ. We, you know, Bible scholars will tell us that David was a type of Christ. He certainly was.
And there are many characters in the Old Testament that are a type of Christ, meaning they weren't Christ. They were someone else. They were an ordinary person, but events in their lives, at least the ones that are recorded, are orchestrated by God to resemble something Christ would do.
So, we can interpret Jonah this way over in Matthew chapter 12. And Jesus said in verse 40 and 41, For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. The men of Nineveh will rise up in judgment with this generation and condemn it because they repented at the preaching of Jonah.
And indeed, a greater than Jonah is here. Now, there's two ways in which Jonah is kind of a type of Christ. One is that he resembled Christ in being buried, as it were, for three days and emerging alive again.
Now, Jonah may have died. Some commentators believe that Jonah actually died in the belly of the whale and then was resurrected by God and vomited out. The book of Jonah doesn't say that.
But some people think that what Jesus said would imply that. Because as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so shall the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. They think, well, the Son of Man was dead in the heart of the earth.
And if Jonah was like that in the belly of the whale, then he must have been dead in the belly of the whale. Also, in chapter 2 of Jonah, when he's praying, he's resurrected. I believe that's reading more into the story than we are required to and maybe more than we're entitled to.
I believe it would be mentioned very clearly if Jonah had died and risen again, since that's a pretty unusual kind of miracle. Certainly being swallowed by a fish and being vomited out alive is also an unusual miracle. But to be resurrected from the dead and have no mention of it in a story that's full of mentioning miracles, I mean, there's a miraculous storm, there's a miraculous ceasing of the storm, there's a miraculous fish, there's a miraculous vomiting out of Jonah alive, there's a miraculous plant that grows up to shade him and a miraculous worm that kills it, and there's a miraculous revival in Nineveh.
I mean, the book's full of miracles. If Jonah had actually died and it doesn't mention it. So I think rather simply the fact that Jonah was consumed by the fish and came out three days and three nights later is what resembles Jesus being swallowed by the earth as it were buried and then emerging alive afterwards.
That's the comparison that Jesus made. But he also makes a contrast and Jonah can be a type of Christ in contrast also. Because when Paul says in chapter five that Adam is a type of Christ, it's really a contrasting type because Adam through his sin brought sin on the whole world.
Christ through his righteousness brought righteousness on many. So Paul says that's, Adam's a type of Christ but in a sense a type in contrast. Both of them affected a whole race but they did so in opposite ways.
And so also Jonah and Jesus both preached to sinners. Jesus preached to the Jews and Jonah to Gentiles but they had opposite results. The Jews for the most part rejected Jesus and the Gentiles accepted what Jonah did in his message.
So that's why Jesus indicates that the people of Jonah are more righteous than the Jews. Now that's a pretty harsh statement to say to Jews who are so convinced that they're the greatest people ever because God gave them the law. But that's what Jesus said and it's not the only time Jesus pointed out that Gentiles were more receptive to his word than the Jews were.
When the centurion in Matthew eight who was a Gentile said to Jesus, listen my servant needs to be healed but I'm not going to ask you to just say the word and it'll be done. And Jesus said, wow I have not encountered such faith in all of Israel. Here's a Gentile who's got an exceptional amount of faith he says, I haven't met a Jew with this kind of faith.
I've not encountered this kind of faith in all Israel. So Jesus sometimes did make this point that the Gentiles received more. In fact in Luke chapter four when Jesus was preaching he's preaching he says, you know in the days of Elijah there are many Jewish widows who could have stood a miraculous provision of food from God but it wasn't a Jew it was a Gentile that Elijah was sent to and she received the benefits presuming that she had faith and the people in Israel that were passed over did not.
They were worshipers of Baal. And then Jesus said, who were never healed but a Gentile lover name in the Syrian he was healed he's a Gentile and Jesus saying those two things almost got him thrown off a cliff if you read Luke chapter four. So the Jews didn't like this kind of contrast between themselves and Gentiles but on many occasions Jesus points out you know Gentiles have a better track record of responding to God's word than you Jews do and that's the point he makes that the people of Nineveh they're more righteous than you because they responded to the preaching they'll rise up and point the finger at you and condemn you in the judgment because you didn't receive the preaching of one greater than Jonah.
Jesus referred to himself as one greater than Jonah. Now the repentance of Nineveh is there any historical record of this? There is not outside the Bible. Sometimes when we read of things in the Bible like the Exodus the nation of Egypt suffered a great deal from the 10 plagues and then the armies perished in the sea and so forth and Israel escaped people say well we don't seem to have any secular historical records of such a thing happening to Egypt therefore the Bible's wrong.
Now this is a very dangerous thing to suggest honestly not just because you're blaspheming against the word of God but simply it's a way to set yourself up for embarrassment because many times the Bible is a historical character and it turned out later discoveries proved them wrong like the Hittites in the Old Testament were very commonly mentioned but until the 1800s scholars couldn't find any evidence that the Hittites had ever existed and so of course skeptics said well the Hittites they never existed the Bible's just fiction it's just making them up until they found Hittite civilization and they uncovered enough that it's been 400 years of that civilization one of the greatest civilizations in the Middle East in the time of Abraham same thing with the fall of Babylon all the secular historians and artifacts that had been found suggested that when Babylon fell the king of Babylon was named Nabonidus Herodotus and Thucydides the Greek historians writing 400 years before Christ they said that Babylon fell during the reign of King Nabonidus the king of Babylon when it fell was Belshazzar which is not the same as Nabonidus so the critics said well the Bible's wrong and of course who cares it's just fiction it's just myths until 1853 when a temple in Ur of the Chaldeans was found to a god worshipped by Nabonidus the last king of Babylon and there's an inscription there where he said reverence for you speaking to this god this deity may reverence for you dwell in my first born favorite son Belshazzar now Belshazzar had never been heard of except in Daniel 5 Daniel 5 is the only place in the Bible and frankly the only place in any written histories of the ancient world only Daniel 5 mentions Belshazzar but now archaeologists have discovered Belshazzar he was the son of Nabonidus because more has been found since 1853 about him that Nabonidus the king of Babylon was in semi-retirement in Arabia when the Medes and the Persians conquered Babylon and his son Belshazzar was given the rule of the city itself and was present when Cyrus and the Medes came in and so the Bible is correct what's more the correctness of the Bible is shown in even we could say an accidental way in Daniel 5 Belshazzar when he sees the writing on the wall says anyone who can interpret this for me I'll make him third ruler of the kingdom now why did he say the third ruler there's no hint in Daniel why he'd say the third ruler why not the second well we now know from archaeology Belshazzar himself was the second his father Nabonidus was the first he couldn't give away a position above that of third ruler so I mean there's all these cynics and skeptics always said it was not so if someone says well there's no evidence of the exodus there's no evidence of Nineveh repenting like this well if you're going to say that the biblical record is not sufficient historical record then you're on the losing side you're on the wrong side of history because everyone who says that eventually gets embarrassed no we have not found the evidence of the Ninevites but some of these things we may never find because it's not the kind of thing that nations record about themselves most ancient kings made sure that their court historians recorded only the things that weren't embarrassing to them if a historian of the king was writing his history and wrote something that was embarrassing to the king off with his head get me a new historian here he would have a pharaoh in their history and no doubt they would be very careful to leave that out of their records but also the Ninevites repentance I'm not saying that they would be embarrassed of that later because it turned out well and it wasn't really a humiliation to them but you know revivals aren't just they're not really the kind of things that make it into all secular histories and historiography written now than they did in ancient times I don't know that the if you get a book on American history or English history that you're going to really find much about the revivals they're going to be interested more about wars and politics and things like that you know a short-lived revival in Nineveh might not be the kind of thing that later historians would even care to mention but if you look at the sources the critic always would say well see the Bible must not be true these other sources are true you know Herodotus said that Nabonidus was the last king of Babylon Daniel said it was Belshazzar Daniel must be wrong well as it turns out they were both right but who's to say that Herodotus couldn't be wrong and the Bible right the Bible is historically accurate and just the fact that we don't any reasonable doubt on the historicity of it. The reason that many people think Jonah is not historical is because they have an a priori rejection of miracles. They have a worldview called naturalism which means there's only nature, there's no supernatural.
There's no ghosts,
there's no god, there's no angels, there's no miracles. Those are supernatural things. So we only have a natural world with natural laws.
That's pretty much how they look at it. And
uh that being so that's their starting point. They've decided before they even inquire.
Well
somebody who's already decided well I'm not even going to inquire into it because I know miracles don't happen. Well they're just simply exhibiting their prejudice and their bigotry. An open-minded person would say well maybe I haven't seen a miracle but that doesn't mean God's never done any.
Certainly Christians all believe in miracles. They believe in the resurrection of Christ and the
miracles he did. So there shouldn't be any difficulty in believing in the same God doing miracles in the Old Testament.
Jonah has as I said several miracles in it. We think of the
fish and the three days and the three nights and so forth as the main plot of the story but it's not. It's only part of the story.
There's four chapters
and the fish only occupies one of them and it's an early one. There's more things after that. Some perhaps equally if not more miraculous like the conversion of a whole city or like the gourd appearing overnight and then dying overnight.
I mean this just
the book is every chapter has a miracle in it. And so the fish is only one. Now I will say this that because many people say well a man could not live inside of a fish for three days and three nights and come out alive.
There's been many Christians who've tried to prove otherwise
and many Christian commentators and documents have tried to use the story of a man named Bartley who was said to be a modern day Jonah. This story I believe happened in the 1800s if I'm not mistaken in the Falkland Islands. I'm going to read you just from Wikipedia about him.
You can
much on the internet about James Bartley as the modern day Jonah. This is how the story is summarized on Wikipedia. The story is reported is that during a whaling expedition off the Falkland Islands Bartley's boat was attacked by the whale and he landed inside the whale's mouth.
He survived
the ordeal and was carved out of the stomach by his peers when they not knowing he was inside caught and began skinning the whale because of the hot weather which would have rotted the whale meat. It was said to be I'm sorry it was said that he was in the whale for 36 hours and it was also said that his skin had been bleached by the gastric juices and that he was blind the rest of his life. He was however supposed to have returned to work within three weeks of his account.
He died 18 years
and his tombstone is in Gloucester. It says James Bartley a modern day Jonah. While the veracity of the story is in question it is physically possible for a sperm whale to swallow a human whole as they have been known to swallow giant squid whole which are bigger than humans.
However such a person would
drown or suffocate in the whale's stomach says Wikipedia under their article on James Bartley. Now I will say this the story may not be reliable. For one thing the boat he was on they've looked at the actually register I mean people have gone back to look at the records and there was no one named James Bartley registered on the crew of that particular boat and it wasn't a whaling boat.
It was another kind of boat so some people said well this didn't happen and yet some
of the details of the story including his burial and so forth and his tombstone would seem to be um it's repeated a great deal in newspapers and things like that at the time but it's just in question. We don't know whether this really happened or not. Christians sometimes think it would help if we could find a modern day case of someone who really did survive in the belly of a whale and come out alive then that would show that it could happen to Jonah but there's no need to do that.
That's like people saying we need to go up on Mount Erat and find the ark because if we find it
we'll really know that Noah's flood was true. Well guess what? I know that Noah's flood was true without anyone finding the ark. I don't need anyone to find an ark to let me know that Noah's flood was true.
I know because God's word says it. I don't need someone to find a modern case of a
man surviving in a whale and coming out alive in order to know that this happened to Jonah because the word of God says that. Jesus said it happened for you know Jonah said it happened and Jesus said that's two witnesses and that's good enough for me even one would be enough it was just Jesus.
So also we should note that there's no suggestion in the book of Jonah that this was a natural case of surviving. Everything about the story was miraculous even if a man would drown or suffocate in the belly of a whale although I saw Pinocchio and I saw that a man could and his goldfish and his cat could all survive in a big whale and had a big room inside there and when the whale sneezed they escaped if you didn't see Pinocchio when you're a kid but actually I don't think that's a true story but the story of Bartley may or may not be. Whether Bartley really had that experience or not Jonah did and we have confirmation from Jesus' own lips on that and it was a miracle perhaps maybe it's possible naturally but whether it is or not this is a work of God that we're talking about.
I remember Billy Graham saying I believe Jonah was swallowed by the whale because
God can do anything he says if God wants to he thinks he said I think Jonah could have swallowed the whale and you know I suppose that's possible Jesus said that with God nothing's impossible including a camel going through the eye of a needle I suppose for a whale going through the gullet of a man that would be possible if God wanted it to I can't quite picture how that would happen but nothing's impossible with God that's what Jesus said in that very connection okay so did Nineveh really repent did that really happen apparently it did the Bible says it did and that's enough for me okay let's let me just kind of go through the book very quickly and make some explanatory commentary on it Jonah I'm reading the by the way if you wonder I'm reading the New King James I don't know people have different versions than that here but Jonah chapter 1 verse 1 now the word of the Lord came to Jonah the son of Amittai saying arise go to Nineveh that great city and cry out against it for their wickedness has come up before me that's kind of what God said to Abraham when he said I'm going down to check out Sodom and Gomorrah because their wickedness has come up before me it's like it's as if God's hearing reports from heaven about what's going on on earth he's hearing some pretty wicked you know nations are down there need to be maybe judged it's a kind of a we'd have said it's kind of an anthropomorphism where God is being talked about as if he's a person it's a literary device that we find often in the Bible like when God comes and says okay where's your brother like he doesn't know you know he's it depicts God as if he you know as if he doesn't know things and so forth and so when he's walking with Abraham in Genesis 18 you know the the wickedness of Sodom has come up before me I mean I've heard a report of it I'm going down there he says and if it's true I'll know well like he didn't already so I mean the Bible talks that way like God is you know getting reports from people and things like that but uh it's it's not trying to tell us that God didn't really know or that he depends on such reports so he says Jonah rose to flee to Tarshish now Tarshish is uh Tartasus which is an ancient location in what would now be southern Spain so he's going west from Israel the opposite direction Assyria and Nineveh are to the east all he had to do is buy time he knew that 40 days away at sea would be long enough to see Nineveh go down but God wasn't gonna let Jonah thwart his plans quite that easily he says he fled to Tarshish from the presence of the Lord now you can't really flee from the presence of the Lord you you know God is everywhere in Psalm 139 David said to where can I go to flee your presence he said if I ascend into heaven you're there if I make my bed in Sheol you're there if I take the wings of the morning and fly to the uttermost islands of the sea even there your hand will guide me you know the darkness is light before you nothing is hidden from you so David made it very clear that you can't really run away from the presence of the Lord but it may be that what this means he tried to flee from the presence of Lord is that he's fleeing from his commission as a prophet one who stands in the presence of the Lord receives messages for people and gives them to the people he might be saying I'm quitting this job I'm fleeing from my in the presence of the Lord role as a prophet it might not mean that he was trying to really get away from God in the literal sense or from the presence of God because God of course is everywhere you can't do that verse four but the Lord sent out a great wind now this is the first kind of intervention of God and supernatural I mean wind isn't supernatural but that God sent it is at least providential God sent out a great wind on the sea and there was a mighty tempest on the sea so that the ship was about to be broken up then the mariners were afraid and every man cried out to his God these were pagans these were not you know Jews so they had many gods they cried out to and they threw their cargo that was in the ship into the sea to lighten the load but Jonah had gone down into the lowest parts of the ship and had lain down and was fast asleep so just just like Jesus could sleep through a storm when the when his disciples the mariners were at their wits end Jesus was able to sleep soundly in the storm storm Jonah who's also a type of Christ seems to be able to do that too now usually that would be the mark of a clean conscience but Jonah's conscience couldn't be clean he was just probably really relieved to feel like he had escaped the commission of God and and was he felt it was safe and he's apparently just a sound sleeper as well so the captain came to him and said to him what do you mean sleeper arise call on your God perhaps your God will consider us so that we may not perish and they said to one another come let us cast lots that we may know for whose cause this trouble has come upon us so they cast lots and the lot fell on Jonah now casting lots of course is like drawing straws or throwing dice or doing something like that's a game of chance to sort of choose one person out of all the participants and focus attention on that person as the winner or in this case the loser the idea here being that they knew God was some God was they didn't know who the real God was they had their gods and they didn't even know who's God Jonah call on your God but we know that there's some divine origin of this tempest because it must have been beyond the the scope of a natural storm and these were seasoned mariners these were professionals they'd been in storms before almost anyone who's been at sea a lot has been through some pretty scary storms but they this one must have been quite exceptional must have been tearing the boat apart and uh and they said this is supernatural we need to find out whose God is angry at somebody here and uh the lot fell on Jonah so it's interesting this we could call that a miracle too because he was the guy and when he cast lots lo and behold he was identified as the God in a game of chance but the Bible says actually in uh Proverbs 16 32 says the lot is cast into the lap but it's every decision is from the Lord that is in the in the Proverbs says they could cast lots to know the mind of God and in cases in fact that's how the disciples replaced Judas in Acts chapter 1 there were two candidates who both seemed to be equally qualified but they cast lots they said Lord show us which one of these you've chosen to cast lots and the lot fell on Matthias so that's how they understood that to be the will of God so casting lots I don't know when it's the thing to do and when it's not the right thing to do but apparently sometimes that's the way God makes his will known and he certainly did in this case because Jonah is the one who gets fingered by it verse 8 then they said to him please tell us for whose cause is this trouble upon us what is your occupation where do you come from what is your country and what uh of what people are you and he said to them I am a Hebrew and I fear Yahweh the God of heaven who made the sea and the dry land then the men were exceedingly afraid and said to him why have you done this for the men knew that he fled from the presence of Yahweh because he had told them then they said to him what shall we do to you that the sea may be calm for us for the sea was growing more tempestuous and he said to them pick me up and throw me into the sea then the sea will become calm for you for I know that this great tempest is because of me nevertheless the men rode hard to bring the ship to land but they could not for the sea continued to grow more tempestuous against them now he said I'm the one at fault if you throw me overboard God will you know calm the sea for you but they were decent people they cared more for his life than he cared for the newbite's life he he didn't care if they got wiped out there's no skin off his nose but for them they could have just thrown him over and say well maybe this will work what do we care but they were actually had some humanitarian you know spark and they said we don't throw you overboard so they kept rowing kept trying to fight the sea see if there's any other way than than killing this guy to to get out of their trouble and therefore they cried out to the lord when they saw that it wasn't working and they said we now by the way it says they cried out to Yahweh when you have the word lord in all capitals in your bible it means that in in the Hebrew text it's it's Yahweh if it's not in all capitals it's in the Hebrew Adonai but Adonai is kind of a generic term for a law Yahweh is the specific name of Israel's God as opposed to the different names for gods that the heathen worship like molek and baal and ashera and so forth so these guys who had cried out to their pagan gods now they're converted now they know that the god of Israel is a supernatural god he sent this storm so they cried out to him they cried out to Yahweh and said we pray oh Yahweh please do not let us perish for this man's life and do not charge us with innocent blood for you oh Yahweh have done as you as pleased you so they picked up Jonah and threw him into the sea and the sea ceased from its raging then the men feared Yahweh exceedingly and offered a sacrifice to Yahweh and made vows here Jonah seems to be really have a knack for converting gentiles you know not only is he the only known evangelist to convert a whole city of pagans he can't even help but convert the shipmates who are pagans and he's not even preaching to them you know it's like when God has his anointing on all of his messengers sometimes they can't help but impacting people in the way that God has has anointed them to to do so so here these guys now they're now worshiping Yahweh and offering sacrifices to him instead of their pagan gods verse 17 now the Lord had prepared a great fish to swallow Jonah and Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights you know although the fish story and i mean the story of the fish and Jonah is its most famous feature the fish is only mentioned in two different verses here where it swallows him and then later when it vomits him out the fish is really not a not a very prominent character in the story he's just the like saying he's just the transport when Jonah wanted to be thrown overboard he probably wanted to drown he just thought well he didn't know there's a fish down there he didn't know that God's gonna put him in a fish all he knows is i'm being thrown into a tempestuous sea without a boat and without a life preserver i think he just wanted to die he wanted to die and uh and like he did at the end of the book he still wanted to die says i'm angry unto death just let me die you know he's he's kind of a pouty kind of a guy you know kind of i don't know he's just not a very winsome character honestly but he probably thought he was escaping his commission by being thrown overboard but he uh to his chagrin he was rescued by a fish now by the way i one of my former pastors said that he doesn't know why people have a hard time thinking God could keep a man alive for three days three nights in the belly of a fish we keep lots of men alive under you know polar ice caps in uh you know a mechanical submarine uh if we can do that if man can do that can't God do that i mean why would that be a problem to God to do something man already does in our time well anyway he's there three days and three nights and that's that's where Jesus takes the expression three days and three nights and in Matthew 12 40 says as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the fish so shall the son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth now by the way in the king James it says in Matthew 12 40 that he was in a whale in the book of Jonah it says a great fish now a whale is not a fish technically a whale is a mammal like you and me but that's kind of a worldly way of categorizing yeah scientists say oh the bible's wrong Jesus said it was a whale and it says in Jonah that it was a great fish it must be a contradiction well wait a minute wait how who authorized us to say that a whale is a mammal and not a fish well that's because we follow the linnaean system of taxonomy which is a man-made system you know we say okay if something has hair and warm blood and it gives live birth to its young and nurses them with milk it's a mammal well that's how we're classifying a mammal what if we were in a society that didn't do that what if we said if something has a big like tail that's made for propelling through water and it's got kind of a you know a torpedo-shaped body and it lives underwater we're going to call that a fish who's to say they couldn't do that we use other classifications but that's a modern classification system we have no right to insist that people in ancient times classified things the way we do for example when god is giving the list in leviticus of clean and unclean foods among the foul which we would say birds that are unclean he lists bats we say bats aren't birds they're mammals yeah by our classification but if an ancient people want to say everything that flies around with wings is a bird who's to say they can't do that it's it's strictly an arbitrary set of criterion for deciding what's a mammal what's a bird we don't even have to have a classification called mammals that's a man-made classification the point is that if jesus said whale and jonah said great fish it would only be because people in those days classified whales as great fish and they've got every right to do so now the truth is though that the word that jesus used in the greek isn't whale it's a great sea creature or a great sea monster the jesus said jonah was three days three nights in the belly of the great sea creature well a big fish is a big sea creature so there's no contradiction even even apparent there so anyway now the three days and three nights this is difficult because if jesus was in fact crucified on friday and rose on sunday there were not three days and three nights between friday afternoon and sunday morning i mean think about it friday is a day friday night is a night saturday is a day saturday night's a night that's two nights and two days sunday is a day but he wasn't in there sunday night so there's no three days and three nights for this reason many people have speculated jesus might have been crucified on thursday or even wednesday there's different theories about it i don't care which one's right because to tell you the truth three days and three nights is a hebrew idiom it's an idiomatic expression there are many of them in the bible because it's written in hebrew or by hebrew people and to the jews a day and a night is the way they spoke of any part of a day we know this because for example they found records uh archaeologists found records of uh what they call a five-day quarantine they say they have to be quarantined for five days and five nights but when you counted up the actual days they mentioned it's really only three days and nights plus a bit of a day before the first one and a bit of a day afterwards a part of a day was counted as a day and a night that's just the way the jews talked so if jesus was in the tomb friday part that is part of friday saturday and a part of sunday the jews would have no problem speaking of that as three days and three nights and jesus did actually choose that term in order to match it to this statement three days three nights and jonah he spoke with jonah but most of the time jesus said he would rise on the third day now if he was in the tomb three days and three nights and then rose that'd be the fourth day so if he was crucified on friday and raised sunday that's the third day and that's the traditional date a good friday is when he died he rose sunday that's sunday is the third day after friday now only once in all the bible does jesus say he'd be three days and three nights and that's when he's mimicking the language of jonah because he's talking about the comparison to jonah and he's using an expression that jews would recognize to mean at least parts of three days that's all that would mean to them but five three or four times jesus said he would rise on the third day and even after the event paul in first corinthians 15 when he started the resurrection and this is decades after the resurrection of christ he certainly knew how long it was that jesus was in the tomb he said that this is the gospel jesus was he died for our sins according to the scripture he was buried and he rose again the third day according to the scripture so it doesn't seem possible that jesus could rise the third day and still be three days and three nights in there so his three days and three nights i think is best understood as the use of the common manner of jewish speaking about such things and it may also be that jonah is using it that way too we don't know which actual days and nights jonah was in the whale now or the fish chapter then jonah prayed to the lord his god from the fish's belly now when i was living in northern california near a college we saw in the newspapers that the college was uh one of the the humanist club in the college which would be atheists they were sponsoring a speaker to come in and talk about the the humor the humanist view of the bible so i thought i'd like to go hear that and i did and the man just kind of made fun of the bible he's just a skeptic uh you know he didn't believe anything in the bible and one thing he said was i like to serve jonah in the whale you know this this man gets swallowed by a whale and what does he do while he's in there he says well what would you do he did what anyone do he wrote poetry and he yuck yuck yuck he's joking he's trying to make it look ridiculous he wrote poetry well it's true that chapter two which has jonah's prayer is poetry but we're not told he wrote it when he was in the belly of the whale i mean of course the man is trying to make it look silly it's not silly what jonah did is pray and that seems a very reasonable thing for a man to do when he's swallowed by a whale i suppose there's not many men who do anything else than that so i mean to to make it seem oh this is so ridiculous he wrote this poetry but it doesn't say he wrote anything we don't even know if he wrote the book of jonah someone else could have written about him but whether he wrote it or not he didn't write it i don't think he had parchment and and pen and ink in the belly of the whale oh before you throw me over make sure i have enough writing material so i can write down this prayer while i'm in the whale's belly now that now he remembers prayer easily enough and wrote it later no doubt and here's his prayer and this whole chapter is his prayer he prayed to the lord his god from the fish's belly kind of repented of his bad attitude too he said i cried out to the lord because of my affliction and he has answered me out of the belly of shale i cried and you have heard my voice for you cast me into the deep into the heart of the seas and the flood surrounded me all your billows and your waves passed over me then i said i have been cast out of your sight i will look again toward your holy temple now by the way these almost every line in this prayer can there are lines similar to it or are identical in some cases in the psalms here and there in the psalms are very typical prayers such as david wrote at an earlier generation in fact jonah living after david's time might have known the psalms and might have tended to pray in the same kind of language that david had used but it's interesting that he says in verse four yet i will look again toward your holy temple what he's in the total darkness in the bottom of ocean in a whale he obviously has hope he obviously expects to be delivered he i don't know if i would i mean expect to be if i swallowed by a big animal and i don't know if i'd have any hope of being delivered unless god promised it if god had promised her that certainly we could believe it but we don't see they'd even have that promise he just had this hope that god was not done with him someday i'll be i'll be looking at the temple again the waters encompassed me even to my soul the deep closed around me weeds were wrapped around my head i went down to the moorings of the mountains the earth with its bars closed behind me forever that is forever of course i end up being three days but the point here is this is poetic language um the weeds wrapping around his head i i think of jonah as a type of christ jesus had weeds wrapped around his head too crown of thorns and it says yet you have brought up my life from the pit oh lord my god now he's saying this by faith because it hadn't happened yet but he obviously expected to be um to be uh delivered by god those who regard worthless idols forsake their own mercy but i will sacrifice to you with the voice of thanksgiving i will pay what i vowed salvation is of the lord so the lord spoke to the fish and it vomited jonah onto dry land now the man could not have expected salvation from any other source in the condition he was in but he said salvation is from the lord the lord is the savior by the way the name jesus means yahweh is salvation and in this he's saying salvation is of yahweh so he's basically his declaration is very much like calling out on the name of jesus not that he was not that he knew about jesus but he's his declaration that salvation is of yahweh that's that's exactly what the name jesus means so the lord spoke to the fish it vomited jonah on dry land now the word chapter three of the lord came to jonah the second time saying arise go to nineveh that great city and preached to it the message that i tell you so jonah arose and went to nineveh according to the word of the lord now nineveh was an exceedingly great city a three-day journey in extent now three-day journey almost all commentators would say means it takes three days to walk the perimeter now the city itself is walls have been found by archaeologists and it would not take three days to walk around the perimeter of those walls but there were also suburbs around nineveh and it says it was a great city we could say he's talking about greater nineveh just like you know there's greater los angeles greater new york city and so forth it's not just the city itself it's it's the various birds and and suburbs and so forth uh that would be all considered to be the sprawl the city sprawl and to walk around the whole populous area would apparently take around about three days to to journey around it um so verse four and jonah began to enter the city on the first day's walk the first day's walk then he cried out and said yet 40 days and nineveh shall be overthrown this one line is the only prophecy in the bible in this book of the bible like i said almost all prophets write books of prophecy this one's a book of history a historical narrative with only one prophecy and it's a process end up not coming true because the people repented and it was a conditional problem prophecy though notice that he doesn't mention any conditions he doesn't say unless you repent you're going to be destroyed in 40 days he just said it's going to happen but but like we saw in jeremiah says if i ever say it's going to happen to any people if they repent i won't do it so even if he doesn't mention the conditions they are always there's always a subtext if god says i'm going to bless you there's a subject unless of course you rebel against me and do evil then then no and likewise if he says i'm going to destroy you there's the subtext unless you repent obviously then that i won't and that that is seen in when jeremiah spoke there in jeremiah 18 and also here in this story because it says the people of nineveh believed god proclaimed a fast and put on sackcloth from the greatest to the least and this is a means of in ancient times showing that they were sorry and repented the word came to the king of nineveh and he arose from his throne and laid aside his robe and covered himself with sackcloth and sat in ashes and he caused it to be proclaimed and published throughout nineveh by the decree of the king and his nobles saying let neither man nor beast herd nor flock taste anything nor let them eat or drink water in other words they're fasting fasting with repentance was a commonplace to even the animals have to fast uh everyone's got a fast now the interesting thing here is this was a a bottom-up revival this was not some king like josiah and judah proclaiming that everyone had to repent and the people just kind of okay if you say so but this is a the people first repent the people heard the people were convicted the people called the fast and the king was kind of swept up in it he he agreed to it too but this was something that happened from from the grassroots level god through his spirit just moving people to repent and then it just kind of just was swelled up into something that came all the way up to the throne and the king himself is also proclaiming a fast for man and beast but let man and beast be covered with sackcloth and cry mightily to god yes let everyone turn from his evil way and from the violence that is in his hands who can tell if god will turn and repent and turn away from his fierce anger so that we may not perish now he didn't he didn't even know the promise in jeremiah the king is a pagan he doesn't know maybe god will have mercy we don't know but let's just repent let's fast let's seek the face and mercy of god maybe who knows maybe he'll give us a break maybe he'll forgive maybe he won't kill us then god saw their work and they turned from their evil way and god repented from the disaster that he had said he would bring upon them and he did not do it which of course echoes the words of jeremiah 18 where he says if i see them repent i will repent of the evil i said i would do now the final chapter is very short but it displeased jonah exceedingly and he became angry so he prayed to the lord and said ah lord was not this what i said when i was still in my own country therefore i fled previously to tarshish for i know that you are a gracious and merciful god slow to anger and abundant in loving kindness one who relents or repents from doing harm therefore now oh lord please take my life from me for it is better for me to die than to live what a hissy fit he's a real drama queen oh just kill me if you're not going to wipe them out just kill me it's better for me to die now he said i knew before i left home you were going to do this now he didn't actually know for sure that they would repent but he knew that if they did i know you're a god who's merciful i knew that if they would repent you'd do something like this and spare them you'd forgive them and i didn't want that that's why i didn't want to come here that's why i took ship to tarshish she says because i knew this could happen so now it's happened i didn't get my way just kill me now see if god doesn't do things your way the mature thing to do is not say i just want to die i didn't get my way it's better to say you know i guess god had a better idea my plans are not what god is obligated to follow i might prefer that things go well for me and my family my kids i might prefer that you know none of my children get sick or die i might prefer that my parents live long healthy lives and die in their sleep you know without i prefer all kinds of things but if it happens otherwise and god says no this is the way it's going to be well then i don't say oh then just kill me god you know it's ridiculous what a uh so anyway he says just kill me and then the lord said is it right for you to be angry now god says this to him twice as we'll see jonah went out of the city and sat at the east side of the city there he made himself a shelter and sat under it in the shade apparently it wasn't adequate till he might see what would become of the city and the lord prepared a plant the king james has a gourd but the hebrew word is not known what kind of plant it was just some unidentified plant and made it come up over jonah so it might be shade for his head to deliver him from the misery so jonah was very grateful for the plant he liked it when things were good for him but as morning dawned the next day god prepared a worm and it so damaged the plant that it withered and didn't provide shade for him anymore the next day and it happened when the sun arose that god prepared a vehement east wind and the sun beat on jonah's head so that he grew faint and he wished death for himself and said it's better for me to die than to live then god said to jonah is it right for you to be angry about the plant now twice he says is it right for you to be angry and you know that question alone should be enough for any reasonable person to if they're getting mad at something if you meet somebody who's mad a christian especially they're angry at somebody you say well are you doing the right thing by being angry do you really have that good a reason to be angry in most cases they would hopefully say well you know probably not i guess i guess not so not so much but jonah he holds sticks to his guns he says yes yes i am right to be angry even to death i'm so angry i want to die but the lord said you have had pity on the plant for which you have not labored nor made it grow which came up in a night and perished in a night and should i not pity nineveh that great city in which are more than 120 000 persons who cannot discern between their right hand and their left and also much livestock since the livestock i guess fasted too he threw them in there yeah i guess spare them too but uh he says nineveh had like 120 000 people who he says did not know their right hand from their left now what's that mean some people think it means there were that many little children who had not reached the age of knowing their right from their left because babies aren't born knowing that but children learn it fairly early on so it's saying that those who they they knew so little they didn't know their right hand from the left means there are 120 000 children and then the whole population of the city would be much larger most experts would say the city wasn't large enough for that to be the meaning but it could be that all the inhabitants of the city adults including were referred to as not knowing their right hand from their left not literally again that's a hebrew idiom in deuteronomy god said to israel you know make sure you don't turn to you know you keep my laws and don't turn to the right hand or the left these will be different ways of deviating from what's right and there there is a pagan babylonian expression known from the period from other findings of the time that the babylonians use the expression of the left hand and the right hand to mean justice and what is right or law and order these are these are different meanings that the people of that period used and meant when they said the right hand and the left so basically god's probably saying these people don't know which way is up these people don't know morality at all they've never had the law like you jews have had i gave you the law you wouldn't know it either but these people haven't even had that advantage they don't know which way is right which way is wrong they've got no revelation from god and you don't pity them sure they're bad people but they don't know how bad they are i mean who knows how they'd be if they'd gotten the advantages you jews have had and this is something that is a rebuke to really any of us who have been acquainted with the bible or with christian teaching most of our lives that we look at people who are like maybe muslim extremists or some other kind of people that are within or frankly people looting in the streets and burning down other people's businesses how could anyone be so evil how could anyone be so crazy well i guess that's how people are who don't have any knowledge of god you know we've we've lived in a country that's had so much widespread knowledge of god that people have been pretty much restrained knowing right from wrong because the church and the bible have been so influential but you see the last generation so the bible isn't hasn't been influential the church has not been influential in the culture and now we got a bunch of young fools frankly who don't know they don't know what's right and wrong they've been told by their teachers and their college professors certain things and because they don't know god they don't know how to judge all things and hold fast what is good like paul tells us to do we can judge everything by description if someone tells us something's foolish that's foolish that's ridiculous we know we have a standard to measure by but people who don't have the bible don't have that standard that doesn't mean it's okay for them to do wrong nineveh wasn't getting a free pass if they hadn't repented they're going to be wiped out so will they so will the people who don't know god and who do wicked things but we should have some sense of compassion of those who've never even been told what the right thing is people have never heard the gospel for example and the lesson of this book at the very end seems to be this you know you're so interested in your own comfort you lost your house you lost your you know your job you lost the gourd that was providing shade overhead you lost what was convenient to you and you're and you're about ready to have a hissy fit and say uh it's better for me to die god where were you how dare you do this to me and yet there's millions of people out there who don't even have the advantage you have of knowing who god is they don't know the gospel they don't know the bible and shouldn't you like have at least as much interest in them as in yourself like how about more i mean we are so mindful of the discomforts and the losses that we suffer and that becomes a big trial to us in many cases like you know why would god do this to me and we're so narcissistic we're so self-focused that we don't remember you know we have had so many advantages god owes us none of them and those people out there don't i mean they're lost they're facing judgment they're facing condemnation and uh and we're worried about whether you know we're out in the sun without a shade you know that's what jonah was doing you know the the gourd is gone i'm angry now i'm hot again god says yeah you you care about that gourd you didn't even earn it you didn't do anything to make it happen uh it just came in a night and left tonight it's a temporal passing thing but these people these people aren't like a plant it's not something that comes and goes in a day and it's all had no significance in the long term these are human beings and they don't know any better shouldn't i have had compassion on them god said and we see in jonah how much more compassion god has for sinners than even god's people have for them that doesn't mean god can let them off the hook sinners still have to be judged if they're not if they don't repent but god wants all the repent god's not willing that any should perish if at all she comes to repentance and of course jonah was supposed to be the evangelist and he was and he actually he didn't bring any good news he only brought bad news you're going to perish but apparently god used that and and he converted a whole city and a whole ship but because it didn't go his way he didn't rejoice in it we're in the new testament it's sort of like the pharisees all these tax collectors and sinners were coming to christ to be saved that's a good thing the pharisees should be glad oh well you know we're for god it's great to see these people come back to god and jesus said well you know this is like a prodigal who's come home this is like a sheep that was lost has been found this is like a coin that was lost by someone who had very few coins and she found again she calls all her friends come rejoice with me the prodigal son's father said come and let's have a party because my son was lost now he's found that's god's heart for the loss and we see it in jonah we don't see it in jonah the man it's conspicuous by its absence from him but we see it in the book god says listen i have compassion on these people i see these people a little more sympathetically than you do because i know how little they know and uh probably you'd be no better if you knew as little as they do you might even be worse so that's the lesson of jonah there's more lessons in it by the way but we've i've used up the time allotted so i'm going to go ahead and end it with that

Series by Steve Gregg

Ephesians
Ephesians
In this 10-part series, Steve Gregg provides verse by verse teachings and insights through the book of Ephesians, emphasizing themes such as submissio
Ruth
Ruth
Steve Gregg provides insightful analysis on the biblical book of Ruth, exploring its historical context, themes of loyalty and redemption, and the cul
Nahum
Nahum
In the series "Nahum" by Steve Gregg, the speaker explores the divine judgment of God upon the wickedness of the city Nineveh during the Assyrian rule
Beyond End Times
Beyond End Times
In "Beyond End Times", Steve Gregg discusses the return of Christ, judgement and rewards, and the eternal state of the saved and the lost.
Genuinely Following Jesus
Genuinely Following Jesus
Steve Gregg's lecture series on discipleship emphasizes the importance of following Jesus and becoming more like Him in character and values. He highl
Isaiah
Isaiah
A thorough analysis of the book of Isaiah by Steve Gregg, covering various themes like prophecy, eschatology, and the servant songs, providing insight
Joel
Joel
Steve Gregg provides a thought-provoking analysis of the book of Joel, exploring themes of judgment, restoration, and the role of the Holy Spirit.
Habakkuk
Habakkuk
In his series "Habakkuk," Steve Gregg delves into the biblical book of Habakkuk, addressing the prophet's questions about God's actions during a troub
Nehemiah
Nehemiah
A comprehensive analysis by Steve Gregg on the book of Nehemiah, exploring the story of an ordinary man's determination and resilience in rebuilding t
1 Peter
1 Peter
Steve Gregg teaches verse by verse through the book of 1 Peter, delving into themes of salvation, regeneration, Christian motivation, and the role of
More Series by Steve Gregg

More on OpenTheo

Is It Okay to Ask God for the Repentance of Someone Who Has Passed Away?
Is It Okay to Ask God for the Repentance of Someone Who Has Passed Away?
#STRask
April 24, 2025
Questions about asking God for the repentance of someone who has passed away, how to respond to a request to pray for a deceased person, reconciling H
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Four: Licona Responds and Q&A
Licona vs. Fales: A Debate in 4 Parts – Part Four: Licona Responds and Q&A
Risen Jesus
June 18, 2025
Today is the final episode in our four-part series covering the 2014 debate between Dr. Michael Licona and Dr. Evan Fales. In this hour-long episode,
Is There a Reference Guide to Teach Me the Vocabulary of Apologetics?
Is There a Reference Guide to Teach Me the Vocabulary of Apologetics?
#STRask
May 1, 2025
Questions about a resource for learning the vocabulary of apologetics, whether to pursue a PhD or another master’s degree, whether to earn a degree in
A Reformed Approach to Spiritual Formation with Matthew Bingham
A Reformed Approach to Spiritual Formation with Matthew Bingham
Life and Books and Everything
March 31, 2025
It is often believed, by friends and critics alike, that the Reformed tradition, though perhaps good on formal doctrine, is impoverished when it comes
Can Secular Books Assist Our Christian Walk?
Can Secular Books Assist Our Christian Walk?
#STRask
April 17, 2025
Questions about how secular books assist our Christian walk and how Greg studies the Bible.   * How do secular books like Atomic Habits assist our Ch
Licona and Martin Talk about the Physical Resurrection of Jesus
Licona and Martin Talk about the Physical Resurrection of Jesus
Risen Jesus
May 21, 2025
In today’s episode, we have a Religion Soup dialogue from Acadia Divinity College between Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Dale Martin on whether Jesus physica
How Should I Respond to the Phrase “Just Follow the Science”?
How Should I Respond to the Phrase “Just Follow the Science”?
#STRask
March 31, 2025
Questions about how to respond when someone says, “Just follow the science,” and whether or not it’s a good tactic to cite evolutionists’ lack of a go
If Sin Is a Disease We’re Born with, How Can We Be Guilty When We Sin?
If Sin Is a Disease We’re Born with, How Can We Be Guilty When We Sin?
#STRask
June 19, 2025
Questions about how we can be guilty when we sin if sin is a disease we’re born with, how it can be that we’ll have free will in Heaven but not have t
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Can Historians Prove that Jesus Rose from the Dead? Licona vs. Ehrman
Risen Jesus
May 7, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Bart Ehrman face off for the second time on whether historians can prove the resurrection. Dr. Ehrman says no
Do People with Dementia Have Free Will?
Do People with Dementia Have Free Will?
#STRask
June 16, 2025
Question about whether or not people with dementia have free will and are morally responsible for the sins they commit.   * Do people with dementia h
What Questions Should I Ask Someone Who Believes in a Higher Power?
What Questions Should I Ask Someone Who Believes in a Higher Power?
#STRask
May 26, 2025
Questions about what to ask someone who believes merely in a “higher power,” how to make a case for the existence of the afterlife, and whether or not
Why Do Some Churches Say You Need to Keep the Mosaic Law?
Why Do Some Churches Say You Need to Keep the Mosaic Law?
#STRask
May 5, 2025
Questions about why some churches say you need to keep the Mosaic Law and the gospel of Christ to be saved, and whether or not it’s inappropriate for
The Resurrection - Argument from Personal Incredulity or Methodological Naturalism - Licona vs. Dillahunty - Part 2
The Resurrection - Argument from Personal Incredulity or Methodological Naturalism - Licona vs. Dillahunty - Part 2
Risen Jesus
March 26, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Licona provides a positive case for the resurrection of Jesus at the 2017 [UN]Apologetic Conference in Austin, Texas. He bases hi
Douglas Groothuis: Morality as Evidence for God
Douglas Groothuis: Morality as Evidence for God
Knight & Rose Show
March 22, 2025
Wintery Knight and Desert Rose welcome Douglas Groothuis to discuss morality. Is morality objective or subjective? Can atheists rationally ground huma
Licona vs. Shapiro: Is Belief in the Resurrection Justified?
Licona vs. Shapiro: Is Belief in the Resurrection Justified?
Risen Jesus
April 30, 2025
In this episode, Dr. Mike Licona and Dr. Lawrence Shapiro debate the justifiability of believing Jesus was raised from the dead. Dr. Shapiro appeals t